Re: FUD in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14568439 en Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:47:54 EDT Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:47:54 EDT Re: FUD http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568511 amungus : yep, and what's to stop them from keeping at least a step or 5 ahead of some "list" of ip's that "could" be tracking...

somebody was bound to think of trying this "network" for even shadier purposes than its original intent. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568511 Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:10:53 EDT Re: FUD http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568439 Minister : Likely because they're the first ones brought up as a legit solution every time someone mentions p2p anonymity?

Let people try them. False sense of security is about all they're good for. As if BayTSP and other pirate hunters can't grab a stack of IP addresses these groups miss....]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568439 Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:57:35 EDT FUD http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568417 MxxCon :
We would direct Desperate Housewives traders worried about lawsuits to other dedicated p2p privacy apps like Peer Guardian or SafePeer, but as our users have consistently pointed out, they don't really work.
if those tin-foil-hat solutions dont' work, why do you even bother mentioning them?:huh:
--
[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB]]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14568417 Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:52:35 EDT