<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: but in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14444956</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:37:57 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:37:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14445453</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The RIAA should know that..... Resistance is futile]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14445453</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:17:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14444956</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/185013"><b>jwardl</b></A> : Who cares? Then something better will come along. If the RIAA and MPAA had a corner on the market of innovation, they'd be too busy raking in the cash to have time for such silly games.<br>Instead, they blame file sharers for their reduced incomes, as if cutting off all file sharing would increase their bottom line (it wouldn't). ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14444956</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:48:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14444440</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/295959"><b>Augustus III</b></A> : Doesn't that ultimately cost them a lot of money? If people were doing their part, they should have been running a deficit by now instead of 400% profits vs in the year 2000 when they were making less.. <br><br>this simply proves that force does work into scaring the sheeple. go riaa.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14444440</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:10:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
