Re: Greedy bastards, they don't even provide the ads in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14428009 en Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:54:42 EDT Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:54:42 EDT Re: Greedy bastards, they don't even provide the a http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14431415 BlitzenZeus : So if we would leave the tv on all day our bill would get smaller, even if someone was not watching it? I don't think so.... This call came about in the digital cable/sat age, and these damn boxes track just about everything you do. So in the end they don't get the audience for their commercials, boo hoo, we really didn't want to see them anyway, they were already paid for the channels, get over it, and stop counting your piles of money while wishing you could have more.

I don't watch much tv, as a matter of fact I only have the free local broadcast channels at this time, but the few shows I like to watch are better if I don't have wade through the commercials, even my vcr records shows with automatic commercial skip which works 95% of the time so I don't even have to fast forward/resume.

If I really like a show, I actually buy the seasons to watch when I want to, they are like mini movies, and you get many of them for the price of 3 normal dvd movies or less usually.
--
My hourly rates:
$25 per hour.
$35 per hour if you want to watch.
$45 per hour if you want to help.
$75 per hour if you tried to fix it, and failed.
The biggest error is sitting in front of your keyboard.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14431415 Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:01:39 EDT Re: Greedy bastards, they don't even provide the a http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14430350 Trivista : A lot of the content providers require the purchase of groups of channels. Their are not really that many providers offering cable content.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14430350 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:43:07 EDT Re: Greedy bastards, they don't even provide the a http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14429318 nixen :
said by stickfigure See Profile :

Is it fair that we charge all viewers for all channels when its really only a couple channels viewers want to watch? Put that in your pipe and smoke it,jackass content providers!!! :mad:
Except that the number of channels offered is s function of your cable/satellite service, not of the individual content providers.

Let's face it: the fairest model is usage based. That is, offer X number channels to chose from, but charge based on the number of minutes of programming viewed/recorded.

-tom
--
"Some people have morals, standards and ideals about quality, but I'm an American: I couldn't care less." --Tony Pierce (paraphrased)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14429318 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:50:27 EDT Re: Greedy bastards, they don't even provide the ads http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14429251 stickfigure : "Is it fair that we charge all viewers when it's really only those who skip the ads that are requiring fees to go up?"

Is it fair that we charge all viewers for all channels when its really only a couple channels viewers want to watch? Put that in your pipe and smoke it,jackass content providers!!! :mad:]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14429251 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:37:35 EDT Re: Greedy bastards, they don't even provide the ads http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14428009 nixen : Said by Program Content Provider: "The fees we charge the cable companies are based on a certain ad revenue cost recovery rate. If the end viewers are skipping commercials, advertisers will be less willing to pay high advertising fees. This means we will need to pass the uncovered costs of providing content along to the end viewers. Is it fair that we charge all viewers when it's really only those who skip the ads that are requiring fees to go up?"

-tom
--
"Some people have morals, standards and ideals about quality, but I'm an American: I couldn't care less." --Tony Pierce (paraphrased)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14428009 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:36:38 EDT Greedy bastards, they don't even provide the ads http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14427619 BlitzenZeus : So we would pay more if we skip ads on channels were PAYING FOR... Yet another way to screw the consumer, the channel is already paid so who in the F*** are they to charge us if we don't watch the ads?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14427619 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:39:11 EDT