<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Another Alternative in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14340254</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:51:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:51:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14345530</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by Garcya :</SMALL><br><br>You also fail to mention the upload/download caps for satellite users. Just because the fcc might say sattelite is broadband does not make it so. <br> </DIV>Speeds are OK and getting better:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/shownews/67338">New DirecWay Speeds</A><br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/a9o7w"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14345530</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:53:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14342982</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  RadioDoc <A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>BPL will never see significant deployment in so-called 'rural' areas, for the same reason that you don't see cable or DSL there:  No return on investment.  And BPL has more serious technical limitations than cable and even DSL.<br><br>The people dissing BPL aren't doing it because they already have broadband.  They're doing it because it is a failed technology.  The only people promoting think they can make a quick e-buck.<br><br>Sorry.<br> </DIV>In rural areas, I agree with you. Unless Wimax or something else comes along that is economical, satellite is still the only non-dialup option.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/a9o7w"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14342982</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:08:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14342840</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/897844"><b>N3OGH</b></A> : Oh, drop the class warfare crap, it was old in the 80's.<br><br>Hey, I'd love to have a fiber optic pipe the diameter of an elephant's trunk running into my basement.  Alas, I can't afford it.  I remember the days when "dial up" was 300 bps into a Wildcat! Apple II BBS.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14342840</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:46:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14342489</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/876879"><b>dibbb</b></A> : Agreed.<br><br>Dial-up is better than DirecWay.  More reliable and faster at times.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14342489</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:56:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14341681</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : BPL will never see significant deployment in so-called 'rural' areas, for the same reason that you don't see cable or DSL there:  No return on investment.  And BPL has more serious technical limitations than cable and even DSL.<br><br>The people dissing BPL aren't doing it because they already have broadband.  They're doing it because it is a failed technology.  The only people promoting think they can make a quick e-buck.<br><br>Sorry.<br><SMALL>--<br>Let me see you make decisions, without your television.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14341681</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:45:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14341481</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/797963"><b>rollobancher</b></A> : Yea, I know that satellite is available but personally ( and others may agree with me) i don't feel like paying $500 for the satellite alone and then $60 a month for some sleazy 512/128 kbps connection. That extra $500 spent on that satellite could go to something more use-full, like the months rent, or car payment.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14341481</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:10:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14341287</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/585075"><b>Samwoo</b></A> : bpl doesn't promise more coverage at cheaper prices... where  did that idea come from?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14341287</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:33:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14341042</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><b>sbrook</b></A> : Nothing like a good irrelevent post.  BPL is technologically flawed by its inherent design.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14341042</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:45:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340606</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1252553"><b>wannagofast8</b></A> : thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340606</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 14:26:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340539</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Wow something California is behind that I can agree to; never thought I'd see the day ::D  Those of you who keep booing BPL.. nut'n but a bunch of girlie men.:)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340539</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 14:15:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340532</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : You also fail to mention the upload/download caps for satellite users. Just because the fcc might say sattelite is broadband does not make it so. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340532</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 14:13:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340444</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  the niTz <A HREF="/useremail/u/1035911"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>isnt sat like a few hundred for setup and a hundred or so amonth for service?<br> </DIV>$100 for install; $100/mo 1st year; $60/mo after 1st yr.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.high-speed-internet-access-guide.com/nationwide-satellite.html" >www.high-speed-internet-access-g&middot;&middot;&middot;ite.html</A><br><br>Or &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.rapidsatellite.com/SearchResult.aspx?CategoryID=43" >www.rapidsatellite.com/SearchRes&middot;&middot;&middot;oryID=43</A><br><div class="bquote">DIRECWAY Special Offer - ONLY $59.99 Down and $99/month for 15 months, then $59/mo. after that. Includes Standard Professional Installation</DIV>Both deals are cheaper for internet access if you also get DirecTV too.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/a9o7w"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340444</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:58:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340419</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/933831"><b>Lefty</b></A> : Satelite is expensive and BPL is a great idea. Just because he is stuck on dial-up doesn't give you the right to assume he is finacially unstable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340419</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:55:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340408</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/664049"><b>raIDERspeed</b></A> : Good I know a lot of people that live out hill's and their wireless ISP's suck..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340408</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:53:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340390</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1035911"><b>the niTz</b></A> : isnt sat like a few hundred for setup and a hundred or so amonth for service?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340390</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:51:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340346</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by somevipperson :</SMALL><br><br>Even if it was expensive to him. Does it matter to you? So poorer people shouldn't be allowed to have a HSI option even if it is inferior in speeds?<br><br>That makes sense. In your opinion we should keep dialcrap alive, huh?<br> </DIV>If you can read, I never said block BPL rollout. But it isn't going to move quickly, so satellite is an OPTION if he wants higher speeds now. <br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/a9o7w"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340346</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:42:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340329</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Even if it was expensive to him. Does it matter to you? So poorer people shouldn't be allowed to have a HSI option even if it is inferior in speeds?<br><br>That makes sense. In your opinion we should keep dialcrap alive, huh?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340329</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:39:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340270</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  rollobancher <A HREF="/useremail/u/797963"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br> I really dont give if it doesnt take over cable or dsl. All i care about is if BPL can give me over a 52-kbps connection that my dial-up ISp is providing me. I really dont get you guys that already have broadband and are dissing on BPL. Dont you remember the days when you were stuck on dial-up also ???? IT SUCKS! <br> </DIV>Ever hear of satellite?? It is available now. It isn't perfect, but it is better than dial-up. Too expensive for you??<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/a9o7w"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340270</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:29:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Another Alternative</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340254</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/797963"><b>rollobancher</b></A> :  I really dont give if it doesnt take over cable or dsl. All i care about is if BPL can give me over a 52-kbps connection that my dial-up ISp is providing me. I really dont get you guys that already have broadband and are dissing on BPL. Dont you remember the days when you were stuck on dial-up also ???? IT SUCKS! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14340254</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:28:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
