<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: BitTorrent is not a network in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14118115</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:26:13 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:26:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: BitTorrent is not a network</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14118115</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/237192"><b>xdeadhead</b></A> : my bad forget it. i misread your post.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14118115</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:35:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>BitTorrent is not a network</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14116166</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/744594"><b>wmcbrine</b></A> : Om Malik errs in reffering to BitTorrent as "a network". Each shared file, or torrent, is a separate virtual network of its own. Nothing links them to one another. Rather, BitTorrent is a protocol, a servlet (combined client/server), and a system.<br><br>One could argue that the new search capability on bittorrent.com changes this, but it's not an essential part of the system.<br><br>As I understand it, it's also wrong to imply that BitTorrent started as a tool for illegal trading; I've read that it was originally conceived to share Linux ISOs. In any case, legitimate use has flourished alongside shadier trading from the beginning; it's not a new development.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14116166</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:15:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
