<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Picture quality in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13780381</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:27:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:27:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Picture quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13811407</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1228390"><b>tidgins</b></A> : Actually, You guys are cutting the Slingbox short. The video quality is actually pretty good.<br><br>Obviously if you were to have a higher upload speed, then your video would stream better. However 256 kpbs is the Sling recommended upload speed. It actually looks pretty good at that type of speed.<br><br>Anyway, just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on that with having seen it already.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13811407</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:06:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Picture quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13782207</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1218511"><b>Primis1</b></A> : Heh.  You're asking one of the biggest sports fanatics in the world if it'd be worth it to him if he could be in some-remote-place-with-no-TV-but-wifi-istan taking care of something important, and still be able to watch The Game on his laptop?  Even at low quality?<br><br>You bethca'!!  Sign me up!!!<br><br>You have no idea the number of people that will, when stuck at work during a game, sit and watch/monitor one of those GameTracker java applets that give realtime data for a game.  it's a huge number.  And that's with no audio or video!!<br><br>With a video stream though?!  Even a low-quality one?  Totally.  I'm there...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13782207</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:02:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Picture quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13781373</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/277417"><b>Wills</b></A> : UMM HMM]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13781373</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:21:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Picture quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13780535</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/763973"><b>kelch1999</b></A> : This is true, but what if there are other upstreams? Voip, web server, ftp, etc. Would it be worth watching your "own" TV?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13780535</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:10:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Picture quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13780381</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1218511"><b>Primis1</b></A> : It wouldn't *need* to be that good for the purposes of most.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13780381</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:47:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Picture quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13780371</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Does Billy Bob Thorton have one?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13780371</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:45:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Picture quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13780362</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/244791"><b>Gilitar</b></A> : Picture quality couldn't be that good with most ISPs only giving 256k up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13780362</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:43:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
