<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: No way... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13647477</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:13:01 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:13:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: No way...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13649229</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/558713"><b>bradt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by sht torrent:</SMALL><BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>This just HAS to be a joke. With all the different connections and distribution nodes for natural gas even if this could work you would end up with dial-up bandwitdh.<br><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>No, but this is.<br><br>Hey, why not broadband-over-sewer-lines? Then we could use ShitTorrent to "swap files" with our neighbors. I'd love to see the RIAA have to wade through that stuff...<br> </DIV>That's one file-sharing system I'll be avoiding, thank you.<br><br>Brad]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13649229</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:09:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No way...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13647477</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>This just HAS to be a joke. With all the different connections and distribution nodes for natural gas even if this could work you would end up with dial-up bandwitdh.<br><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>No, but this is.<br><br>Hey, why not broadband-over-sewer-lines? Then we could use ShitTorrent to "swap files" with our neighbors. I'd love to see the RIAA have to wade through that stuff...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13647477</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:44:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>No way...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13647037</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/558713"><b>bradt</b></A> : I just checked the calender and it isn't April 1.<br><br>This just HAS to be a joke.  With all the different connections and distribution nodes for natural gas even if this  could work you would end up with dial-up bandwitdh.<br><br>Plus the danger of inserting whatever endpoint you would need at the customer premise would be astronomical.  We just had a building blow up because of faulty gas connections up here in Minnesota, they then discovered that the whole block is connected with faulty connections and needs to be replaced.  I just don't see any municipality giving a licence to any hair-brained scheme like this.<br><br>I wonder if they also could sell me the Brooklyn bridge....<br><br>Brad]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13647037</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:42:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
