<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: No in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13620148</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:43:16 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:43:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: No</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13620148</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : This reminds me of that washington mutual commercial where they stamp the bar code to the guys forehead and send him off to another long line! First they implant every chip with a remotely readable serial number, next they want to make sure you pay for all that software you load onto the chips, wow.. and i'm sure that will lower the total cost of ownership of that chip too!, NOT! if anything, it will be MORE expensive since someone has to pay for all that fancy security they're putting into the chip, those people don't work for free.. and intel is notorious for making a profit, notice that they were salivating for a couple years now with those $500 ipods, wondering how they could get a chance to get in on that honey pot!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13620148</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:24:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>No</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13617244</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1031267"><b>Titus Pullo</b></A> : If they're dancing around the truth now, they'll be dancing around the truth from here on out.  Put 'em in the bozo-bin with their corporate brethren.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13617244</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:43:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
