<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Verizon does have a point in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13598988</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:29:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:29:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Verizon does have a point</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13598988</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843547"><b>joebear29</b></A> : Verizon does have a point regarding video.  Why should they have to service an entire town, when that town (very likely) already has access to cable and satelite.  Does it really matter if half the town has Verizon video and half does not, so long as there is another option?<br><br>Note - this post in no way refers to FTTH.  That is a seperate subject.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13598988</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:24:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
