<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month in VOIP Tech Chat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13452089</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:41:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:41:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14202255</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085609"><b>Richard09</b></A> : I talked to someone with customer service earlier on today, and they told they were working on the failover system and should hopefully have it up and running sometime this fall.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14202255</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:04:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14201326</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : That is my sticking point.  I have one line for home/fax use, the other for bsuiness, so without something along the simulring or failover I would be up the creek as you could imagine...<br>I could see a client needing to schedule an interview with a consultant and not being able to reach me, or wanting to make an offer and me not getting it for 30 mins..that can mean loss of business...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14201326</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:03:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200813</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : Nope, it takes 30 minutes before Voicemail kicks in in case of a localized outage.  They are working on it, though, so hopefully this next firmware they are testing right now has an improved failover built into it.  I myself would like to see simulring implemented, because I could use the functionality when I am in my car and I am awaiting an important call aside from any failover functionality.    But in absence of that a simple "in case" rollover to cell or VM would be ok.  I believe Voicepulse advertises that their failover kicks in after about 30 seconds to 1 minute, and claims that to be the fastest in the industry.   So, something along those lines would be ok with me.         ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200813</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:04:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200474</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : Sweet!  But they still don't have a failsafe number to roll to in case of an outage, do they?  Wasn't sure if they offered that yet]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200474</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:24:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200437</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : I know, I meant for 2 lines.  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200437</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:19:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200408</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : For 2 lines...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200408</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:15:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200222</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : A month's service credit with Vonage is $55?  Boy, that's almost what I pay for an entire year's of service with SR.  :D j/k     ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200222</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:47:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14199218</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : True...so they are shooting 50-50.  But when I do look at my account I do see a credit of $55 in there, so I will take that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14199218</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:21:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14199190</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1222778"><b>Xpmplay</b></A> : But you did not get it next day :P]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14199190</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:14:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14186996</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : Hmmm...no charge on my card...and I was credited a month's service.  If you return the old adapter within 14 days there is not a charge.  Sounds real to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14186996</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:31:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14178858</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1222778"><b>Xpmplay</b></A> : "I am happy at the current prices for what I save, and am considering adding an additional SR line along with my current 2 Vonage lines. <br>And Xpmplay, my Vonage router died this AM, should have another in hand by 9:30 am tomorrow. Seems alot faster than 7 days to me."<br><br>Yea, well enjoy the $99 charge to your card, and it won't be there the next day.Get real.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14178858</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:32:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14166469</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1053070"><b>rizzo2dial</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dipswich <A HREF="/useremail/u/832713"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Are you also wary of companies that use post office boxes?</DIV>I suppose it depends on the situation.  In this case, between VP running its business out of a UPS Store and the president personally handling a disputed credit card charge leads me to believe that VP is a fairly small shop.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14166469</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:13:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14166427</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1053070"><b>rizzo2dial</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Hooper <A HREF="/useremail/u/501473"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Doesn't VP also have a certain amount of minutes that you can't go over in the trial period like 300 or so? Were you also under those minutes? </DIV>I was WELL UNDER 300 minutes because I could hardly use the service the entire time I had it.  It wasn't until after I had sent in my cancellation request that I figured out (on my own) how to (somewhat) resolve the issue.<br><br>Rizzo]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14166427</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:08:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14166272</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/501473"><b>Hooper</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  rizzo2dial <A HREF="/useremail/u/1053070"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  georgepan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>If SR didn't exist I probably would choose Voicepulse.</DIV>I know they're considered one of the better VoIP services; however, I had some MAJOR issues with VP and how they conduct(ed) business:<br><br>1) I signed up for VP's $25/month plan (back when there was an annual contract).  At the time that I signed up, they advertised a 30 day trial period claiming that you could USE THE SERVICE FOR 30 DAYS.  However, (without adveristing it) they started that 30 day period from the moment I signed up, not the ~1 week later when I received my ATA.  That is not only false advertising, had I kept the service, I would have ended up paying for that 1 week of service while my ATA was in transit!  (I believe they have since modified their 30 day trial period to state that it starts from the moment you SIGN UP.  This IMO is still a bogus 30 day trial period, and it still charges customers for a week's worth of service they cannot use).<br><br>2) In the first week or so I had superb voice quality, but all of a sudden OUTBOUND calling quality went to h*ll.  Anybody I called said my voice quality was horrible.  I called myself on my cell phone to hear the quality, and it was beyond awful (garbled and vortex like sound).  VP initially responded saying the issue was my ISP and then did not respond to my numerous additional requests for help until I finally sent in my service cancellation request (on the 29th day after having received my ATA).<br><br>3) VP denied my money back guarantee (i.e. insisted I was under a 1 year contract) claiming I had made my reqyest after after 30 days.  Based on my SIGN UP DATE, I was indeed past 30 days (by about 5 days); however, based on my RECEIPT DATE of my ATA, I was only at the 29th day.  I ended up disputing the VP charges through my CC issuer; however, it was a hard fought battle.  Ravia Sakaria, President of VP, personally responded in writing to his CC merchant that the VP TOS stated that the 30 days began from the moment a customer signed up.   I followed up with detailed documentation from VP's web-site showing their advertised 30 day trial period (where at the time they said you could USE THE SERVICE for 30 days), a copy of my fedex shipment tracking (showing when I received the ATA), etc.  I ultimately won the dispute, but because of that ordeal, I wouldn't go near VP again (and would never encourage anybody else to do so as well).  I don't go so far as to tell people not to use VP; however, I don't recommend that company.<br><br>4) I have since learned that VP's US MAILING ADDRESS is nothing more than a UPS Store.  See for yourself:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.voicepulse.com/corporate/ContactUs.aspx" >www.voicepulse.com/corporate/ContactUs.aspx</A><br>VoicePulse Inc.<br>2227 US Highway One #224<br>North Brunswick, NJ 08902 <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.theupsstore.com/locations/locdet.asp?strCenterNum=MBE0888" >www.theupsstore.com/locations/lo&middot;&middot;&middot;=MBE0888</A><br>The UPS Store #0888<br>2227 US HWY 1<br>NORTH BRUNSWICK, NJ 08902-4402 <br><br>When you've got the President of a company personally responding to CC disputes, and when that company is running its business out of a UPS Store, I don't consider such a company to be "big." Of course that's just my opinion, and I know there are many satisfied VP customers here @ BBR.<br><br>Rizzo<br><br>P.S. Before sending my ATA (Sipura SPA-2000) back to VP, I finally figured out what condition would cause my ATA to go bad and how to cure it. I was using VP at a hotel w/ broadband internet access (where every few days there was an ISP outage).  Upon internet connectivity restoration, the ATA would get hosed (for OUTBOUND sound).  Powering down the ATA for an hour and then powering it back up would cure the problem.  I don't know if I really needed to wait a full hour; however, a quick power cycle (i.e. 5 minutes or less) did NOT cure the problem.  My co-worker on Packet8 (at the same hotel) did not suffer similar issues w/ his DTA-310.  (Thus, I considered this to be a VP issue).<br> </DIV>Doesn't VP also have a certain amount of minutes that you can't go over in the trial period like 300 or so? Were you also under those minutes?<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://dingman.bcalumni.org/npanxx.asp">Area Code & Exchange Lookup</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14166272</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:49:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14165927</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/832713"><b>dipswich</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  rizzo2dial <A HREF="/useremail/u/1053070"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>4) I have since learned that VP's US MAILING ADDRESS is nothing more than a UPS Store.  See for yourself:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.voicepulse.com/corporate/ContactUs.aspx" >www.voicepulse.com/corporate/ContactUs.aspx</A><br>VoicePulse Inc.<br>2227 US Highway One #224<br>North Brunswick, NJ 08902 <br></DIV>Are you also wary of companies that use post office boxes?  There really isn't that much difference, except that the couriers can also deliver to the PMBs.<br><br>The Postal Service is strict that the address says "PMB 224" or "#224" (instead of "Suite 224" or "Bldg 224") in order to protect against mail fraud and deception.  VoicePulse looks like they're doing it correctly, so I see no cause for concern there.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14165927</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:03:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14165555</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : I am happy at the current prices for what I save, and am considering adding an additional SR line along with my current 2 Vonage lines.  <br>And Xpmplay, my Vonage router died this AM, should have another in hand by 9:30 am tomorrow.  Seems alot faster than 7 days to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14165555</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:13:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14165518</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1225374"><b>VTBrendan</b></A> : I'll go on record with the prediction that $10/mo. or lower pricing will be standard within a couple of years, for unlimited US long distance.  And companies will be profitable at that price level.<br><br>-Brendan]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14165518</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:09:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14164942</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : BTW, my device broke on Sunday (Lightning storm that took out my cablemodem and effected my gizmo's phone port.)   I called SR up ON SUNDAY, was connected within a minute, explained the situation.  The guy asked me to plug a different phone cord and different phone in, and when I still had no dialtone he set up overnight shipping to go out that Monday.  <br><br>I received my gizmo on Tuesday morning. <br><br>Where in the world do you GET 1 to 2 weeks?   SR is one of the few VOIPs with active customer service on the weekend.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14164942</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:57:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14164922</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : XMPlay-<br><br>I consider your post a bit silly.  Do you have the service?  Many here do and our experiences are different from what you are painting here.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14164922</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:54:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14164895</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1222778"><b>Xpmplay</b></A> : Silly Silly Silly, just like Vonage, Sunrocket taken more then they can chew. Vonage is one of the most known all around the world, yet there CS sucks and you are lucky if you get any tech help within 7days? Will you be happy when your SR device breaks or something goes wrong and you don't get help for 1-2weeks? I don't think so. LOL]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14164895</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:50:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14161266</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085609"><b>Richard09</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  oddgeezer <A HREF="/useremail/u/1177554"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Yes.  There have been at least two large ads in Forbes magzine in the past 5 months<br> </DIV>Really?  I didn't know that they had placed ads in magazines with such a large distribution.  That sounds like a good sign to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14161266</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:03:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14158153</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : rizzo-<br><br>VP sounds like a very small company.  Of course VOIP does not require a lot in terms of space, manpower, etc.  You were definitely wronged.  Sounds eerily similar to my experiences with Broadvox.  I still have to get credit for the adapter I shipped back to them.  They also claimed that the trial period started the moment I ordered the service, not a week later when I received the adapter.  I was lucky enough to get someone on the phone who agreed with me that the trial should start upon receipt, and that a credit would be forthcoming.  Of course, since I never received the credit it was a shallow gesture (probably meant well, though.)<br><br>Within the context of this thread I found interesting what VPs president had said 1 1/2 years ago:   "Anything lower than $35 will have to be temporary," predicts Ravi Sakaria, president of VoIP provider VoicePulse. "I don't think that you can sustain prices much lower than we are now." <br>   <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-5101663.html" >news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-5101663.html</A><br><br>He could not have been more wrong.  The high justifiable price point for residential is $24.95.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14158153</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:41:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14157778</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1053070"><b>rizzo2dial</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  georgepan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>If SR didn't exist I probably would choose Voicepulse.</DIV>I know they're considered one of the better VoIP services; however, I had some MAJOR issues with VP and how they conduct(ed) business:<br><br>1) I signed up for VP's $25/month plan (back when there was an annual contract).  At the time that I signed up, they advertised a 30 day trial period claiming that you could USE THE SERVICE FOR 30 DAYS.  However, (without adveristing it) they started that 30 day period from the moment I signed up, not the ~1 week later when I received my ATA.  That is not only false advertising, had I kept the service, I would have ended up paying for that 1 week of service while my ATA was in transit!  (I believe they have since modified their 30 day trial period to state that it starts from the moment you SIGN UP.  This IMO is still a bogus 30 day trial period, and it still charges customers for a week's worth of service they cannot use).<br><br>2) In the first week or so I had superb voice quality, but all of a sudden OUTBOUND calling quality went to h*ll.  Anybody I called said my voice quality was horrible.  I called myself on my cell phone to hear the quality, and it was beyond awful (garbled and vortex like sound).  VP initially responded saying the issue was my ISP and then did not respond to my numerous additional requests for help until I finally sent in my service cancellation request (on the 29th day after having received my ATA).<br><br>3) VP denied my money back guarantee (i.e. insisted I was under a 1 year contract) claiming I had made my reqyest after after 30 days.  Based on my SIGN UP DATE, I was indeed past 30 days (by about 5 days); however, based on my RECEIPT DATE of my ATA, I was only at the 29th day.  I ended up disputing the VP charges through my CC issuer; however, it was a hard fought battle.  Ravia Sakaria, President of VP, personally responded in writing to his CC merchant that the VP TOS stated that the 30 days began from the moment a customer signed up.   I followed up with detailed documentation from VP's web-site showing their advertised 30 day trial period (where at the time they said you could USE THE SERVICE for 30 days), a copy of my fedex shipment tracking (showing when I received the ATA), etc.  I ultimately won the dispute, but because of that ordeal, I wouldn't go near VP again (and would never encourage anybody else to do so as well).  I don't go so far as to tell people not to use VP; however, I don't recommend that company.<br><br>4) I have since learned that VP's US MAILING ADDRESS is nothing more than a UPS Store.  See for yourself:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.voicepulse.com/corporate/ContactUs.aspx" >www.voicepulse.com/corporate/ContactUs.aspx</A><br>VoicePulse Inc.<br>2227 US Highway One #224<br>North Brunswick, NJ 08902 <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.theupsstore.com/locations/locdet.asp?strCenterNum=MBE0888" >www.theupsstore.com/locations/lo&middot;&middot;&middot;=MBE0888</A><br>The UPS Store #0888<br>2227 US HWY 1<br>NORTH BRUNSWICK, NJ 08902-4402 <br><br>When you've got the President of a company personally responding to CC disputes, and when that company is running its business out of a UPS Store, I don't consider such a company to be "big." Of course that's just my opinion, and I know there are many satisfied VP customers here @ BBR.<br><br>Rizzo<br><br>P.S. Before sending my ATA (Sipura SPA-2000) back to VP, I finally figured out what condition would cause my ATA to go bad and how to cure it. I was using VP at a hotel w/ broadband internet access (where every few days there was an ISP outage).  Upon internet connectivity restoration, the ATA would get hosed (for OUTBOUND sound).  Powering down the ATA for an hour and then powering it back up would cure the problem.  I don't know if I really needed to wait a full hour; however, a quick power cycle (i.e. 5 minutes or less) did NOT cure the problem.  My co-worker on Packet8 (at the same hotel) did not suffer similar issues w/ his DTA-310.  (Thus, I considered this to be a VP issue).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14157778</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:47:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14157179</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : XMPlay-<br><br>Why?  That makes little sense.  Sure, a company needs to make profit in the long run but why would I want the phone company of my choice to make lots of profits now?  During the customer generation phase the big fish (like Vonage, P8, SR) are content to lose money, but are well-financed for the long haul.   If companies need and want to make big profits now, that's good for them, but how is that good for me?   If SR were to "fall" down the road there are many other companies to choose from.   There is no logic in choosing your carrier based on future profitability, especially when it comes to a carrier like SR that pays all expenses, including shipping, setup, phones, etc.   If things get dicey there are plenty other companies one can hop onto within seconds.  <br><br>BTW, I would submit that a company like tiny BBTelsys is a poor choice for someone interested in a stable VOIP choice, but that is just my personal opinion.  If SR didn't exist I probably would choose Voicepulse.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14157179</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:29:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14155872</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : schultzy-<br><br>LMAO.  A way to get someone into trouble with their wife.  "Oh, honey.  There is a lady on the phone who claims that she saw your ad in LEATHERS AND CHAINS QUARTERLY.  What is wrong with you?"<br><br>Lorlov-<br><br>Posting your phone number as SR promo code is considered "frowned upon"  spamming and usually gets a mod delete.  It is one thing for someone interested in the service to offer using someone's promo code, preferrably via PM, but an entirely different matter to solicit via spam. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14155872</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:44:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14155688</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1177554"><b>oddgeezer</b></A> : Yes.  There have been at least two large ads in Forbes magzine in the past 5 months]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14155688</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:17:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14155648</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/736298"><b>Hilbe</b></A> : You don't need a promo code if you click on image of the phone on the main page (near the bird) of SunRocket.com.<br><SMALL>--<br>Hilbe<BR>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.sunrocketforum.com" >www.sunrocketforum.com</A><BR>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nuvioforum.com" >www.nuvioforum.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14155648</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:13:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14155620</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1175518"><b>schultzy</b></A> : Hey! Thanks, lorlov!<br><br>[adds to list of numbers to call in the middle of the night when I can't sleep]<br><br>[also adds to personals ad in "that" magazine]]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14155620</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:10:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14154734</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : Not the best idea sticking your "promo codes" here.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14154734</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:26:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14154663</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1198868"><b>lorlov</b></A> : Go Sunrocket.<br><br>I got my landline number ported to Sunrocket and it works great.  They made that number as my accounts primary.<br><br>Sunrocket is the google of VoIP, as someone already stated it in this forum or some other place.<br><br>Best,<br><br>/Leo/]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14154663</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:17:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14153776</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1222778"><b>Xpmplay</b></A> : Thank you very much, the PR people for SR are unreal.<br>However, back to your reply. I would not want to be with a company that is losing money and not making much profit in there 1/4 postings. Seems to me if you give more then you got, your going to fall hard somewhere down the line.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14153776</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:25:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14151014</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I've visited this forum 3 months ago when trying a VOIP provider. At that time I noticed that a few individuals post messages about SunRocket deal every day, and replies to every single criticism of SR. <br><br>I just looke at the discussion today and nothing changed.<br>Same people, same messages, like a TV ad that everybody knows by heart after a while.<br><br>No doubt, these people just paid advertisers of SR.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14151014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:29:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14150473</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : XPMPlay-<br><br> While BBTelsys has a $199.00 plan (like Sunrocket) it is the other stuff that SR gives away that makes the initial customer phase not profitable for SR.  We are talking about a $60 Uniden cordless 2-phone system, free shipping, no setup fees, no startup cost, second incoming line with voicemail, $3 in international call allowance.    <br><br>BBTelsys is far from having "this exact plan."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14150473</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:21:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14149264</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1222778"><b>Xpmplay</b></A> : Um...BBtelsys, has this same exact plan. Better customer support as far as I am concerned. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14149264</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:44:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14144910</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : Actually, they don't just engage in "word-of-mouth" advertising.  I found out that SR was available in my area when I received an advertising postcard in the mail. They also placed ads in various mags. They also do other things to advertise the product.  Not as much as Vonage by any means but more than most other, smaller VOIPs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14144910</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:43:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14144880</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/736298"><b>Hilbe</b></A> : If you click the phone the bird is sitting on (on the main page) you'll get the phones too.  No promo code needed...<br><SMALL>--<br>Hilbe<BR>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.sunrocketforum.com" >www.sunrocketforum.com</A><BR>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nuvioforum.com" >www.nuvioforum.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14144880</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:39:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14144687</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085609"><b>Richard09</b></A> : lorlov, that's a great post.  I hadn't thought about the annual plan that way before.  It really is an interesting idea.  I've been very happy with SR so far, i just hope they continue to be innovative in their thinking and progress.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14144687</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:02:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14141509</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/119880"><b>schipperke</b></A> : You forgot to mention the Gizmo, at no charge.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14141509</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:00:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14141291</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/916367"><b>Trill</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  georgepan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>jeff-<br><br>True.  I think referrals should be TRUE referrals (family, friends.)  Not begged for on an internet site.  Even worse, pretended to be THE actual "one and only" Sunrocket referral code to obtain these rewards.    <br> </DIV>If I were to sign up for SR (No chance since VP has been stellar for me) because of the info I receive here, I would certainly love to give someone a free month of service in the process. I don't care if you are a total stranger. I do think that you should be upfront about it.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14141291</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:29:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14141098</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/886460"><b>frogli</b></A> : ALL OF THESE REASONS ARE WHY SUNROCKET GET'S MY $16.58<br><br>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTTTTTT    VONAGE ANYMORE]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14141098</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:58:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14141059</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/186761"><b>koam</b></A> : i received several multi-page full-color direct mail pieces from SR.  each envelope contained several cards.  each time they sent it, the price was lower.<br><SMALL>--<br>Danieli Consulting LLC, Strategy and Branding &raquo;<A HREF="http://kdanieli.com" >kdanieli.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14141059</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:53:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14140462</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1198868"><b>lorlov</b></A> : Hi VoIPShoppers and all Sunrocket happy customers,<br><br>I just want to add my 2 cents about this money making machine behind the Sunrocket's $199 annual plan.<br><br>- $200 per year no interest loan.  You times that the number of customers it will result in some great chunk of cash, which you can reinvest into the expenses to grow i.e.  business growth.<br><br>- $200 sure annual income (assuming they know that they must keep their customers happy) Personally I like this one because I know that it also insures that they'll be here next year and year after. We all know how much it takes to loose your business with our latest technologies, like forum, emails, and etc.<br><br>- word-of-mouth advertising = zero spending on advertising, which is very very expensive.<br><br>- Quantity of new customers as well as the base of the existing customers, will insure positive cash flow = company growth and success.<br><br>- Currently all the VoIP Service providers, including Sunrocket, are piggy-back riding all the broadbend internet service providers, like Comcast and others.  I am sure all of those corporations have teams of lawyers working on schema to start charging the VoIP service providers some form of usage fees, similar to "dry DSL" but today it is free for them (VoIP providers) to sell their VoIP service at no cost for broadbend usage.<br><br>- In addition... they are using open-source software for their systems, which is another great way to save a buck or few.<br><br>- and I am sure there are numbers of other reasons, which we are not aware at this moment.<br><br>But while supply lost... Sunrocket VoIP is the great/best way to save money on phone services for us, all VoIP customers. If you like to test drive the latest technology, VoIP is great.  Yes, there are minor drawbacks and some outages, with which my home phone callers, including myself can live without any stress.<br><br>Another happy Sunrocket customer,<br><br>/Leo/<br><br>P.S. Yes, word-of-moth advertising pays off at both ends.  If you want to get two free cordless phones when you sign up with Runrocket, you gotta use promo codes :o]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14140462</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:17:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13507138</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1179360"><b>peeeeeter</b></A> : Don't underestimate the cost savings of only having to bill their customers once a year.<br><br>At their sales volume, they probably pay about $.15 per credit card transaction.  So, Sunrocket pays that to Visa/MC once a year, where Vonage pays it 12 times a year.  So, take $.15 x 11 x number of customers, and that is how much SR saves on Visa/MC bills compared to a VIOP service that bills monthly.  <br><br>But, the real savings is in the labor and time cost savings involved in the monthly billing.<br><br>Whatever it costs in payroll per failed or expired credit card number times a percentage of customers who never pay (lost income all together compared to getting it all upfront), etc., and I think it's a smart move.<br><br>I'm in the web hosting business, which is low margin, and it makes perfect sense to me.  With a low margin like that, 2 - 3 months of a single customer's profit can be lost in billing costs.  Add that to the reduced risk of customers deciding not to re-up each month, and you have a sound business case for the reduced cost once a year plan.<br><br>Peter<br>hostingopensource.com<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.hostingopensource.com" >www.hostingopensource.com</A><br>peter "at" hostingopensource.com]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13507138</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 02:15:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13476156</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I don't know if they are making a profit, but SR is great.  The price is fair, the service is good and the serice people are great.<br><br>I've been through more Phone Companies then I'd like to admit, and SR is the best.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13476156</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 16:27:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13465804</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856374"><b>jester121</b></A> : Back to the original subject...<br><br>We've been with SR since Feb or March 05 -- tried it for a few weeks, then ported over the SBC number and shut off the $70/month money sucking POTS line.  <br><br>Sunrocket is making money on customers like me -- people who need to have a land line (me, for business), but who don't spend much time on the phone.  We're probably less than 500 minutes total per month, about 25% long distance, no international.  However, I'd MUCH rather pay $199/year for a feature rich service than overpay for SBC + long distance.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13465804</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 02:54:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13465122</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1118643"><b>GTFan</b></A> : <I>rabkin sez:  Anyone have some words of encouragement for me?</I><br><br>It's cheap and it has a lot of features, but it might not be there when you want to use it.  Does that help?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13465122</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 00:18:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13463063</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/900508"><b>spm9999</b></A> : Hang in there......  VOIP is still in it's infancy. It's not going to be perfect. I wouldn't even notice most of the outages if it wasn't for this forum. Only a few times was I in need and couldn't make a call. I do have a cell phone though..<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.menofart.com" >www.menofart.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13463063</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 18:00:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13462819</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1207339"><b>rabkin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  georgepan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Perhaps SR will operate this way for 1-2 years, generate a huge & loyal customer base, wait for enough competitors to fold, and then raise rates to the point where they can make some money (but w/o gouging the consumer).<br> </DIV>All this depends on whether or not SR can generate this loyalty. So far, I've reluctantly hung on through some really poor customer service experiences and numerous outages just hoping it will get better. Anyone have some words of encouragement for me?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13462819</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 17:06:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13462305</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <br>The Addition : <br><br>Residential unlimited plan !!!  <br><br>I can puke when i read this on websites from VoIP Providers. :o]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13462305</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 15:38:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13462143</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/900508"><b>spm9999</b></A> : If you can't affort $199 you probably can't afford $50 a month. Nothing is for free in this world unfortunately.. Well once in a while..<br><br>If I didn't have the $199 I would of done the month by month plan. Still half the price or better than SBC.<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.menofart.com" >www.menofart.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13462143</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 15:06:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13461668</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : "True. I think referrals should be TRUE referrals (family, friends.) Not begged for on an internet site. Even worse, pretended to be THE actual "one and only" Sunrocket referral code to obtain these rewards."<br><br>OK, just for kicks I dialed <B>6782293930 </B> and the voicemail message said "You have reached the voice mail for Jerry and Angela Whitehead..." ROFL :D ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13461668</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 13:52:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13461570</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : jeff-<br><br>True.  I think referrals should be TRUE referrals (family, friends.)  Not begged for on an internet site.  Even worse, pretended to be THE actual "one and only" Sunrocket referral code to obtain these rewards.    ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13461570</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 13:38:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13461470</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1021902"><b>jeffnyc</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by GARainmain:</SMALL><BR><BR>I'm kind of wondering what you mean by nice try?  It's a perfectly VALID promo code.  It works.  Try it.<br> </DIV>I'm sure it works and I'm also sure you get the $25 points referral bonus if they use your phone number as a code.   But anyone could just click on the phone the birds standing on and not hook you up with the bonus.  For that matter all of us SR customers could be posting our phone numbers to use as referral codes...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13461470</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 13:21:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13461031</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : Building a customer base is one thing.  Keeping it is the other.  If Sunrocket offers the same type of deal when my one year contract runs out, I'll jump on it again.  I am happy with the service and don't want to try someone else's.   However, if SR raises rates beyond reasonable when my contract is up (March 2006) then I'll be looking around.   There will always be alternatives in VOIP, the beauty of competition keeping everybody else "honest."<br><br>   SR has done a lot for consumers in terms of suppressing prices, but others aren't bad either and they try to lure with lower prices or more features.  SR won't go belly up, but if they go in with another company you look at the deal they offer then and decide whether to stay with them or move onto someone else.   By then someone else may have come onto the scene to replace SR as the low-cost leader.   <br><br>That's the beauty of VOIP (unlike Cell, ISP or POTS):  A new company can, with very little startup-cost, offer quality service at a very low price by piece-mealing services together from already existing providers.   The "under $20 all-you-can-eat VOIP" is here to stay and will probably go below $15 before too long.  A no-frills provider can easily make money even at that price point or there'll be another SR which offers below $15 per month service while giving away a bunch of goodies, operating at a loss for a while to build a large customer base.   I don't see that changing in the near future.  We can probably go for years with low-cost providers.  If SR and TIME WARNER merge there'll be other low-cost providers picking up where SR left off.<br><br>I believe SR will continue to grow and stay around as one of the strongest independent VOIP's through the "CABLE AND POTS going full VOIP" wars, even lowering the prices a bit from the current level as provider's per minute rates continue to fall.     In the event of a merger, as long as they continue to offer full service at a reasonable "under $20" price point they can continue to have my business (and referrals.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13461031</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 12:04:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13460237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/119880"><b>schipperke</b></A> : <I>This is a venture capital play pure and simple. The goal is to get lots of subscribers fast, then sell out</I><br><br>Exactly<br>Sunrocket is a BlueRun Ventures deal.  Look at all the "successful companies", they were all roll ups.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13460237</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 09:10:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13460230</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1040472"><b>PJIV</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  RockyBB <A HREF="/useremail/u/1150905"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>hey spm9999!  although $199 might not be a lot to you, there are plenty of posters on this forum looking for free service, cheapest service, unlimited service... yesterday one dude even wanted to make free calls on Packet 8 without becoming a customer.  For students, or disabled, or fixed-income, or just having a tough time, $199 is a lot to come up with, and a lot to lose if SR fails.  that's why I suggested the m-t-m plan...<br> </DIV>Umm, this may be true but given the options out there, however Sunrocket is the cheapest startup cost.  If you do the math, it would be better to charge the $199, and then pay it off month to month, then joining Vonage, Packet8, etc you'll save in the long run.<br><br>Also if you are on a fixed income, you would be looking to save money, and most likely high speed internet is not saving money, but that's neither here nor there.  Sunrocket is a great deal for $199 and can not be beat!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13460230</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 09:08:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13460149</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1150905"><b>RockyBB</b></A> : hey spm9999!  although $199 might not be a lot to you, there are plenty of posters on this forum looking for free service, cheapest service, unlimited service... yesterday one dude even wanted to make free calls on Packet 8 without becoming a customer.  For students, or disabled, or fixed-income, or just having a tough time, $199 is a lot to come up with, and a lot to lose if SR fails.  that's why I suggested the m-t-m plan...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13460149</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 08:43:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13459215</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The question is "How many of SR's subscribers actually pay the $199 up front?"  So, the average price per subscriber might not be $16.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13459215</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 01:28:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13458698</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1158312"><b>electrode5</b></A> : Guys come on. This has nothing to do with being a long-term business for SR or Vonage. This is a venture capital play pure and simple. The goal is to get lots of subscribers fast, then either sell out (probably will end up being a Bell or a cable company- they will end up controlling VOIP space in 3 to 5 years) or do an IPO and cash out.  The investors behind SR is Nokia Capital, a venture capitalist. Again, these companies will not exist in more than 3 years as independent companies- probably no more than 18 months to 2 years. They don't care about profits. They care about bulking up and controlling lots of subscribers.  Count on it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13458698</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 23:40:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13458498</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/900508"><b>spm9999</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  RockyBB <A HREF="/useremail/u/1150905"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  lstevens <A HREF="/useremail/u/674555"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Those that find SR's marketing offer to be compelling should enroll, recognizing that their $199 is at risk.  Not my cup of tea, but different strokes for different folks. (BTW the free phones are not showing up on SR's website today, unless they're hidden or disclosed during the signup process.)  Personally, if someone wanted to try SR, I'd advise the month to month plan only...if all is as everyone says, it's still worth $25/month...  Avoid making no-interest loans...<br> </DIV>At risk? A whole $199. I was paying SBC over $50 a month. I have been with Sunrocket for 4 months. If they go belly up this month then at the worst I broke even. I will go without a home phone line if SR goes down. I have a cell phone that will have to be good enough. I will NEVER give SBC another dime of my paycheck.<br><br>Long live Sunrocket<br><br>wasn't that corny!<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.menofart.com" >www.menofart.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13458498</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 23:09:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13457211</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : You're right but they have a solid business plan.  Do you know much about video game consoles?  When Microsoft entered that market they sold Xbox systems at a big loss.  They gained in the end, however, as they went from having no market presence to a huge market presence in that sector due to low costs bringing in tons of customers.<br><br>Sunrocket is bringing in tons of customers now, and they will likey raise prices in a year or so to match competition levels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13457211</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 20:17:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13455024</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1103424"><b>DiskDrive</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  georgepan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Could it be that because of the complete lack of advertising, relying strictly on word-of-mouth and internet mindshare, </DIV>If memory serves me correctly, I received snail-mail spam from SunRocket a few weeks ago...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13455024</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 15:23:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454895</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/152822"><b>hoffa3</b></A> : Exactly. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454895</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 15:05:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454514</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625831"><b>med1234</b></A> : I think what may keep in business is the fact that after a year most of the current customers will sign-up for another year at 199.00 or so, plus many new one's.  The rate of new customer sign-up's will drop but they will be sitting on a bunch of cash by then from the 199.00 advance from current custiomers for another year and new sign-up's.  Year two almost all of first years customers re-sign + new customers = maybe what SR is betting on to stay in business.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454514</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 14:20:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454447</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : lstevens-<br><br>Actually, it takes less time.  My last two Verizon bills were outrageous.  $100 each month.  Sunrocket had to stay in business for only 2 months (they did) and I broke even on my purchase, the following 10 months are pure gravy.  Actually, since I was paid $25 for each of my first 8 referrals and $10 for each subsequent referral I have actually made money on this deal already and got my entire year's worth of phone service at no charge.  <br><br>Come to think of it, I didn't even include the large referral cash awards ($25 for the first 8) in my list of things Sunrocket pays out initially to build their customer base, although that is obviously quite a substantial investment in new customers.  For instance, in my case, I referred 14 clients to this service so far, so Sunrocket paid me $260.00.  I already used $200 of it in Amazon.com cash, the other $60 are pending (not quite 31 days yet.)    A huge investment to gain lots of customers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454447</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 14:12:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454407</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I'm kind of wondering what you mean by nice try?  It's a perfectly VALID promo code.  It works.  Try it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454407</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 14:08:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454313</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/674555"><b>lstevens</b></A> : actually, given the minimum value of the phones at $60, they would only have to stay in business 7 months for you to break even... almost guaranteed with VC backing...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454313</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 13:56:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454273</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : nice try, Gar, using your phone number as promo code.  Maybe someone will bite.  <br><br>rocky-<br><br>Yes, month to month is $19.95 with a code (let me know if you need the code and I'll dig it up for you) and you still get the 2 free phones.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454273</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 13:51:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454211</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : If you want the free phones, enter the promo code:<br>XXXXXXXXXXX on the main screen and it'll give you the free phones.  You may have to call them afterwards to get them to send them to you...my Gizmo showed up without them.<br><br><I>Moderator note:  Removed referral, posting of referrals are not permitted.</I>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454211</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 13:42:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454106</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1106467"><b>artisticcheese</b></A> : I think you still can get $20 a month deal with some coupon and if you want to get free phones you need to have a referal from existing customer or click on phone bird is standing on (intersting idea).<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.windowsvsunix.com" >www.windowsvsunix.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454106</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 13:27:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454094</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1150905"><b>RockyBB</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  lstevens <A HREF="/useremail/u/674555"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Sunrocket has substantial VC money from a very experienced VC Firm who validated their business plan in excruciating detail before investing...<br> </DIV>that's good to know ... the bosses got their seed money from someone else ... first rule of a good businessman, put someone else's money at risk!<br><br>my statements were, of course, complete speculation (i.e. pulled out of my butt) based on some (not all possible) information and my own life experiences.  and, of course, my guidance is provided free of charge with no guarantee of anything.  you get what you pay for.<br><br>I find nothing nefarious in SR's marketing offer, and I don't think that they're swindlers or crooks.  Perhaps you'll note a degree of envy in my comments!<br><br>Those that find SR's marketing offer to be compelling should enroll, recognizing that their $199 is at risk.  Not my cup of tea, but different strokes for different folks. (BTW the free phones are not showing up on SR's website today, unless they're hidden or disclosed during the signup process.)  Personally, if someone wanted to try SR, I'd advise the month to month plan only...if all is as everyone says, it's still worth $25/month...  Avoid making no-interest loans...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13454094</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 13:25:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453958</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/674555"><b>lstevens</b></A> : they got my business, and so far, three of my friends/family]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453958</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 13:07:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453904</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : VOIPShopper-<br><br>I believe you actually get more features with Sunrocket vs. Vonage at about half the price.  <br><br>Let's compare, in short form:<br><br>Both offer many features that are identical, so let's put those aside.  Both have excellent call quality due to the codecs used.  Both had very minor outage issues recently.  <br><br>Differences:<br><br>Vonage:<br><br>- Vonage offers softphone at $4.99 add'l.  <br>- Ability to have toll-free incoming at $4.99 add'l. <br>- Repeat Dialing<br>- In-network calls<br>- Call Transfer<br><br>SR: <br><br>- SR includes a signature number.  Vonage has one available, but it is $5 more per month.  <br>- Signature number includes voicemail and is fully customizable as for setup features (# of rings, forwarding, voicemail notification, etc.) Not with Vonage.<br>- Both have "Int'l call block", but SR has "Anonymous Call block" and "411 Call Block"<br>- Message screener software (allows call intercept while message is being left.)<br>- Advanced Voicemail Notification Features: Cell Phone, IM, e-mail, pager.<br>- E-911 is included.  Vonage does not offer E-911, but will have to in the future.  <br><br>Price advantages in addition to the much lower base price:<br><br>-SR has $3.00 call allowance for int'l calls (100 free minutes to Germany and UK, as an example)<br>- SR's international rates are lower than Vonage's<br>-  SR gives away two 411 calls per month, then charges $0.75 for each thereafter.  Vonage:  $0.99 cents for each right away.   <br><br>Since both services have similar call quality and reliability (SR's reliability rating is actually higher) Vonage shouldn't be exactly double the price for the same thing.  For myself I HAVE to have the signature number for my wife.  If I were to add that to a Vonage account not only do I pay $33.00 (exactly double what I pay SR) but I still don't get voicemail with Vonage's version of it, a deal-breaker, as my wife wants her own voicemail box.<br><br>Startup cost with SR is zero, with Vonage:  $30 setup fee, $10 shipping cost, over $3 in taxes.   Taxes come back every month, bringing the $24.95 plan to an actual "paid" $27.25 deal.  With SR taxes are included in the total.  <br><br>And, don't forget the nifty 2-phone cordless speakerphone system SR gives away.  :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453904</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 12:59:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453333</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/674555"><b>lstevens</b></A> : Sunrocket has substantial VC money from a very experienced VC Firm who validated their business plan in excruciating detail before investing...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453333</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 11:36:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453313</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  RockyBB <A HREF="/useremail/u/1150905"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>...<br>I'll not yet withdraw my Ponzi analogy, but there are other less inflammatory analogies ... grocery CO-OPs and mutual insurance companies come to mind.  ... </DIV>AOL]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453313</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 11:34:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453049</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1150905"><b>RockyBB</b></A> : Hey georgepan, I wasn't predicting SR's collapse ... predicting only that IF the growth stops, THEN it would collapse.  <br><br>It's obvious reading threads on this board that SR has a marketing plan that has appeal, that it has run its service in a way that inspires enthusiasm, and that they appear to be a responsible carrier that is succeeding at fulfilling its claims.<br><br>That said, you really really really have to admit that the CFO is calling the webmaster twice a day to learn what the signup counts are ... knowing that his CLEC bills are due, that his bandwidth bill is due, that his LD bills are due, his IT bills are due, his Uniden bill is due, his payroll is due ... The $199 is the fuel for the SR engine ... we read about P8's stock placement, and Vonage's private investments ... sure SR is private, and we can't know for sure, but my crystal ball says that SR's day to day working capital funding comes from its users instead of from professional investors that have evaluated the risk and can afford to lose it all...<br><br>I'll not yet withdraw my Ponzi analogy, but there are other less inflammatory analogies ... grocery CO-OPs and mutual insurance companies come to mind.  Those companies return cash dividends to their "user/investors."  SR seems to be providing its "dividends" in the form of discounted service rates relative to it competitors.<br><br>Nothing wrong with that...again everything is disclosed (we hope).  Would make a good business school case ... "how to start a company by borrowing money at no interest from your customers for services that they could buy elsewhere without having to make the loan"...  It sure makes sense that they're ex-MCI guys!<br><br>:D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13453049</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 11:00:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452684</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/152765"><b>mack1951</b></A> : I agee with a lot that was said here, I think the one thing that is missing is that they are a privetly help company.  Perhaps their plan is to build a large customer base, do an IPO and make a big winfall for the original investors.  If that happens it will be interesting to see how they continue to operate when they have share holders looking for bigger profits to answer to.<br><SMALL>--<br>THE ROAD: Romans 3:23, 6:23, 5:8, 10:9</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452684</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 10:05:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452645</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Maybe SR is just getting ahead of other VoIP providers, who will slide down to SR's price as the competition continues to bubble up.  Or perhaps that's all their service is worth at this point, and it's simply priced to the market.  <br><br>In the end, success or failure will depend upon the quality and reliability of their service.  Price is important but it isn't everything. Any advice for this VoIP shopper regarding their service -- based upon your actual experience?  The question isn't whether you're getting your $16.58 worth:  It's whether at $16.58 you're getting Vonage's $24.99 worth...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452645</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 09:58:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452511</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : cbrain-<br><br>The stated Sunrocket philosophy is very different from any POTS and VOIP, so it is safe to assume that the 3 individuals think the way you do about the Worldcom's of the world.  But who knows for sure?  The advantage of VOIP is that companies don't have to spend Billions of Dollars building infrastructure and backbones.  They can piggyback onto existing technology and thus offer service for much less.   I believe after first losing money on "generating" their customer base SR will run profit, even at their low rates.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452511</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 09:33:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452441</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : artisticcheese-<br><br>Actually, Vonage is not profitable right now.  They are counting on their advertising to build a customer base large enough to eventually bring in profits.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452441</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 09:21:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452437</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  georgepan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Besides, those running the company are former MCI executives who had been responsible for very successful and profitable innovative platforms.  They are not likely to engage in a temporary Ponzi scheme.    <br> </DIV>You are aware of the relationship of MCI to Worldcom and its history?  <br><br>This is not necessarily a reflection on the people at SunRocket but ...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452437</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 09:20:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452403</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : Rocky-<br><br>Predictions of a collapse are a bit far-fetched without actual knowledge of true numbers.  Service cost has been coming down tremendously, so they can probably make it happen at the price point they are currently offering.  Of course initially they are "investing" in their customer base in lieu of advertising, but after the initial investment they should be able to run profits from thereon out.   After reading some industry articles on how low cost per minute has dropped just in the last few months I believe that the $20 threshhold that is commonly seen as the break-even point for providing unlimited VOIP may be a bit high.  In the long run they can probably make money at the $17.00 price point, as long as they don't continue to give away expensive goodies every year.  :-)<br><br>Besides, those running the company are former MCI executives who had been responsible for very successful and profitable innovative platforms.  They are not likely to engage in a temporary Ponzi scheme.    ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452403</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 09:14:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452282</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1106467"><b>artisticcheese</b></A> : Is not Vonage spends $200 to a acquire a new customer? If they are profitable then so in Sunrocket since they don't spend $200 to acquire a new customer since they rely on word of mouth of promoting their services and according to this newsgroups it looks like working. <br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.windowsvsunix.com" >www.windowsvsunix.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452282</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 08:49:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452262</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1015096"><b>voiplover</b></A> : I agree with a lot of this. Quite simply, they have deep enough pockets to buy over enough customers @ $199/year. It is a gamble and a race to build a voip company. If things work out their five year plan will work. It's comparable to the $99 alarm systems that raked in huge monitoring for companies like ADT. Generally they are looking for an 18 month return per subscriber, then it is all gravy. ;)<br>If they can, I think that they we keep the $199 deal if it works.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452262</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 08:43:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452248</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1029759"><b>tj008</b></A> : They are no more a scheme than Packet8 is.  P8 takes investors money by selling stock. And weve all seen how valuable the stock is lately. (At least with SR, you get phone service with your money. ;) )<br><br>SR management/directors have grown a different business model for their voip co.  They tell you everything up front, no "gotchas", plus when you recieve the package there is more documentation inside than any other voip provider Ive used - including a Subscriber Agreement.  If nothing else, they present an image both on website and packaging that they are in business and doing well.<br><br>The $199 yearly plan, if managed correctly, could earn them much more during the years time.  <br><br>As with any provider, only time will tell.  So far it looks like they are doing fine.  They are hitting on all cylinders - ordering, fullfillment, packaging, customer service, website, tech support, marketing, etc.  My hat off to 'em!<br><br>:)<br><br>  <br><SMALL>--<br>DSL.  Voip providers: Lingo (UTStarcomm), SIPphone, FWD.  Voip providers on trial:  Nuvio, SunRocket. Tried:  wIPphone=rates OK, Teleo=great, no ATA, Broadvoice=great until..., will give em another chance.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452248</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 08:38:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452146</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1150905"><b>RockyBB</b></A> : The $199 is a no-interest loan... all the SR cheerleaders are  arranging for working capital cheaper than any bank.  It covers the wholesale cost of all the "freebies" and to establish the service.  Assuming that they continue to grow the business, and folks continue to make the loans, then everything is covered.  It's kind of like a Ponzi scheme, where the new money pays for the old business... (I'm not making any allegation of anything wrong or illegal or unethical... everything is disclosed.)  Once the growth stops, and the cash stops rolling in, then SR collapses...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452146</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 08:07:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452089</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : I don't think Sunrocket has a parent company.  They have investors, though.    I doubt they could go belly-up at this point, at least not this year.  They are signing too many customers up at this point, most at the $199.00 deal, so for a while they are probably going to be quite flush with cash because they are getting all this upfront money.    <br><br>Could it be that because of the complete lack of advertising, relying strictly on word-of-mouth and internet mindshare, that they can actually make a profit at that lower price point?  <br><br>I would like to see some sort of profit/loss statement from them to gauge that.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452089</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 07:51:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452058</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/122800"><b>mreg</b></A> : Remember, however, that it's not quite $16.58 a month that's dribbling in.  It's $199 up front.  That's per customer who's paid annually.  That's a lot of money.  Used wisely, and assuming they're operating in good faith, there's lots of ways to make money with all that money.  I wouldn't cry for them just yet... :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13452058</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 07:40:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13451973</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1053070"><b>rizzo2dial</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  georgepan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>They port existing phone lines over to their service at no additional cost.  Most others either don't offer line porting or charge extra for it.</DIV>I agree w/ pretty much everything you wrote except for the above.  Which VoIP is dumb enough to charge for LNP?!<br><br>There is one potential risk to all who've signed up for the $199 plan:<br><br>If SR decides to end that plan (for new subscribers), and a little over 2 months thereafter they go out of business (or bankrupt), if they can't afford to provide pro-rated refunds, all remaining pre-paid dollars are pretty much lost to the consumers.<br><br>Why?  CC companies only allow you to dispute charges up to 60 days old.  That's why I qualified the above w/ SR waiting a little over 2 months.  The chargeback window for even the most recent $199 customer would be closed.<br><br>The above is unlikely; however, playing devil's advocate points out at least one potential way the consumer can get screwed on the $199 deal.<br><br>I tend to agree w/ the idea that the $199 plan is SR's way of promoting their service w/o spending additional advertising dollars.  After all, one of the most effective ways to generate business is from WORD OF MOUTH, presumably by satisfied customers.<br><br>Perhaps SR will operate this way for 1-2 years, generate a huge & loyal customer base, wait for enough competitors to fold, and then raise rates to the point where they can make some money (but w/o gouging the consumer).<br><br>Perhaps SR's parent company is using SR as a means to write off SRs losses against other profitable segments.<br><br>Only time will tell what will become of SR (and all the other VoIPs).<br><br>Rizzo]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13451973</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 07:07:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per mo</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13451938</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1171721"><b>rhymemaze</b></A> : Good post.  This topic is brushed on a lot I've noticed.  The other day, someone mentioned that SR is monitoring the posts on this forum.  I would like to hear from someone at SR ( Oh I don't know, Joyce Dorris maybe, though not likely) and get a general rundown of their 1 year and 5 year plans, as well as finding out what makes the company tick.      <br><br>I keep hearing that SR will fade away, not last, etc.<br>It's funny, because every time I navigate over here to broadbandreports.com, there is an increasing number of positive reviews on the home page.  I personally think that they are going to blow up (customer base) over the next year based on the way they handle their business.  Only time will tell if they last, but I think they are doing what consumers love to see,  a "straight forward, no nonsense" approach.         <br><br>I don't know the customer base numbers for vonage and SR, but, my feelings are that SR is creeping up as a legitimate competitor ( please feel free to school me on these numbers).  <br><br>oh well, more power to SR.  Thanks for doing what the others  would not even consider.  <br><br>  <br><br>   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13451938</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 06:49:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>SUNROCKET can&#x27;t be profitable at $16.58 per month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13451864</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1201327"><b>georgepan</b></A> : SR is refreshingly different from other VOIP's, but I don't see how they can possibly be making any money at this time.  They may be more concerned with building a loyal customer base, or to "build a better phone company" :-)  at a current loss but with profit later on. <br><br> Think about it:<br><br>SR basically charges $16.58 per month (using the $199/yr. plan) for unlimited local and national calling when common wisdom puts the break-even point for such unlimited plans at $20.   <br><br>On top they give away a free 2-phone system (I've seen the phones for $90 plus tax at my local Office Depot store or as low as $63 at Amazon.com)  They don't even ask for the phones back if someone leaves for another service, it just becomes a "free gift."   I am sure many took advantage of that freebie, even if they had no intention to join a VOIP to begin with.  They are paying their supplier probably about $30 themselves for each phone system with the potential to lose all of it to someone just wanting a quick way to get some nice phones.  <br><br>Then they include E-911, which others charge for or don't offer at all.  They've included this service for free since they started, and it does cost them extra to provide.  As you can see in the news and other threads, the other VOIP's are scrambling to come up with the extra resources to provide E-911.  Market leader Vonage's president doesn't think they can do it even before the 120-day deadline, but hopes that "if the FCC sees a genuine effort made" that it would be enough.  Yet, Sunrocket includes it without much fanfare and the few pockets in their system that don't have it yet are promised to have it up and running within 30 days.<br><br>Then they give away an extra free $3 in international minutes (works out to be 100 free minutes to Germany and the UK at 3 cents per minute, other countries vary)  Assuming they pay half the amount for these int'l calls to their providers, that is still $1.50 that comes off the $16.58 they generate off each user if the user takes advantage of these extra minutes.  <br><br> They don't charge any shipping cost at all, no startup cost or setup fee.  Never a cancellation fee.  They don't tie customers into a long-term contract with obligatory cancellation penalties.  There are tremendous costs involved shipping the rather large starter-kit, which they absorb instead of passing it onto the customer like most VOIPs.<br><br>They include Canada in their "Unlimited" calling plan, something not every VOIP provider can do, as it costs extra.  <br><br>They give away, as part of their base plan, a second number for free (a so-called SIGNATURE NUMBER) which can be used for another family member or to split up business and personal calls.  This second number comes with it's own voicemail box, distinctive ring and allows the same full setup that the PRIMARY NUMBER allows (distinctive ring, several call forwarding features, message notification, etc.)  They also allow that second number to be an ANYWHERE number, a number setup in a different area code to make calls to your phone a local call for those living in that area code.  Others either don't offer a secondary number at all or, if they do,  they charge extra for it.  The few services that actually offer a secondary number in their base plan for free only offer a distinctive ring, never with full voicemail setup and full customization. <br><br>I have yet to see a single board message about someone using their Sunrocket phone "too much," in other words, triggering a mechanism or being told that they have to curb their calling habits or have their service cancelled alltogether, as has happened with several other VOIP's.  SR's Unlimited is truly Unlimited, not capped at 2000 or 3000 minutes, apparently.<br><br>They port existing phone lines over to their service at no additional cost.  Most others either don't offer line porting or charge extra for it.<br><br>Their tech support is available until midnight, other VOIPs provide much less tech support (For example, Broadvox tech support shuts down at 7 every day)<br><br>Talking to Sunrocket tech support yesterday I was told to expect a lot of free upgrades over the summer.  Full 100% fax support is promised (it currently works about 75% of the time,) activation of the second phone port on the gizmo, Microsoft Outlook integration/import in the Address book/Contacts area,  etc.  From the sound of it their engineers are addressing compatibility issues and are working on innovations for the current system.   <br><br>How can Sunrocket afford to do all that and keep the cost below $17 per month?  <br><br>Have they streamlined to the point where they can be profitable at under $13.00 income per user?   Are they just ok with losing money for the first year or two to then emerge as one of the few remaining VOIP's with a huge customer base?<br><br>I hope they don't eventually become another Vonage or Packet 8, offering desired features a la carte at additional cost and start passing dubious "FCC Recovery Fees" or "Excise taxes" onto the consumer.  Right now they act like the complete opposite of that, but who knows if they get bought out eventually and what happens then.    I am glad I signed up for the $199/yr. plan, as that should give me price protection for at least the first full year, even if they have to ask for more money from their monthly customers after summer. <br><br>  I can't see how they can make any money at all at this point, but considering that Vonage invests about $300.00 in each customer in advertising cost (TV ads, newspaper, internet banners, etc.) Sunrocket may be content to invest half of that in initial customer generating cost via word-of-mouth and freebies (with no advertising whatsoever) at an overall loss, hoping to build a base of customers that swells to the point of overall profitability.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13451864</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 06:04:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
