<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP? in Wireless Service Providers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13379385</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:16:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:16:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13429623</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/650040"><b>BigCreek</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  John Galt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Or this...</DIV>That must be the best electrified Outhouse I've ever seen ;-)<br><SMALL>--<br>SBC Pro Static DSL; Linux.  Terrific wife & kids; live on a farm by Big Creek. Software & network consultant.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13429623</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 14:57:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13429102</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><b>John Galt</b></A> : Or this...<br><br>I like the wind generator. It works when Mr. Sol is hiding 'round the backside.<br><br>;)<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/13429102?c=826091&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxMzM3OTM4NS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="41655 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=322 HEIGHT=480 SRC="/r0/download/826091~ebcb2e0713235f197b6f1ccfb9b3250d/SOLAR_WIND_POWER_SITE.jpg"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13429102</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 13:53:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13428904</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><b>John Galt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pmurdock <A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>It is an 80 watt panel.. I may just want to add another panel.. :) </DIV>I was going to suggest that...!<br><br>;)<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13428904</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 13:26:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13427061</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : It is an 80 watt panel.. I may just want to add another panel.. :)<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13427061</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 09:26:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13425073</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><b>John Galt</b></A> : That reminds me...<br><br>How many watts is your panel?<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13425073</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 23:35:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13424594</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1024542"><b>jdmarti1</b></A> : What kind of AP are you using???<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://magicwisp.com" >magicwisp.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13424594</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 22:42:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13383668</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1128197"><b>wispman</b></A> : Are you talking about d link or something?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13383668</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 15:03:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13383448</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/741604"><b>CapinPete</b></A> : I'm sure an access point with a built in switch will consume a bit more power, yes.  However, it should be a lot less than an access point AND a switch.  An access point with a built in switch should not cost much more than just a switch.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13383448</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 14:33:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13383391</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : Well, for one an access point with a four port switch built in will draw more power.. and second.. it is less expensive to add a four port switch than replace the whole access point am I wrong?<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13383391</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 14:26:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13382820</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/741604"><b>CapinPete</b></A> : Am I missing something?  Why cant you replace your access point with another access point that has a 4 port switch built in?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13382820</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 13:04:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13382684</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/901298"><b>Semaphore</b></A> : I agree with NWN & Daggar... I did say it does work..... electronically, and from a network perspective, it's terrible. It won't use any power, but it will likely induce high collisions.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13382684</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 12:46:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381990</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/896254"><b>daggardale</b></A> : I used a simple splitter device like this a few years back.  The collision rate was terrible, but it worked.  Here's a link to a cheap one, if you're interested.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cablesnmor.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=698" >www.cablesnmor.com/index.asp?Pag&middot;&middot;&middot;odID=698</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381990</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 10:58:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381984</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/965437"><b>nwn</b></A> : Looking for trouble here.  The ports are not designed for this.  They are designed to connect to 1 other device.  This <B>may</B> work, if you can get your new device to put the ethernet port into a high-impedance state, so it looks invisible, when not operating.  I doubt that it will work, though, unless the other device does the same.<br>Ethernet works by toggling the voltage from 0 volts to x volts between the transmit pair wires.  If one device tries to drive the voltage to 0 and the other is not transmitting, the second device will do its best to maintain the x voltage.  The current sourced from device 2 will go way up, E = IR, and to get to 0 volts R will be 0.<br>This is the reason for hubs, so every device can manage its own transmit pair.<br><SMALL>--<br>Scott</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381984</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 10:57:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381655</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/348012"><b>cmaenginsb</b></A> : Well you can try it and tell us how the idea works.<br><br>As to current, higher voltage is not higher "pressure" many people tend to make this mistake.<br><br>Instead to understand the equations think this way, Watts is a payload of sand.  Voltage is the number of dumptrucks you have to carry the sand.  Amperage is the number of trips they make.<br><br>If the amount of sand stays constant if you increase the number of dumptrucks it will take less trips.  The relationship between volts and amps is similiar.  Amperage is a function not of things being forced but how much energy the device needs to operate.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381655</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:59:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381597</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : Ok.. so what we have is the new device - the battery voltage device will only ever be active for 5 seconds each hour to transmit it's voltage back to the data center.. So in essence I guess the two devices never need to talk to each other. Here is a drawing that I have made to represent the design..<br><br>Basically what will happen is a server in the NOC will send out a UDP request to the battery monitor asking for it to send back the voltage every hour. It will only need to respond with a very small packet and then go back to sleep (drawing microamps current - now that is what I call small! :) )<br><br>Bear in mind also this is a far-away repeater in the middle of nowhere.. with a very limited potential client base.. I'd be happy with a 1Mbps connection to this location and not worry about saturation..<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/13381597?c=822650&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxMzM3OTM4NS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="10250 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=556 HEIGHT=409 SRC="/r0/download/822650~48820780b184cc3e55b51137dc28f117/example.gif"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381597</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:50:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381510</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/901298"><b>Semaphore</b></A> : If the required layout is that two devices need to talk to one device then a passive Ethernet splitter would work. Yes they make them. I haven't installed one in over a year but they allow two PC's to share a single Ethernet drop. You can't get Full Duplex but you can get 100Mbps. Yes collisions are problem. No the to devices can't talk to each other directly. Ugly but it does "work".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381510</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:32:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381492</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : It will be run from a 12V sealed gel cell 285 Amp/hour battery that is charged by some photovoltaic cells.. So the 7.5 v supply is better than the 10V minimum requirement.. however 52 mA versus 300 mA doesn't make sense.. well the equation makes sense.. :)<br><br>for 52 mA switch<br><br>P = IV<br><br>2 watts = (I)*10 volts      ->    I = 2/10   ->  I = 0.2 amps<br><br>for ~300 mA switch<br><br>P = IV<br><br>1.5 watts = (I)*7.5 volts   ->   I = 1.5/7.5   -> I = 0.2<br><br>so it appears that the parvus one is better.. though 200 mA is a horrible draw to have for both of the switches.. :( is that a continuous draw..?<br><br>I would think that the draw would be higher at a higher voltage since voltage is like "pressure" if you applying a higher pressure more current would want to flow through the system. So why only draw 52 mA @ 24VDC and draw MORE current (~200 mA) @ 10VDC? This is what I don't see.<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381492</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:30:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381441</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><b>John Galt</b></A> : What is your system voltage?<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381441</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:22:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381403</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : Here's another one I found.. made by Parvus<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.parvus.com/products/IODatacom/EthernetFirewireUSBSerial/Switch104/" >www.parvus.com/products/IODataco&middot;&middot;&middot;itch104/</A><br><br>Says it is a 1.5 Watt, as opposed to the 2 Watt usage by the other one. Though at 5 volts, the P=IV equation says it will draw 300 mA.. how can that be lower than the 52 mA device that draws 2 Watts.?!?<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381403</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:16:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381389</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><b>John Galt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pmurdock <A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Does anyone have a feel for what a "low power" switch should be.. is 52 mA really the best we can do? </DIV>That's pretty low...!<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381389</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:13:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381371</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : looks like it is 7.5 Watts.. maybe I'm better off going with that ethernet switch up at the top that consumes 2 Watts or 52 mA @ 24VDC.<br><br>I see what you mean about tying which wires together.. that does present a problem. As it is now, they are a cross over direct connect.<br><br>Does anyone have a feel for what a "low power" switch should be.. is 52 mA really the best we can do?<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381371</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:09:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381352</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/901298"><b>Semaphore</b></A> : The Solar Pop and battery layout please. It's not something we need to do immediately, but it would be beneficial in the future.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13381352</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:05:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380608</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1024542"><b>jdmarti1</b></A> : My biggest concern would be to create a chance for collisions on my backhaul.  That is a very important link.  This little unit only takes one watt.  I am unsure what voltages you have on your power supply, so you either use the wall wart with this or use the 7.5v.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.trendnet.com/products/TE100-S5P.htm" >www.trendnet.com/products/TE100-S5P.htm</A><br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://magicwisp.com" >magicwisp.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380608</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 03:31:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380593</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/965263"><b>wysockib10</b></A> : What type of equipment are you using? If you are using 802.11b for your AP you could look into tranzeo wireless they have a radio with two ethernets.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380593</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 03:23:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380433</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/348012"><b>cmaenginsb</b></A> : I don't think you can splice 3 connections together.  You can try it though and let us know.<br><br>It's not a matter of collision detection, it's how you tie the tx and rx pairs together.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380433</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 02:14:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380380</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/565356"><b>public</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pmurdock <A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>I'm not so sure about that.. A hub is useful where you need to repeat the signal over larger distances.<br><br>However, the ethernet protocol is a CSMA/<B>CD</B> protocol, which implies "C"ollision "D"etection.. this means that a number of transmitters theorectically could be on the EXACT same wires and still be able to communicate as I understand it. When a collision occurs a random backoff period happens and then the two transmit again at different times.. simply by splicing the wires together indeed I will create the opportunities for collisions to occur, but it still should work? :)<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul<br> </DIV>That applies to original thick wire ethernet.<br>Read up on 10baseT requirements.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380380</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 01:56:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380319</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : I'm not so sure about that.. A hub is useful where you need to repeat the signal over larger distances.<br><br>However, the ethernet protocol is a CSMA/<B>CD</B> protocol, which implies "C"ollision "D"etection.. this means that a number of transmitters theorectically could be on the EXACT same wires and still be able to communicate as I understand it. When a collision occurs a random backoff period happens and then the two transmit again at different times.. simply by splicing the wires together indeed I will create the opportunities for collisions to occur, but it still should work? :)<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13380319</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 01:40:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13379406</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/565356"><b>public</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pmurdock <A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>isn't that all I really need though is a way to splice the cables together?<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul<br> </DIV>No. Ethernet twisted pair needs a hub.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13379406</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 23:07:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13379385</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : isn't that all I really need though is a way to splice the cables together?<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13379385</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 23:05:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13379375</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/565356"><b>public</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pmurdock <A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>If I do go with an Ethernet switch what about this one?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.controlsysteminnovators.com/itm00045.htm" >www.controlsysteminnovators.com/itm00045.htm</A><br><br>It shows a power draw of 52 mA with all 5 ports linked up worst case scenario. I will have 3 of those ports so perhaps the current draw will be ~30 mA of constant draw. That's gonna drain the battery BIG time! All just to add a device to allow me to watch the battery because drainage is already an issue!<br><br> </DIV>You need either a hub or a switch. Both draw power. There is no such thing as a passive ethernet splitter.<br>You can find a lot cheaper one.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13379375</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 23:04:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378857</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/650040"><b>BigCreek</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pmurdock <A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=11180&item=5773610308&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW" >cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi&middot;&middot;&middot;ame=WDVW</A><br></DIV>I believe that's just a patch panel. Note the first description line:<br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Use in Conjunction with an Active 10/100 Base-T Switching Hub<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Here's the manu's page:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.hometech.com/techwire/vanco.html" >www.hometech.com/techwire/vanco.html</A><br><SMALL>--<br>SBC Pro Static DSL; Linux.  Terrific wife & kids; live on a farm by Big Creek. Software & network consultant.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378857</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 22:02:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378755</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : I was thinking of something like this..<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=11180&item=5773610308&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW" >cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi&middot;&middot;&middot;ame=WDVW</A><br><br>and then just wire up the ports to all be the same wires.. should work.. ? :)<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378755</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 21:52:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378713</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/650040"><b>BigCreek</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pmurdock <A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>I've found a number of ethernet splitters, any suggestions on a good approach or should I just manually wire the connectors together.</DIV>Could you post links for some of them so we could see what exactly they are.<br><SMALL>--<br>SBC Pro Static DSL; Linux.  Terrific wife & kids; live on a farm by Big Creek. Software & network consultant.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378713</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 21:48:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378652</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : If I do go with an Ethernet switch what about this one?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.controlsysteminnovators.com/itm00045.htm" >www.controlsysteminnovators.com/itm00045.htm</A><br><br>It shows a power draw of 52 mA with all 5 ports linked up worst case scenario. I will have 3 of those ports so perhaps the current draw will be ~30 mA of constant draw. That's gonna drain the battery BIG time! All just to add a device to allow me to watch the battery because drainage is already an issue!<br><br>I've found a number of ethernet splitters, any suggestions on a good approach or should I just manually wire the connectors together.<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378652</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 21:41:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378505</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : Basically this is what I have setup. The backhaul radio comes into a PVC box and has a female RJ-45 connector on it - which currently connects directly to 1 access point. I want in essence to "split" off that 1 female port into two female ports - (1) one for the AP, and (2) two for the battery voltage monitor. Don't really think there is a need for a powered hub is there? The cable distances are all less than 10 feet.<br><br>the pics - of the solar pop or the battery voltage monitor? :)<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378505</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 21:26:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378422</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/650040"><b>BigCreek</b></A> : Unless I'm missing something, I don't think a splitter is going to do what you want. They're good for stuffing two Ethernet devices onto one cat5 cable but you still need the ports at the other end.<br><br>You need some type of Ethernet hub or switch to connect three devices together.<br><br>Perhaps Google for "low power ethernet switch" and see what turns up.<br><SMALL>--<br>SBC Pro Static DSL; Linux.  Terrific wife & kids; live on a farm by Big Creek. Software & network consultant.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378422</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 21:15:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378144</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/901298"><b>Semaphore</b></A> : I've used splitters before for customers that were to cheap to install another Ethernet drop, or even a hub. From an electrical isolation point of view I'm sure they suck. But they work... and even a small hub draws a ridiculous amount of power.<br><br>BTW... Got pics? I'd love some pointers :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13378144</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 20:43:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>hub or switch at solar powered POP?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13377964</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/474948"><b>pmurdock</b></A> : I want to add a battery voltage monitoring device to a solar POP that I have, and I will be creating a microcontroller based circuit board with an Ethernet connection on it so I can query the device every hour to see the voltage of the battery and graph it in cacti.<br><br>HOWEVER.. ;) my question is - I currently have the access point and the backhaul radio directly plugged into each other. So there are no RJ-45 ports for me to connect this battery monitor to.<br><br>Question is : Would a simple 2 port ethernet hub (ie just a splitter and no power usage) work sufficiently or should I put a low power consumption ethernet switch in there. I don't want to add too much of a current load just for the battery monitor. The ethernet physical layer should know how to deal with shared ethernet with automatic backoff and whatnot during a time when the battery monitor and radios want to communicate on the line - I would imagine right? :)<br><br>cheers,<br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13377964</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 20:22:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
