http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13265417 en Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:00:05 EDT Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:00:05 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13269414 Nerdtalker : It probably still will, although not as good as their super-duper anti-spyware program. :D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13269414 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:55:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13269395 ArchAngel21x : Does this mean than NAV will no longer eliminate spyware?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13269395 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:53:44 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13269210 Nerdtalker : Even the consumer versions of Norton AVs have had "anti-spyware" functionality since NAV 2004.

I don't blame them for wanting to capitalize on the growing antispyware market.

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13269210 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:28:35 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13265417 anon : symantec needs to stick with virus protection & let microsoft handle the spyware removal.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13265417 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:59:00 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13265396 Minvaren : I agree, it can be an alert to if a certain machine on the network may need some "TLC" in a corporate environment.

So far, though, it's been seemingly-random as to which files get marked for deletion, and which are skipped. Either way, it helps out some.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13265396 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:56:01 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13264866 elboricua : Symantec AV 9.0 Corporate has antispyware capabilities. Not very good but they are there. Just like this beta version it fails to capture all spyware. also at least with the SAV 9.0 it will remove the files in questions but not the associated registry/startup entries. I was wondering when Symantec was going to give their own separate client a whirl.
--
Sending script kiddies to /dev/null since 1995!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13264866 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:40:56 EDT