<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Awesome! in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13207389</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:59:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:59:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Awesome!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13212480</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/891208"><b>jwsmiths4</b></A> : Yeah but as has been noted elsewhere there have been examples of people actually successfully suing companies that failed to abide by their User EULAs...  It was just a cool thought.<br><br>Justin]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13212480</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:09:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Awesome!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13207905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/811675"><b>cdru</b></A> : It would never hold up in any court.  It has about as much chance as writing "Account paid in full" on a partial credit card payment.  Just because it's there doesn't mean it holds any water.<br><SMALL>--<br>Win some of $250 in prizes.  Try your luck with <A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/578uh">The Amazing Race Contest</A>.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13207905</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:21:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Awesome!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13207389</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/891208"><b>jwsmiths4</b></A> : Would be very interesting to see if this really would hold up in court -- not that I'd count on it, but it would be a cool case to see none the less.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13207389</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:18:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
