<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13079023</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:10:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:10:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13083428</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/175582"><b>elias</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  osme <A HREF="/useremail/u/470925"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Other than download size, though, it makes little difference. It retains your settings, bookmarks and plugins, the only thing I have to do is delete the setup file from my desktop when it's done. Works for me.<br> </DIV>Check your add/remove programs. You'll see the other versions listed still.<br><br>-- Elias<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="/forum/disco">Crunching the Midnight Oil</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13083428</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:43:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079736</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548921"><b>reub2000</b></A> : I though MS only started denying patches to to pirated copies of windows recently.<br><br>Either way, there is very little excuse for having Code Red 2 on your server.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079736</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:28:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079714</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I don't think that ranting and raving about how long it takes to download a 5MB file using a dial up connection is going to "further" many minds. I would rather listen to someone complain about how badly muffled the sound is when they use a tin can and waxed string for a telephone.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079714</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:26:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DSL vs Dialup Users and Big Updates...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079698</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/480150"><b>sabardeyn</b></A> : Seems a bit strange to me that this discussion is taking place on <B>BROADBAND</B>reports. (No slur intended of the site.) At this location opinions are going to be a bit skewed.<br><br>With that said, I'm currently on dialup. I find some of these huge updates annoying, but not impossible. While I understand that complex software is most likely to need a large and complex patch/update, I hardly think it's unreasonable to want programmers to write the tightest, most secure code they can conceive.<br><br>Really that is all that I think any of us Dialup users want.. Oh wait, so do the DSL users! :)<br><SMALL>--<br>Sabardeyn</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079698</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:24:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079225</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/352846"><b>antdude</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  jansm38 <A HREF="/useremail/u/813996"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by Tech-2005:</SMALL><br><br>Why are you using dialup to download Firefox ?  Why would you bother with Broadband Reports web site if you only use dialup ?  Firefox downloads in about 10 seconds for me and for most people on BBR.  I don't see how you can compare the monstrous 90MB Service Pack 2 downloads as a download "WIN" for Microsoft over independent programming groups for Firefox. Ultimately, I don't really understand the value in your posting those particular comments.<br> </DIV>There are dial-up forums on BBR as well as other non broadband related formums.  I think it's a very valid point that people on dialup will be very reluctant to download large updates.</DIV>Yep, there is more to broadband discussisons in this awesome Web site. Security news, broadband services/issues, etc.<br><SMALL>--<br>Ant @ The Ant Farm: &raquo;<A HREF="http://antfarm.ma.cx" >antfarm.ma.cx</A> ... Please do not IM/e-mail me for technical support. Use the forum (I check almost daily)! Disclaimer: The views expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079225</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:06:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079030</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Internet Explorer "updates" are frequently just as large. And really, who cares about dial-up users? Software updates written for computers with massive hard drives and +1 gigabyte of memory are naturally going to be too large to be quickly downloaded by anyone using a 56k modem. The world isn't going to stop turning because some people (most likely AOL users) refuse to give up their modems, vitrolas and 78 RPM LPs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079030</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:32:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079023</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/128384"><b>BlitzenZeus</b></A> : I've downloaded all my updates via dial-up, even the network install of SP2 with the use of a download manager at night over a couple nights.  Most people are spoiled when it comes to speed, along with needing to have everything instantly, I still remember using modems rated in BAUD, not bps aka bits per second.  I don't even use my connection enough to warrant paying for a broadband connection, and unlike some people might think, it doesn't take all day to download a few MBs of data, its abound 1MB every 3-4 minutes on a good connection, and if the data is plan text you can get some really good compression with stac compression to get up to 20KB per second of pure ascii text, like when doing newsgroups, etc..<br><SMALL>--<br><B>My hourly rates:</B><BR>$25 per hour.<BR>$35 per hour if you want to watch.<BR>$45 per hour if you want to help.<BR>$75 per hour if you tried to fix it, and failed.<BR><B>The biggest error is sitting in front of your keyboard.</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13079023</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:31:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>NO PATIENCE</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13078969</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/905952"><b>slimpickinz</b></A> : I ALSO think it's a very valid point that people on dialup will be very reluctant to patch their systems with MS Updates, very reluctant to update their AV, etc etc....<br>Those with no patience are usually the ones who have the most trouble anyway.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13078969</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:23:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be safe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13078934</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1008293"><b>thender2</b></A> : 14 MB, oh no! What shall I do? :o<br><br>Who gives a crap? This is broadbandreports.com, not dialupreports.com. <br><br>A dialup user could finish that file in an hour or so if he kept his connection running. There are many programs that are much bigger. Why should they have to cater to dialup users for? <br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/1s6x">The Problem With Music.</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/6edef">Our Rationale</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/3m7eg">Time to rewrite the DMCA.</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13078934</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:17:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13078723</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/698757"><b>nixen</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  reub2000 <A HREF="/useremail/u/548921"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Obviously Microsofts updating thingys aren't good enough.<br><br>Look at what I found in my apache logs:<br><div class="code"><PRE><span class="codetext">"GET /default.ida?XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX<br> *XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX<br> *XX<br> *XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u<br> *90<br> *90%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u9090%u8190%u00c3%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u<br> *53<br> *ff%u0078%u0000%u00=a HTTP/1.0" 404 278<br> <br>(*) WARNING 1 long line(s) split<br><br>(*) WARNING 3 long line(s) split</SPAN></PRE></DIV> </DIV>Given the number of pirated (and unpatched) copies of Windows running around out there, the above log entry says nothing about Microsoft's "updating thingy".<br><br>-tom<br><br><SMALL>--<br>"Some people have morals, standards and ideals about quality, but I'm an American: I couldn't care less." --Tony Pierce (paraphrased)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13078723</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:41:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13078542</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548921"><b>reub2000</b></A> : Obviously Microsofts updating thingys aren't good enough.<br><br>Look at what I found in my apache logs:<br><div class="code"><PRE><span class="codetext">"GET /default.ida?XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX<br> *XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX<br> *XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u90<br> *90%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u9090%u8190%u00c3%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53<br> *ff%u0078%u0000%u00=a HTTP/1.0" 404 278<br><br>(*) WARNING 1 long line(s) split</SPAN></PRE></DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13078542</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:04:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13077576</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/336278"><b>Rammer</b></A> : i was on dial up for years and was member of bbr also for years<br>maybe he was like me i had no other connection but dial up<br>and i looked here on these forums almost every day<br>for years also<br>i did it too keep up on things as you learn a lot here<br>so why should he not be here<br>i have never seen any thing that says --dial up --not allowed here<br>people who wish too learn should do what ever it takes<br>to further the minds]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13077576</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:19:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dial-Up Updates</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13077120</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/220461"><b>sherman10570</b></A> : It should be noted that most people probably have broadband already and don't know it - Verizon Wireless.  I'm not sure about the other carriers, but VZW offers free (as in used minutes / unlimited off-peak) ISDN-like service over their wireless network.  Using a USB cable with my LG VX6000, I can get 10-15 kilobytes/sec download for no additional monthly charge.<br><br>14MB isn't that bad at 15k/sec.  For $80/month, Verizon also offers their 300-500 kilobit/sec (40-60 kilobytes/sec) service in select major markets (ISDN-like service in the others).<br><br>While I sympathize with users stuck without broadband, most companies have made the jump into large file sizes for drivers/updates/etc:<br><br>Microsoft Windows XP SP2: 266MB<br>Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4: 129MB<br>Microsoft Office 2003 SP1: 72MB<br>Microsoft DirectX 9.0c: 34MB<br><br>NVIDIA 71.84 Video Driver: 18MB<br><br>ATI 5.3 Video Driver (Full package): 30MB<br>ATI 5.3 Video Driver (Driver only): 8MB<br><br>- Sherman<br><br>==================================================<br><br>Edit: Link to <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/archive/myvzw.com?s=110&r=984">myvzw.com speed test results</A> here @ BBR (mine tested 110/110)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13077120</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:04:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13077055</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/470925"><b>osme</b></A> : 14MB is the total size of all the updates thus far. The whole thing is still less than 5MB, which takes less than half an hour on dialup. This guy is literally making a big deal out of nothing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13077055</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:55:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076988</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/813996"><b>jansm38</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by Tech-2005:</SMALL><BR><BR>Why are you using dialup to download Firefox ?  Why would you bother with Broadband Reports web site if you only use dialup ?  Firefox downloads in about 10 seconds for me and for most people on BBR.  I don't see how you can compare the monstrous 90MB Service Pack 2 downloads as a download "WIN" for Microsoft over independent programming groups for Firefox. Ultimately, I don't really understand the value in your posting those particular comments.<br> </DIV>There are dial-up forums on BBR as well as other non broadband related formums.  I think it's a very valid point that people on dialup will be very reluctant to download large updates.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076988</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:43:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076804</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/821660"><b>SpitefulCrow</b></A> : That Ivan guy was trolling the weblog, didn't you read the rest of the comments? He wanted a free lunch in terms of a new feature/improvement now, spewed "advice" on the subject, and then said he didn't want to help add this feature to the project. Useless comments.<br><br>A binary patch system <I>is</I> in the works for release sometime around Firefox 1.5, if what the replies to Mr. Icin said were correct. Until then, you have broadband, 14MB takes less than 30 seconds to download over a decent cable connection, so you can put up with it until then. Just think of the fact that since I use Gentoo Linux, I have to download a 30-something MB source code package and compile it to install these minor updates. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076804</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:08:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076796</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Why are you using dialup to download Firefox ?  Why would you bother with Broadband Reports web site if you only use dialup ?  Firefox downloads in about 10 seconds for me and for most people on BBR.  I don't see how you can compare the monstrous 90MB Service Pack 2 downloads as a download "WIN" for Microsoft over independent programming groups for Firefox. Ultimately, I don't really understand the value in your posting those particular comments.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076796</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:08:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076787</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1068003"><b>Dryvlyne</b></A> : Hmm, I didn't have to do a full re-install when I update from 1.0.1 to 1.0.2. I think they just say to do that as a precaution. I did have to re-download the entire setup installer, although that was no big deal cause I'm on DSL :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076787</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:05:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be sa</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076744</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/470925"><b>osme</b></A> : Other than download size, though, it makes little difference. It retains your settings, bookmarks and plugins, the only thing I have to do is delete the setup file from my desktop when it's done. Works for me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076744</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:57:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Full re-install has to end if Firefox to be safe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076633</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : When you go to the link mentioned in the story, I found an interesting comment about a Firefox flaw that needs fixing. And that is that a full re-install of the product is needed after every little fix comes out for the product. What Firefox needs is a system that can implement minor releases with a system that can replace portions of the code.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/007880.html" >weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/arch&middot;&middot;&middot;880.html</A><br><div class="bquote">I can't remember any application with worse update system than Firefox. With 14 MB in less than two months you really can't expect your dial-up users to be up to date.<br><br>Good occasion is that it is unlikely that there won't be spyware for Firefox for some time, so you can do something about that. But if you don't take this case urgently (read it 1.1) you're risking safeness of your users.<br><br>Oh, not to forget that update system is bad not just from the point of its bulkniess, but also from the point of its inteface.<br><br>It is redicilous that MS is taking a strong win in something that should be your area.<br><br>Posted by: Ivan Icin on April 2, 2005 11:53 AM <br></DIV>I fully agree.<br><br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/4zmr3"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://spaces.msn.com/members/tkjunkmail/"><B>My Blog</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13076633</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:33:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
