<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Whats next then? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12909412</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:36:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:36:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Whats next then?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12912131</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/932022"><b>pcscdma</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  sancraig <A HREF="/useremail/u/895577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>In my opinion anything that is not stated in the constituition as a charged duty is a waste of tax dollars.<br> </DIV>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html" >www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html</A><br><SMALL>--<br>"The bad news is that we are told that Michael Powell, one of Washington's better bureaucrats, is calling it quits today after four years at the helm of the Federal Communications Commission." - WSJ 2005/01/21</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12912131</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:27:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Whats next then?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12911638</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/895577"><b>sancraig</b></A> : But see every city, state and federal govt is bound by certain responibilities. All vary depending on their founders, Most deal with the protection of their citzens,education and taxation.In my opinion anything that is not stated in the constituition as a charged duty is a waste of tax dollars. Sure, cheap broadband would be great but I dont feel that the entire city should be taxed to subsidize it. What about the people that dont even own a computer should their taxes raise cause of this? Or is it for the better good for all.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12911638</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:27:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Whats next then?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12911128</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/932022"><b>pcscdma</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  gammaone <A HREF="/useremail/u/1007354"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Cities should not be providing services<br> </DIV>I have to agree with that. As of now I am no longer using the services of Winterset Municipal Utilities.<br><br>Good thing my notebook has a 2-3 hour battery backup!<br><SMALL>--<br>"The bad news is that we are told that Michael Powell, one of Washington's better bureaucrats, is calling it quits today after four years at the helm of the Federal Communications Commission." - WSJ 2005/01/21</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12911128</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:37:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Whats next then?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12910949</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/711922"><b>bjbrock</b></A> : As long as they have to compete, let the sevices begin.<br><br>I doubt the would be able to compete against anything except utility companies.  The only thing more wasteful than government are utilities. Utilities are actually rewarded for wasting.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12910949</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:15:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Whats next then?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12910214</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/415309"><b>djm61</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  gammaone <A HREF="/useremail/u/1007354"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>If it were to succeed...<br>Cities should not be providing services<br> </DIV>Hmmm... let's see...<br><br>Police   Yep, a service.<br>Fire dept.   Yep, a service<br>Library   Yep, a service.<br>EMT's  Yep, a service.<br>City water system   Yep, a service.<br><br>I could go on and on. Cities are in the business of providing services to the residents.<br><br>The real reason that the ILECs don't wont cities providing broadband access is they can't abide the competition. In most of the places where the municipality has installed BB access for the benefit of their citizens the have done it for a cheaper price and provided better service than the ILECs have on their best day!<br><br>Dave <br><SMALL>--<br><B>Secrecy</B> is the beginning of <B>Tyranny!</B> Keep your powder dry; the next four years are going to be interesting! In any mature society the term "civil servant" equates to "civil master"!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12910214</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:48:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Whats next then?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12909412</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1007354"><b>gammaone</b></A> : If it were to succeed and the city begain providing wifi to the public.. what would be next? Suppose they decided to start providing whatever service your company does? What then?<br><br>Cities should not be providing services]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12909412</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:10:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
