<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Good move on Verizons part in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12900522</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:21:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:21:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Good move on Verizons part</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12900522</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/535085"><b>Bill</b></A> : Verizon is making itself look good by doing this.<br><br>They are sharing their network even though they don't have to.  They are trying to make themselves not look like money hungry businessmen, in my opinion.<br><br>The big question I'd have is exactly how much would FIOS be through a third-party provider?  Is it going to be much more expensive?  Or will it be the same, like it is right now with third-party DSL providers?  According to DSL Extreme, it's too early in their plans to say how much it'll cost.<br><SMALL>--<br>The new <A HREF="http://www.secure-wifi.net">Secure-Wifi.net</A>  is open!<BR></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12900522</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:45:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
