<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: a toothless load of cra................... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12890829</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:49:55 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:49:55 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: a toothless load of cra...................</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12890829</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/657733"><b>owenhome</b></A> : I honestly think what's going to happen is spyware will be legalized rather than banned.  And the purveyors of which will hide behind this act effectively putting the federal stamp of approval on it.  Add to that the false sense of security it will give people and OMG, look out.<br><br>"Spyware is illegal, this _must_ be OK."<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  sivran <A HREF="/useremail/u/874811"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Ah, but if a man gains your permission to enter by false pretenses, and you then decide you want him out, he must leave or he is trespassing. ;)</DIV>But, when you doorbell rings, do you open the door and just walk away without ever looking to see who it is you just let in?  And do you instantaneously forget who it was and what they wanted?  Do you look the other way and never notice as they walk out the door with your wallet, TV, VCR, and every other thing they can find?  And after they're gone, and you've been looted, do you yell down the street saying "HEY, YOU GET OUT OF HERE!"?<br><br>Addressing user ignorance is the first step.  All of the dotes out there will be basking in the warm glow of this act as they clink through every little box that passes in front of them. <br> <br><SMALL>--<br>Never argue with a fool, people might not know the difference.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12890829</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:43:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: a toothless load of cra...................</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12883917</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874811"><b>sivran</b></A> : Ah, but if a man gains your permission to enter by false pretenses, and you then decide you want him out, he must leave or he is trespassing. ;)<br><br>Thus, you can agree, then change your mind, and if the junk doesn't provide a way for you to change your mind.. well, then it's trespassing.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.againsttcpa.com/">TCPA </A>- Treacherous Computing<BR><A HREF="http://download.kerio.com/dwn/kpf/kerio-pf-2.1.5-en-win.exe">Kerio 2.1.5</A> - Best damn firewall<BR>Home licensing should be just that.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12883917</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:45:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: a toothless load of cra...................</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12883601</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/532660"><b>Taranis</b></A> : Damn good post Owenhome... :) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12883601</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:20:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: a toothless load of cra...................</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12883137</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/218971"><b>woody7</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Doctor Four <A HREF="/useremail/u/197199"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>If you think about it, this is going to be like Can-Spam<br>for spyware. And about as effective, too.<br><br>The law as it is being proposed, is rather weak, and I<br>wouldn't be surprised if the marketing lobby have their<br>hands in the lawmakers' pockets already.<br> </DIV>or down their pants<br><SMALL>--<br>BlooMe</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12883137</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:55:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: a toothless load of cra...................</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12882472</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/197199"><b>Doctor Four</b></A> : If you think about it, this is going to be like Can-Spam<br>for spyware. And about as effective, too.<br><br>The law as it is being proposed, is rather weak, and I<br>wouldn't be surprised if the marketing lobby have their<br>hands in the lawmakers' pockets already.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Kayura or Badamon, whichever you are, you should know that I will never give up this battle. By the will of the Ancient, I shall succeed!" - Shuten (Anubis) from the Ronin Warriors.To RIAA/MPAA - You can sue but you can't catch everyone!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12882472</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:23:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>a toothless load of cra...................</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12882287</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/657733"><b>owenhome</b></A> : See, that's the biggest part of the problem, the EULA.  It makes no difference if they make a law for "cyber trespass".<br><br>A GREAT DEAL of "spyware" is installed, unwittingly, by click happy users who have NO IDEA what they just clicked, much less agreed to.  And there's the catch.  They <I>agreed</I> to it.  If I let somebody in my front door, willingly, they ARE NOT trespassing.  They were <I>invited.</I><br><br>If you get a popup, "In order to view this page, you must click yes to install <B>update for internet explorer</B>"........blah blah blabidy blah........."by clicking yes you agree to.........blah blah blo blah blee."<br><br>"OH! UMMMMM DUMMMMM DEEEEE DUMMMMMM uh UPDATE! OH OH, update!!!!  I am supposed to do that"<br><br>Yes yes yes.......next next next.........<br><br><B>BANG</B><br><br>You are infarcted.<br><br>AND, you <B>AGREED</B> to install this junk, and you <B>AGREED</B> to let it do anything it wants to, YOU installed it!  It wasn't some automated, underhanded, sneaky thing, it flat out asked, and you said <B>YES</B><br><br>Now, <B>here</B> is where the problem lies.  It does NO GOOD to pass some load of crap just to pacify public outcry.  If you SAY YES, it's not trespassing, and thusly NOT AFFECTED BY THIS ACT!<br><br>NOTHING, short of user education, training, and READING, will help get past these threats.  This "Act" serves no purpose other than to make the public feel as though there "government" is doing "something" about "something".  It will solve nothing.<br><SMALL>--<br>Never argue with a fool, people might not know the difference.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12882287</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:02:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
