<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Now only if we had another PhD candidate in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12882226</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:14:53 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:14:53 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Now only if we had another PhD candidate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12882226</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : From what I understand, with Windows boxes....<br><br>1. Windows Client connects to our discovery device (this could be a web site etc...)<br>2. Windows client has timestamps turned off. syn/ack begins.<br>3. discovery device replies to the windows box with timestamp information included.<br>4. Windows box ignores that timestamps are turned off and decides to send timestamps in return. Hummmm windows is such a smart OS.<br><br>Then fingerprinting can begin. Still unsure of even if this method of fingerprinting is valid but I would assure you that if it is, it will not be patched by OS vendors if the vunerability is patched it may defeat the efforts of our goverment. May I remind everyone of the Patroit Act. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12882226</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:55:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Now only if we had another PhD candidate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12830600</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/862905"><b>Done_Posting</b></A> : What a fascinating article. I'll have have to keep my eyes peeled for more info. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12830600</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:13:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Now only if we had another PhD candidate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12830595</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>This should be easy to block.  Just run a little daemon that randomly adjusts your system time (backwards and forwards) by a few milliseconds every so often.<br> </DIV>Or turn off timestamps with DrTcp as shown in this post:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,12830587~mode=flat">Block timestamps using BBR's DrTCP stops method</A><br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/4zmr3"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://spaces.msn.com/members/tkjunkmail/"><B>My Blog</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12830595</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:13:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Now only if we had another PhD candidate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12830578</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : This should be easy to block.  Just run a little daemon that randomly adjusts your system time (backwards and forwards) by a few milliseconds every so often.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12830578</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:10:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Now only if we had another PhD candidate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12830539</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1114904"><b>oliphant</b></A> : would could write a paper on how to block it ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12830539</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:04:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
