<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Duh in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12850107</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:27:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:27:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Duh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12867169</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627398"><b>quanta</b></A> : The Good, Bad, Ugly ratings are based on many factors, including reliability and customer service. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12867169</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:56:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Duh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12865415</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/730983"><b>linicx</b></A> : Speed was never an issue. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12865415</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 01:27:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>One experience?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12858793</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627398"><b>quanta</b></A> : According to DSLReports's weekly ratings, Bell Canada's Sympatico High Speed is the #2 telco DSL provider in North America.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/gbu">/gbu</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12858793</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:24:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Duh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12852097</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/730983"><b>linicx</b></A> : Unless I miss my guess they are all cut from the same cloth. My one experience with Bell in Canada wasn't any nicer than my many experiences with the baby Bells.                                                                    ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12852097</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:44:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Duh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12850675</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/763650"><b>Doci</b></A> : You're confused. Read the topic and text, Bell Canada has nothin to do with your baby bells.<br><SMALL>--<br>An ISO 14000 registered service provider.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12850675</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:27:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Duh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12850107</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/730983"><b>linicx</b></A> : Been there done that ten years ago. <br><br>Bell doesn't want competition in any area they service -- even if they don't offer broadband. I have no sympathies for any Bell after I witnessed the way they treat local competition. Small mom & pop ISPs wait up to 9 months after a line upgrade is ordered for it to get installed. Bell upgrades their systems state wide in a matter of hours - and they don't want months to do it once they make a decision.  <br><br>Historically, when it comes to internet service providers and connections, there is a huge difference between the bitch and the pup. .  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12850107</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:59:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
