http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r128050 en Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:08:02 EDT Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:08:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,128735 ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,128735 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:04:20 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,128258 djrobx : I do agree that these articles largely missed the boat on DSL installation hassles. Unless I missed something, there was only a very small reference to distance limitations.

Based on my experiences with both technologies, I'm definitely a Cable fan. But I don't think DSL will fail, either. DSL vs. Cable is not like a VHS vs. Betamax, there's no reason why they can't both thrive in the same marketplace. And it looks like, for whatever reasons, the sales are fairly evenly divided between the two. That's a good thing, as long as both can be reasonably successful it only means more options for consumers.

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,128258 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:36:00 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,128050 willardk : and tried to get DSL they would have burned the article and flushed the ashes down the toilet. DSL will fail...
why? because I think the Bell's will kill it either intentionally or unintentionally. It ain't a money maker for the Bells and never will be because its forcing them to clean and repair lines they never had to before the advent of DSL ....all the bad conditions of the lines are coming out of the woodwork now....

Already droves of disatisfied/rejected users are waiting, seeking and getting Cable.



Will


[text was edited by author 2000-10-10 15:37:03]
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,128050 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:25:40 EDT