<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Homograph phishers diversifying? in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12638809</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:01:36 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:01:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Homograph phishers diversifying?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12643441</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/151802"><b>jaykaykay</b></A> : I have seen a number of those of late and marvel at the creativity being used.  Correct spelling is given a whole new meaning!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12643441</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:11:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Homograph phishers diversifying?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12638809</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887018"><b>Vvian Kalyss</b></A> : Check out the new spam that just plopped into my inbox (got past Hotmail's defaults, had to mark it as Junk and move it there).<br><br> <IMG SRC="http://xs15.xs.to/pics/05065/dem_email.JPG"> <br><br>No coincidence, after what we've just seen on the browser front, eh?<br><br>Edit: Yes I know they've been mangling subject lines since forever, but aside from the exotic alphabet, the spelling isn't a problem in this one.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12638809</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:51:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
