<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: His Choice in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12608690</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:56:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:56:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12619960</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Not really. I know plenty of people who got hit by worms like blaster who were using dial up. It may offer a slight security advantage over having a computer directly connected to the Internet over broadband, but it is by no means safer than being behind a router.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12619960</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 22:47:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12614028</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Here's my take (which I submitted to the form on that website with the report but I'm not sure it will get published). Once I got hooked on ADSL I never looked back at 56k. One of the biggest problems of Dial-up internet in my locality is a Busy phone line, which happens too often, especially during peak hours, and moreso with the popularity of pre-paid dial-up internet cards, thus dial-up servers these days bite off more than they can chew. What good is a "cheap" connection if you can't get through most of the time? And what's more, I often had to resort to staying up at the ungodly off-peak hours (like 3 in the morning!) to use the internet more effectively with dial-up. And given how sophisticated webpages are now with graphics and flash animation and stuff, loading a webpage alone can take eons these days on dial-up, which also means lots of minutes of connection time, which increases the charges (in fact I found that I often ended up with much higher bills with metered 56k than I have now with flat-rate ADSL because of necessary connection time). No thanks, my "need for speed" has to be satisfied and I won't settle for anything slower than 384kbps. Oh and another thing, 56k dial-up just won't do for the 3 Networked PC's in my house that share our internet connection.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12614028</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:39:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12613682</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1031267"><b>Titus Pullo</b></A> : Did anyone read the article? Unless I need a college refund pronto, it's an essay on what some people do with their time once they have BB, not a debate on one access method versus another.  <br><br>IMO, the author makes a valid point: There will always be people that spend most of their spare time on line even with a dial-up connection; the point -- I think, anyway -- is that once you obtain 'the need for speed' that BB provides, the possibility of worsening an Internet addiction, whether latent or full-blown, is certainly more likely.  Sure, you can be a boozer w/dialup; what are you with T2 speeds and more?<br><br>An Internet addictive personality + BB, to some folks, would be akin to capturing a bear only to find themselves in the cage with it -- at least I believe that's what the article was driving at.<br><SMALL>--<br> "The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppose." -- Frederick Douglass</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12613682</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:56:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Mine is not by choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12613068</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1144912"><b>MM331</b></A> : I am with Lightning bolt DSL here and My uploads are slower than Dialup at a whopping 0002 UP. Downloads are ok at 2k (+/-) 10% on 3k/384 line. I do have the use of the phone while online.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12613068</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 09:20:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12609811</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/777093"><b>Dustyn</b></A> :  <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by lyls:</SMALL><br><br>uhm no that wasnt why :P didnt seem like that at all anyway... you dont think you can get worms and spyware on 56k? =)<br> </DIV>Of course you can...<br>I'm talking more about hackers.<br>There is LESS chance of being probed on an unsecured dial-up connection than there is on a secured DSL/Cable connection. Why? Because Dial-Up is in a completely different range than that of DSL/Cable. Hackers won't waste time trying to bring down a dial-up connection that doesn't stay connected for long.<br><SMALL>--<br><B>"You have no idea what I am capable of. People who have tried to cross me, have lived to regret it...</B> ~<A HREF="http://www.michellestafford.com/images/ms_burg_1.jpg">Michelle Stafford</A> (Phyllis)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12609811</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:32:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12609228</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/769628"><b>aztecnology</b></A> : I was actually thinking 9600 at the time... doing too many things at once...:D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12609228</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:35:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12608690</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : uhm no that wasnt why :P didnt seem like that at all anyway... you dont think you can get worms and spyware on 56k? =)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12608690</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:35:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12608495</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/777093"><b>Dustyn</b></A> : I can understand how he feels. He just wants to use the internet without worrying about how much time he has to invest in learning about the dangers and threats. Dial-up provides a little better security from hackers.<br>Not everyone wants to spend every waking moment online seeing if they are up to date on the security front, antivirus, anti-spyware....ect...ect. It can all get too tiresome. :huh:<br><SMALL>--<br><B>"You have no idea what I am capable of. People who have tried to cross me, have lived to regret it...</B> ~<A HREF="http://www.michellestafford.com/images/ms_burg_1.jpg">Michelle Stafford</A> (Phyllis)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12608495</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:18:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12607768</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/352846"><b>antdude</b></A> :  <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  aztecnology <A HREF="/useremail/u/769628"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Send him back to 2800 baud...</DIV>2800? Did you mean 2400? :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12607768</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:04:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12607683</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/769628"><b>aztecnology</b></A> : Send him back to 2800 baud...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12607683</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:53:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12607663</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085749"><b>NOCMan</b></A> : I think a page load from CNN is now nearly a meg.. god help you if you like the news on dialup.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12607663</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:50:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>His Choice</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12607496</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/734696"><b>rbright</b></A> : However, I see plenty of reasons to stick with my broadband connection.  If he was unable to see the benefits, there wouldn't be much use in trying to explain them to him.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12607496</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:27:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
