<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12474761</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:43:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:43:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12480900</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/633982"><b>alien9999999</b></A> : you can easily, with Mandrake 10.1 Official]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12480900</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:33:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12480689</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/328901"><b>Snickerdo</b></A> :  <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  salahx <A HREF="/useremail/u/528303"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Back when Windows 95 was introduced, and there was a lot of 16-bit Windows 3.1 code. In order to allow the 16-bit to call 32-bit code (and vice-versa), Windows used a technique called "thunking". This was part fo a facility knowns as WOW (Windows on Windows). So the 32/64-bit issues will probably be dealt with the same way.</DIV>That's exactly how 32/64-bit will be dealt with in Win64.  While there is a penalty from the thunking, it is extremely low, something like less than 1% in most situations.  Still, my A64 3200+ flies with 32-bit XP, I can't wait to try the RTM of XP64 with some real driver support.  As it stands now, I can't boot off RAID with RC1.<br><SMALL>--<br>Bigot - Someone that has won an argument with a Liberal.<BR><B><A HREF="/forum/canchat/">Yes, I CanChat. Can You?</A>     <A HREF="http://www.fiberal.ca">www.fiberal.ca</A></B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12480689</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:28:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12480223</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/732844"><b>click_310</b></A> :  <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>What version of Windows do you run? I haven't seen a BSOD in about 7 years.<br> </DIV> All the BSOD's that I have seen on XP in the last seven years were due to bad hardware. Bad memory, geriatric HDD. Can't blame Uncle Bill for that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12480223</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:12:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12476462</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1035911"><b>the niTz</b></A> : yea really bsod stopped after we moved away from 98 and me:D 2k and xp are the way to go and 2k3]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12476462</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:39:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12476420</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> :  <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by wat about:</SMALL><BR><BR>Gezzzz... I'd be happy if it the 32 bit worked correctly.. no BSOD's, no ugly messages, but what are my chances?  <br> </DIV>What version of Windows do you run? I haven't seen a BSOD in about 7 years.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12476420</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:35:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12476361</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Gezzzz... I'd be happy if it the 32 bit worked correctly.. no BSOD's, no ugly messages, but what are my chances?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12476361</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:31:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12475974</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><b>BosstonesOwn</b></A> :  <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Nerdtalker <A HREF="/useremail/u/772729"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br> <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Persona <A HREF="/useremail/u/1036835"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>And I'll wait for some apps that support 64 bit processing<br> </DIV>Same.<br><br>I'll switch when intel releases their new 64 bit cores.<br> </DIV>A lot of the higher end apps already are supporting the 64 bit arch. Just they are a real b*tch to find a place to get them.<br><br>I run xp-64 no issues at all with all my software. Biggest issue i have is the dep on the processor  I forgot to turn it off for an app that i spent 2 weeks trying to patch.<br><SMALL>--<br> "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12475974</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:54:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474914</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/772729"><b>Nerdtalker</b></A> :  <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Persona <A HREF="/useremail/u/1036835"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>And I'll wait for some apps that support 64 bit processing<br> </DIV>Same.<br><br>I'll switch when intel releases their new 64 bit cores.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474914</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:03:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474761</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/528303"><b>salahx</b></A> : Back when Windows 95 was introduced, and there was a lot of 16-bit Windows 3.1 code. In order to allow the 16-bit to call 32-bit code (and vice-versa), Windows used a technique called "thunking". This was part fo a facility knowns as WOW (Windows on Windows). So the 32/64-bit issues will probably be dealt with the same way. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474761</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:44:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474759</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/397468"><b>BA</b></A> : Using 32-bit apps isn't as transparent as they advertise -  which is why the latest reviews on x64 Windows RC1 indicates there are small number of compatibility problems with existing apps. 32- and 64-bit code can't be used interchangeably. 32-bit apps need 32-bit DLL's and vice versa. For 32-bit apps, the OS uses the WoW64 compatibility mode which results in a (very?) small performance penalty.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474759</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:43:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon laptop</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474644</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/633982"><b>alien9999999</b></A> : Mandrake 64bit, and Gentoo 64bit run great on Athlon64 CPU, for over a year now...<br><SMALL>--<br>Alien is my name and headbiting is my game.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474644</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:29:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474635</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/633982"><b>alien9999999</b></A> : already existed since about 3 months now...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474635</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:28:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474626</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1142851"><b>LinuxJunkie</b></A> : Why does it have to be emulated? AMD64 and EM64T (Intel's version of AMD64 extensions) both support 32-bit code natively. Also, Microsoft has developed the 64-bit version of Windows so it will also run 32-bit software (without emulation, to my understanding). MS removed all legacy 16-bit support but who cares?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474626</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:27:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><b>sbrook</b></A> : If you've the Compaq R3000 series laptop, then you may have problems with drivers.  Someone I know tried to put on Win64 Beta and some of the component manufacturers weren't sure they were going to even bother with 64 bit drivers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474534</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:17:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474527</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627528"><b>innoman</b></A> : 3DMark is a 32bit program isnt it?  If you run a 32bit program in a 64bit environment, it is going to be crap because a 32bit environment has to be emulated.  That whole WOW Windows on Windows thing.  Emulators take up a lot of resources and are generally pretty slow...<br><SMALL>--<br>Formerly Innobabe79</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474527</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:16:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474238</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/344321"><b>bmn</b></A> :  <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>64-bit viruses to follow.<br> </DIV>Its not that hard to do....   A simple recompile should be all it takes in most instances.  <br><SMALL>--<br>Facts...  USE THEM!<BR>Viva <A HREF="http://www.feeverte.net">La Fee' Verte</A>!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474238</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:44:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon laptop</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474018</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1036835"><b>Persona</b></A> : And I'll wait for some apps that support 64 bit processing]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474018</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:17:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon laptop</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474005</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/801002"><b>Plldwnyrpnts</b></A> : I installed the beta on my a64 workstation and it appears to run well.  I haven't had a chance to test it much since ther isn't a whole lot of support for it just yet (driverwise anyway).  ATI does have drivers for it but when I ran 3DMark it looked like complete garbage.  It may be a while before it reaches a mature state.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12474005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:15:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon lapt</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12473997</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : 64-bit viruses to follow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12473997</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:15:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Good; I&#x27;d like to try on my 64 bit Athlon laptop</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12473922</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : When it is out and I've had a chance to look at reviews on the system, I'd like to give it a try on my 64 bit Athlon laptop.<br><br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/4zmr3"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://spaces.msn.com/members/tkjunkmail/"><B>My Blog</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12473922</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:07:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
