<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>More like... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12260936</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:28:27 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:28:27 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>More like...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12260936</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/838846"><b>veloslave</b></A> : The ninth circut court of personal agenda]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12260936</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:19:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hasn&#x27;t the ninth circuit...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12259881</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/793283"><b>calvoiper</b></A> : Yes, but the Ninth Circuit leads in "summary reversals", where the Supremes just hand a case back without full treatment--sort of saying "Wrong, dummies, look at this again"--essentially where the error is so obvious it need not be explained.<br><br>calvoiper<br><SMALL>--<br>VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12259881</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:01:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hasn&#x27;t the ninth circuit...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12259434</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1114904"><b>oliphant</b></A> : People talk about how they're the most overturned court, but if you take it as a percentage of cases, they're not the most overturned.  They're simply overturned often because they handle more cases that the other districts.  Not saying they're not insane kooks on that bench, but they're no more insane than any of the others.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12259434</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:57:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hasn&#x27;t the ninth circuit...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12259356</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/656421"><b>AbBaZaBbA</b></A> : recently? haven't they been full of liberal activist judges for along time?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12259356</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:50:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hasn&#x27;t the ninth circuit...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12259274</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/535085"><b>Bill</b></A> : lost all credibility recently?  Whenever you need some liberal activist judge to rule in your favor, that's where you go.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.secure-wifi.net">Secure-Wifi.Net</A> is now open for buisness in the LA/OC area.<BR></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12259274</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:41:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
