Stupid BASTARDS in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12012292 en Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:03:50 EDT Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:03:50 EDT Re: Stupid BASTARDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12015720 JPCass :
said by lyls:

you do realize youre actually HELPING spammers by turning to vigilantism?
I can understand a point about taking the high road, and tend to agree philosophically. But given that nothing, including waiting patiently for the legal system to work, appears to have really hurt spammers, explain how exactly this really does help spammers in reality and not in theory?

I think spammers may well be scared by this new approach, and that variations that avoid the characteristics of a DDOS attack may be the wave of the future. For instance, I'd like to see a widespread trial of user tools that generated a (anonymized) single hit to the URLs in spam e-mail, since I don't think that the merchants who are sponsoring spam can afford or handle traffic proportionate to that with which they burden the recipients of their advertising.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12015720 Fri, 03 Dec 2004 01:24:13 EDT Re: Stupid BASTARDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12012570 rayondw :
said by lyls:

you do realize youre actually HELPING spammers by turning to vigilantism?
How so?
--
Live in Detroit?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12012570 Thu, 02 Dec 2004 19:19:53 EDT Re: Stupid BASTARDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12012341 anon : you do realize youre actually HELPING spammers by turning to vigilantism?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12012341 Thu, 02 Dec 2004 18:53:55 EDT Stupid BASTARDS http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12012292 Jameson : haha i feel no sorrow for participating in that im glad that it knocked thoes bastards off the www.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12012292 Thu, 02 Dec 2004 18:47:51 EDT