<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>MythTV, the sweetest peach in this pie in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11476534</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:18:55 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:18:55 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>MythTV, the sweetest peach in this pie</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11476534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856606"><b>bmbarnes</b></A> : As a user of MythTV (and infrequent <A HREF="http://home.comcast.net/~bmbarnes0111">blogger</A> of my experience), I am thrilled to see someone scale-up a home video network with enough cards and bandwidth to distribute video to an entire neighborhood.  Now, whether or not this is legal I do not know: I rely on the <I>Betamax</I> decision to justify the time shifting of programs.  I claim that in the US that <I>Betamax</I> applies to my single PVR machine used by one household (in network with only my own computers, WEP-encrypted in my domicile).  I doubt that the law would protect me if I start distributing my signal for money in the apartment building. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11476534</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:37:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
