<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Monopoly in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11466395</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:17:36 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:17:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Monopoly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11469220</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1045111"><b>Carl</b></A> : At the bottom of the page it says it needs a specific <br>provider. look: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.linksys.com/voice/default.asp" >www.linksys.com/voice/default.asp</A><br><br>at the bottom, u see this: <br><br>"* A Voice over IP Service Package from a specific provider is required, and sold separately."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11469220</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:40:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Monopoly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11468503</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><b>BosstonesOwn</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  DaSneaky1D <A HREF="/useremail/u/356509"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Look at the following link:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.linksys.com/voice/default.asp" >www.linksys.com/voice/default.asp</A><br><br>Tell me where it boldly shows these products work with SIPphone...or that they only work exclusively with Vonage.<br><br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Why does it have to work with all services? Why?<br><br>It's a product made and people have the choice to buy a different one if they want.<br><SMALL>--<br> "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11468503</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:24:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Monopoly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466602</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/793283"><b>calvoiper</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Corvus <A HREF="/useremail/u/904806"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> It's a partnership between Linksys and Vonage, to be considered as monopoly, Linksys has to offer their own VoIP service.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Flat out wrong as a general statement.  Antitrust law covers a "conspiracy in restraint of trade", which includes two firms acting in concert as well as anticompetitive acts by a single firm.<br><br>(However, indications are that this SIPphone/Linksys/Vonage lawsuit seems to be based more on deceptive advertising claims than traditional antitrust/monopoly--so both Corvus's statement and my response to it may not relate directly to the case at hand.)<br><br>Calvoiper<br><SMALL>--<br>VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466602</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:17:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Monopoly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466581</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/904806"><b>Corvus</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  DaSneaky1D <A HREF="/useremail/u/356509"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Look at the following link:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.linksys.com/voice/default.asp" >www.linksys.com/voice/default.asp</A><br><br>Tell me where it boldly shows these products work with SIPphone...or that they only work exclusively with Vonage.<br><br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Well, it's not clear that Vonage is the only one, but it clearly shows it doesn't work with all VoIP provider.<br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR> <br>* A Voice over IP Service Package from a specific provider is required, and sold separately.<br><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><SMALL>--<br>Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466581</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:15:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Monopoly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466537</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/356509"><b>DaSneaky1D</b></A> : Look at the following link:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.linksys.com/voice/default.asp" >www.linksys.com/voice/default.asp</A><br><br>Tell me where it boldly shows these products work with SIPphone...or that they only work exclusively with Vonage.<br><br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.djesigns.com">] :: my trivial ramblings :: [</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466537</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:09:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Monopoly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466395</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/904806"><b>Corvus</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  technick <A HREF="/useremail/u/264881"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>If you look at the judgements waged against microsoft for being anti-competitive and for monopoly practices, I think they might have a small wood leg to stand on. <br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>It's a partnership between Linksys and Vonage, to be considered as monopoly, Linksys has to offer their own VoIP service.<br><SMALL>--<br>Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466395</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:46:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Monopoly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466331</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/264881"><b>technick</b></A> : If you look at the judgements waged against microsoft for being anti-competitive and for monopoly practices, I think they might have a small wood leg to stand on. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11466331</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:37:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
