<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Yawn - wake me up when they actually deploy it in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11440963</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:41:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:41:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: yawnnnnn- whatever</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11443820</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/970490"><b>LaserjetXX</b></A> : I agree. I'm tired of hearing about all these technologies that have no impact even on a somewhat distant future.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11443820</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:20:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yawn - wake me up when they actually deploy it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11443660</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/450886"><b>Googled</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Estragon <A HREF="/useremail/u/829559"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>What we need is LDDSL!  That's <B>L</B>ong <B>D</B>istance <B>DSL</B>.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>No don't call it long distance.  The phone companies will want to charge you by the minute if you use that term. ;)<br><br>I agree it seems that the biggest hurdle remaining for DSL is to increase the usable distance.  I've read of repeater type solutions to increase distance.  Why won't phone companies take that step to increase availability?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11443660</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:03:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Yawn - wake me up when they actually deploy it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11440963</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/829559"><b>Estragon</b></A> : This is just yet more promises that will <B> never </B> be fulfilled. :(<br><br>I got excited about DSL when I first heard of it (a many years ago!).  Didn't do <B> me </B> any good.  Until we can get Verizon to deploy DSL in RT's, it's a pretty useless technology in my town.<br><br>What we need is LDDSL!  That's <B>L</B>ong <B>D</B>istance <B>DSL</B>.<br><br>Or for the FCC to <B><I>force</I></B> Verizon to let COVAD deploy equipment in the RT's.  Then we might actually get rural broadband.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11440963</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:52:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: yawnnnnn- whatever</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11440491</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1028188"><b>Pictor Guy</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  P Ness <A HREF="/useremail/u/463293"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>when?? was this not promised in 1996? <br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>heh... I'm still waiting for SDSL or plain ol' ADSL. Living in the fastest growing county in the US in the Washington DC 'burbs and I'm still behind an RT with no DSL support. Fiber is just a pipe dream unless I move a few blocks down the road where OpenBand offers FTTP. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11440491</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:57:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>yawnnnnn- whatever</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11440238</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/463293"><b>P Ness</b></A> : when?? was this not promised in 1996? i know a few years ago SNET local phone company was doing tv.<br><br>Ding first post  :P]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11440238</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:28:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
