<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Why use UDP-based ? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11346121</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:18:04 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:18:04 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why use UDP-based ?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11346121</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/262888"><b>Yowzaaah</b></A> : UDP is significantly less chatty than TCP in that it doesn't send confirmation packets back to the downloader. <br><SMALL>--<br>Don't suspect your friends...Report Them.    Brazil (if you haven't seen it, you should)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11346121</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:11:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why use UDP-based ?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11346063</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Why Use UDP-based ?<br><br>Someone plz. explain. Is it difficult to spot? Any security related concerns?<br><br>Thx.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11346063</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:02:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
