<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: has anyone bought &#x26; received standalone? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11211482</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:48:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:48:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: has anyone bought &#x26; received standalone?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11219405</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Just got off the phone with verizon.... The sales rep told me the wrong thing. 1.5 down and 368 up was what I bought despite me telling her flat out that I wouldn't keep the service if the upload wasn't 768. So, I upgraded to the 3.0. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11219405</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:18:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: has anyone bought &#x26; received standalone?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11218942</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Interesting, here I am searching around for possible details on stacking a cable connection and a new verizon dsl connection to juice up my network and I stumble on to this. 3mbps with a 768 upload speed. Well, I just bought a $34.95 plan that is 1.5 x 768 . Can't wait to see what my speed really is. I have a feeling the upload speed won't surpasse 368.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11218942</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:31:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: has anyone bought &#x26; received standalone?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11211734</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856950"><b>jap</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by toby678:</SMALL><HR>Verizon will not be offering stand alone dsl!  They changed their minds regarding this. Repeat: Verizon will not be offering "naked" dsl!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>You have got to be joking.  If true, I will be seriously pissed off.  Do you have a link to any VZ admission of the reversal?  You don't say how you heard or know of the change.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11211734</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:16:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: has anyone bought &#x26; received standalone?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11211482</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Verizon will not be offering stand alone dsl!<br>They changed their minds regarding this.<br>Repeat<br>Verizon will not be offering "naked" dsl! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11211482</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:47:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>has anyone bought &#x26; received standalone?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11208552</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856950"><b>jap</b></A> : .... including no verizon wireless: utterly standalone?<br><br>And who won the bet?  :b]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11208552</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:00:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
