<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: $25, $40, $55 in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11011212</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:01:19 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:01:19 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: $25, $40, $55</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11015831</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/182519"><b>rradina</b></A> : No.  I recognize when a company is trying to hide the insane profits by adding more of the same instead of just lowering the price.  Didn't Microsoft corner the market on this strategy?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11015831</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:33:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: $25, $40, $55</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11011212</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : I know.  Right now they're using it as a "catch" tier, offered to users who think they're paying too much and are threatening to cancel service....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11011212</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:54:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: $25, $40, $55</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11011201</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1013306"><b>SquareSlinky</b></A> : TWC has a light teir in many areas, they just don't tell anybody about it. <br><br>I love the guys that come into these forums and tell everybody that X speed is all that anybody needs. Well some people have different needs, you might like a skateboard to get to work and I prefer a car. <br><br>Those packages are a pretty good price (with the exception of the light one). Hopefully RR will follow, but it doesn't look like it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11011201</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:53:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: $25, $40, $55</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11010988</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR> Do they fear that making the $25 too good won't get $40/month out of subscribers?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>That's exactly what they fear, and I think it's a big reason many companies like TWC haven't rolled out "lite" tiers yet....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11010988</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:22:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>$25, $40, $55</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11010981</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/182519"><b>rradina</b></A> : Look at the speeds you get for these three prices:<br><br>$25 256/256<br>$40 4M/512<br>$55 5M/768<br><br>What's the deal with the $25 tier?  Isn't it about time that this tier gets respectable download speeds?  Do they fear that making the $25 too good won't get $40/month out of subscribers?  Odds are that they are right.  5M is great but if they offered 1Mbps for $25/month, it's more than most need.  Perhaps they can glue some fins or exhaust headers onto the cable modem to make it look faster...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11010981</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:20:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
