Re: The Original Juice Scam in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11004524 en Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:24:44 EDT Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:24:44 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11007184 pnh102 : Juice Scam? I thought that was the nickname for O.J. Simpson's criminal trial! :mad:

Hat and bloody-gloves ISP provider
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11007184 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 20:55:43 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11005588 joebear29 : I also am in the habit of googling the name of something followed by scam when checking something out. I'm sure others do as well. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11005588 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:50:03 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004838 Karl Bode : Actually, I would type "scam" and "Juice" if I was interested in seeing if Juice was a scam, but I see your point and will add boost to the subtitle....]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004838 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:26:26 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004620 B :
said by Karl Bode See Profile:
Just "juice" and "scam" should be enough.

»www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=U···ice+scam


Actually, Karl, you're proving my point. First, nobody who's checking it out will immediately think to use the search term "scam" -- rather they'll just type the product name.

Further, Google lists your older article highly for »www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&···G=Search precisely because you usd "boost" in the text. Note how DSLR does NOT show up on the first page of Google hits fr "juice boostED" at »www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&···G=Search

So my humble suggestion (to incorporate at least "boost" in the text) still stands.

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004620 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:03:44 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004550 Doctor Four : And the third link in Google points back to BBR's original
article on the juiceboosted scam. But less net savvy
surfers are probably going to buy this one thinking its
for real.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004550 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:49:14 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004524 Karl Bode : Just "juice" and "scam" should be enough.

»www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=U···ice+scam]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004524 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:45:02 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004400 B :
Yes, fine, I see the point now, but if that's the goal shouldn't you include the dreaded name "JuiceBoosted" or "JuiceBoosted.com" somewhere in the body of the article, rather than merely in a link?

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004400 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:31:04 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004250 Karl Bode :
quote:
Many people use search engines and posts like these will help them find info on frauds like this.


My thoughts exactly.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004250 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:57:21 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004240 B :
Fair enough, sir!

-- B]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004240 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:56:05 EDT Re: The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004230 DaSneaky1D : No, not unwarranted. Many people use search engines and posts like these will help them find info on frauds like this.
--
] :: my trivial ramblings :: []]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004230 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:55:03 EDT The Original Juice Scam http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004200 B :
Sorry, couldn't help it. After all, paying this much attention to the new scammers is probably unwarranted at this time?

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11004200 Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:52:55 EDT