<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Repeat with me: The Problem Is Not The Spammer in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10952116</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:41:01 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:41:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Repeat with me: The Problem Is Not The Spammer</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10964362</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/687799"><b>rengaw03</b></A> : <br>No, but it isn't as good as Google's system, and appears to be easier to game -- just try searching for the Hilton Hotel in Paris.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10964362</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:05:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Repeat with me: The Problem Is Not The Spammer</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10958021</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/833221"><b>devrandom</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Steve <A HREF="/useremail/u/340145"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Why don't you put terms of service on your comments that allow you to charge spammers $500 for each on? :-)<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>I think  nil <A HREF="/useremail/u/251107"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> tracking them down would be deterrent enough..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10958021</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 03:40:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Repeat with me: The Problem Is Not The Spammer</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10954981</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/772729"><b>Nerdtalker</b></A> : Sounds like Google Bombing for profit...<br><br>Great... :hmm:<br><br>This could spell the end of Google, and the need for another search algorithm. Anybody know how microsoft's contender search engine works?<br><SMALL>--<br>Touch a thistle timidly, and it pricks you; grasp it boldly, and its spines crumble. -William S. Halsey</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10954981</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 19:57:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Repeat with me: The Problem Is Not The Spammer</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10952374</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/340145"><b>Steve</b></A> : Why don't you put terms of service on your comments that allow you to charge spammers $500 for each on? :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10952374</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 14:25:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Repeat with me: The Problem Is Not The Spammer</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10952116</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/251107"><b>nil</b></A> : This has nothing to do with that.. unlike email spam, this is not targeted to sell a product, the purpose is increasing google ranking. <br><SMALL>--<br>Life is too short to be <A HREF="http://www.unix-girl.com/blog/">boring</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10952116</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 13:48:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Repeat with me: The Problem Is Not The Spammers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10952012</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/834693"><b>LordMalak</b></A> : It is the people who buy products from spammers that are to blame. I'm not talking about the l33t BBR readers, but l33t BBR readers' grandfathers who buy Viagra from spammers at $1 a bottle, or fall for make $$$ quick schemes. <br><br>If there's demmand for spam products, guess what, there will be spammers.<br><br>Maybe if Congress imposed a 200% "Spam tariff" the problem would be solved.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10952012</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 13:38:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
