<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Should have done it from the start... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10686581</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:18:26 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:18:26 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Should have done it from the start...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10689660</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/814020"><b>stridr69</b></A> : i just downloaded Firefox 0.9.1 yesterday(7/3/04), and have yet to see it hiccup at all. Great beta release, can't wait for 1.0 to come out. Too bad the masses out there don't know what a sweet browser Firefox is-much better then Netscape7 by far. Currently I use Netscape6 to avoid the nefarious problems that IE6 offers. And, no, I don't want to lock down my browser to the point where text is the only option.<br><br>Just my 10 cents worth...<br>:D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10689660</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 20:45:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should have done it from the start...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10689191</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/357996"><b>Pz_</b></A> : You aren't even kidding.  I remember with 9x that if you even opened the network folder...and then left (without doing anything) it asked you to reboot.<br><br>lol]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10689191</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 19:20:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should have done it from the start...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10688156</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/850183"><b>wentlanc</b></A> : What about Win2k, which will be supported until 2005??<br><br>puritan]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10688156</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 16:24:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should have done it from the start...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10687980</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/365922"><b>richk_1957</b></A> : I've checked out a lot of the things available for 2003 Server and for a lot of things you don't need a reboot, just the major changes.<br><br>I remember with 9.x & NT if you even looked at the stupid thing the wrong way, it would ask for a reboot.<br><br>Never tried WinME<br><br>W2K was much better<br><br>And if you do something in XP that requires a reboot, chances 2003 server will require it also. In every one of the MS classes I've taken I've been told that XP-Pro is the workstation version of 2003 server]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10687980</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:46:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should have done it from the start...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10686732</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/462602"><b>CO_Chris</b></A> : I just found out that Firefox 0.9 doesn't allow some sites through the pop-up blocker, even though they are on the allowed list. This is not exactly a fatal flaw, but when you add in the web sites (relatively few) that don't display properly, most people will stick with IE. Why trade a headache for an upset stomach? I don't think Bill needs to worry about his stock price too much.<br><br>you got to be kidding right? I will never go back to IE for the S%$%^T that MS makes . Firefox0.9.1 has been the best yet and all we have to look forward to is it getting better. I tell people every day do dump IE and for the most part  75% do  and by far the Norm Best Buy shopper dont have a clue about how the internet works or what they need. I see it every day <br><br>I see  people ask what's a firewall?<br>Do i really need Antivirus whats that do for me??<br>what is spam is that why i get all the pop ups? and if so how can i stop that? will spam blocker work? <br><br>just the Norm ??? i get every day  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10686732</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 12:04:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should have done it from the start...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10686581</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/826894"><b>JimF</b></A> : I just found out that Firefox 0.9 doesn't allow some sites through the pop-up blocker, even though they are on the allowed list.  This is not exactly a fatal flaw, but when you add in the web sites (relatively few) that don't display properly, most people will stick with IE.  Why trade a headache for an upset stomach?  I don't think Bill needs to worry about his stock price too much.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10686581</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 11:41:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should have done it from the start...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10686580</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  wentlanc <A HREF="/useremail/u/850183"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>They should have locked it down sufficiently from the start.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Microsoft did just that with Windows Server 2003.  You have to explicitly enable each Internet-related service.  The only thing I don't like is that you still need to reboot the OS after doing certain patches.  That kind of downtime is unacceptable in a production environment.  Oh well, serves you right for going with such an OS.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://michaelmoorehatesamerica.com">9/11 was the best thing to happen to Michael Moore</A><BR>Win another one for the Gipper!  <A HREF="http://www.georgewbush.com">Bush/Cheney 2004</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10686580</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 11:41:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Should have done it from the start...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10686472</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/850183"><b>wentlanc</b></A> : They should have locked it down sufficiently from the start. But they got hit anyway. And instead of being proactive, they have been reactive for years. I don't think they will recover from the bad PR. <br><br>puritan]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10686472</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 11:27:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
