http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10552169 en Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:42:46 EDT Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:42:46 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10561481 docutrade : Cat 5 has this handy feature built right in.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10561481 Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:58:09 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10556843 RayW : Actually, if it worked I could see my workplace maybe using it. Cells are banned for security reasons, so if it does kill them, so what?.

And Directional antennas are fine, but what about where the beam is pointed? and the side lobes? Mobile devices can not have a beam antenna, otherwise you can not have a truly mobile device what with fiddling around with the pointing instead of walking and working.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10556843 Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:25:50 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10555921 Nerdtalker : It'll probably impede phone at 2.4Ghz as well...

This is so stupid, nobody is going to use it, it'll do nothing, people will remain insecure.

Sheesh, use a directional antenna and adjust the power output for crying out loud...
--
Touch a thistle timidly, and it pricks you; grasp it boldly, and its spines crumble. -William S. Halsey]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10555921 Sat, 19 Jun 2004 19:55:27 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10552169 RayW : Hope this works better than the latest thing we are working on that came from them.

But it is a good concept, and if it is truly frequency selective that would be good for many places.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10552169 Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:00:46 EDT