<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: faster? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10183738</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:40:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:40:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: faster?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10183738</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/772729"><b>Nerdtalker</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Rhobite <A HREF="/useremail/u/590479"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>AES is an encryption method, WEP is a communications protocol. They aren't directly comparable. But 802.11i will be much more secure than WEP.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>That's good to hear, WEP is laughably insecure.<br><SMALL>--<br>Science-fiction yesterday, fact today, obsolete tomorrow. - Otto O. Binder</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10183738</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 22:53:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: faster?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10182193</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/380126"><b>zoom314</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  kalphearion <A HREF="/useremail/u/896760"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  kaisa <A HREF="/useremail/u/676093"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR><br>Is AES better than WEP?<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>From my understanding, AES was/is widely used for Government security of encryption.  Yes AES will be better than WEP due to the fact it is more powerful.  Unfortunatley, most hardware out there will not be able to handle it, and you will end up spending more money, at leaste for a home user to take advantage of it  <br><br>Maybe on a business stand point, AES will benefit, but as for a home user, WEP will do the trick.<br><br>my 2cents<br><br>Brian<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>AES? What's that? It wasn't mentioned until the 2nd poster brought It up.<br><br>I belive that WPA2 is much better than WEP and AES(Whatever that is), Which is now supported by Windows XP Home & Pro. Go download the update for It If You have not already done so.<br><br>And I don't believe AES is supported by XP.<br><br>WEP do the trick? WEP is weak and has been broken from what TechTV says.<br><SMALL>--<br>Charter Pipeline rules in Hesperia, CA, Verizon (ex-GTE) sucks...</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10182193</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 19:34:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: faster?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10181065</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/331747"><b>jdmurray</b></A> : It'd be more "apples and apples" to compare AES with RC4, the encryption method used by WEP.<br><br>AES succeeds 3DES as the gov'ment's encryption method of choice. A proper implementation of AES is a helluva lot more <I>computationally efficient</I> than 3DES. This means your PDA can now not only support WPA 2.0 but also IPSec.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10181065</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 17:28:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: faster?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10179394</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/590479"><b>Rhobite</b></A> : AES is an encryption method, WEP is a communications protocol. They aren't directly comparable. But 802.11i will be much more secure than WEP.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://jimmysquid.com/">Jimmysquid.com</A> - I take pictures.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10179394</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 13:57:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: faster?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10178847</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/896760"><b>kalphearion</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  kaisa <A HREF="/useremail/u/676093"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR><br>Is AES better than WEP?<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>From my understanding, AES was/is widely used for Government security of encryption.  Yes AES will be better than WEP due to the fact it is more powerful.  Unfortunatley, most hardware out there will not be able to handle it, and you will end up spending more money, at leaste for a home user to take advantage of it  <br><br>Maybe on a business stand point, AES will benefit, but as for a home user, WEP will do the trick.<br><br>my 2cents<br><br>Brian]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10178847</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 12:46:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: faster?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10178839</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/676093"><b>kaisa</b></A> : good times, thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10178839</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 12:45:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: faster?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10178824</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/464721"><b>Morac</b></A> : 802.11i has nothing to do with speeds; it only deals with security.  And yes, it is much better than WEP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10178824</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 12:43:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>faster?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10178777</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/676093"><b>kaisa</b></A> : Is 802.11i supposed to be faster than G?<br><br>Is AES better than WEP?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10178777</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 12:38:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
