<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: tell me about it in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10142492</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:52:24 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:52:24 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: tell me about it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10153850</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/671846"><b>museheart</b></A> : Ever since I did the last Windows update, my computer has been slow and yes, at times restarts itself.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10153850</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2004 20:49:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tell me about it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10145781</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/957735"><b>Goldengamego</b></A> : if your using win 2000 uninstall the patch listed here<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-011.mspx" >www.microsoft.com/technet/securi&middot;&middot;&middot;011.mspx</A><br><br>it has a bunch of issues<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;835732" >support.microsoft.com/default.as&middot;&middot;&middot;s;835732</A><br><br>should be listed under ad/remove as KB835732<br><SMALL>--<br>Because Goldengamegod won't fit:p</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10145781</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2004 00:20:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tell me about it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10144520</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856950"><b>jap</b></A> : Easier for me to download, but whatever works!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10144520</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 22:02:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tell me about it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10144338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/668528"><b>alexlck</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  jap <A HREF="/useremail/u/856950"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Megladon, I echo MrChris' response.  All the MS errors I've seen were for one of two reasons: pre-existing system infection or corruption OR failed installation via windows update - not because the patches themselves were bad.  That's not to say patch compatibility issues don't occur just that the vast majority of patch failures get blamed on the patch when in fact it was delivery method or a flaw in the system it was applied to.  As a second-tier tech who managed 200 public & quasi-public systems I've responded to hundreds of patch failures.<br><br>Mostly the pros DO NOT use windows update: the offline version of the patch is downloaded to the local network and applied from there.  Despite improvements to the windows update site it still is second-rate: unless you are on dial-up it's always better to use the offline packages.  Before you do a rebuild (unless you are due for one anyway) you might wanna download the offlines, un-install the recent patches that destabilized your system, clean the system, then re-apply the patches from the offline source.<br><br>G'luck!<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>order a FREE security fix CD from MS.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10144338</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 21:48:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tell me about it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10143889</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637748"><b>David</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  DaveNJ <A HREF="/useremail/u/107980"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>On saturday and friend had a party and asked if i could look at his machine 870 spyware 44 viruses, no window updates. He called and thanked me again this morning.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Agreed, friend of the  Jamie <A HREF="/useremail/u/780599"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> brought over her machine and I looked at it... I plugged it into the router and that thing went online by itself.... I am like.... Thank you adaware, and spybot.... She said it has been running very well after I got rid of the crap off of it.. <br><SMALL>--<br><B> Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime - Lao Tzu</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10143889</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 21:07:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tell me about it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10142800</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856950"><b>jap</b></A> : Megladon, I echo MrChris' response.  All the MS errors I've seen were for one of two reasons: pre-existing system infection or corruption OR failed installation via windows update - not because the patches themselves were bad.  That's not to say patch compatibility issues don't occur just that the vast majority of patch failures get blamed on the patch when in fact it was delivery method or a flaw in the system it was applied to.  As a second-tier tech who managed 200 public & quasi-public systems I've responded to hundreds of patch failures.<br><br>Mostly the pros DO NOT use windows update: the offline version of the patch is downloaded to the local network and applied from there.  Despite improvements to the windows update site it still is second-rate: unless you are on dial-up it's always better to use the offline packages.  Before you do a rebuild (unless you are due for one anyway) you might wanna download the offlines, un-install the recent patches that destabilized your system, clean the system, then re-apply the patches from the offline source.<br><br>G'luck!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10142800</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 19:26:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tell me about it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10142492</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/697274"><b>mrchris</b></A> : Try running a spyware and virus scans.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10142492</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 18:58:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tell me about it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10142389</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/870332"><b>Megladon13</b></A> : I just did a few windows updates, and now my computer keeps locking up at random times, i'm thinking of reformating my harddrive and doing a fresh install of everything.  Windows updates arnt always that great.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10142389</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 18:43:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tell me about it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10141922</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/107980"><b>DaveNJ</b></A> : On saturday and friend had a party and asked if i could look at his machine 870 spyware 44 viruses, no window updates. He called and thanked me again this morning.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10141922</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 17:48:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
