republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » New Comcast Throttling System = 'A Really Good DSL Experience'
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2008-08-21 10:44:12: As insiders have informed me, by the end of the year, Comcast is considering implementing a clear 250GB cap, increased DMCA enforcement, and will begin throttling high-consumption users back to "above DSL speeds". ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7
AuthorAll Replies


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

Hmm.. they'll throttle me back to

6Mbps ? I could live with that.
The problem that I've noticed (been on Cable for a few days from DSL).
DSL = VERY stable. On a 3Mbps DSL line, I will hit max 99% of the time, and latency will not change
Cable = Faster (6Mbps/512kbps), however, speeds will vary, as will latency.

Skypeout actually ran better on 3Mbps DSL than 6Mbps cable.
--
Canada = Hollywood North


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southwest

 too vague


the potential for regular users to be labeled 'high consumption users' is there and the internet community should be wary. imagine downloading an unbox movie, using your independent voip, and someone in the household surfing/streaming random video clips. would that qualify you as a high consumption user? does throttling back your connection during that one instance occur or does the system identify repeat offenders?

too many questions for me to support this.


wjames

join:2006-11-30
Atlanta, GA
before or after?

Are they throttling before the cap is reached?

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
Looks like yes (just during periods of network congestion). If you go over the cap you pay extra money. Guess I need to watch my backup usage, though 250GB isn't horrible...


baineschile
2600
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI
reply to en102
Re: Hmm.. they'll throttle me back to

Maybe when people stop downloading pirated movies and software at a staggering rate, ISPs wouldnt have to do it for everyone.

Thanks a lot, piraters, for making the experience rough for everyone

cybercrimes

join:2003-12-24
Phoenixville, PA
caps

i can see them loseing customers if the put on caps im with verizon fios with no caps. people with comcast will go elseware for internet with no caps if they can

daslog

join:2002-04-10
Milford, NH

said by cybercrimes See Profile :

i can see them loseing customers if the put on caps im with verizon fios with no caps. people with comcast will go elseware for internet with no caps if they can
Yep. The high cost customers that they lose money on. Win-Win for both Comcast and the Customer.


baineschile
2600
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI
reply to cybercrimes
You would be incorrect. No normal residential person can come up with a 100% legal excuse to use more than 250 gigs/mo


Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
FAP or Cap, why both?

If they're FAPping why the need to cap and vice versa?


aciddrink

join:2000-08-26
Kailua, HI
reply to baineschile
Re: Hmm.. they'll throttle me back to

What about those of us that stream netflix, download linux distros and/or movies from Itunes? We can easily consume as much or more bandwidth than a 'pirate' can, especially in a household.


hopeflicker
Capitalism breeds greed
Premium
join:2003-04-03
Long Beach, CA

reply to baineschile
said by baineschile See Profile :

Maybe when people stop downloading pirated movies and software at a staggering rate, ISPs wouldnt have to do it for everyone.

Thanks a lot, piraters, for making the experience rough for everyone
perhaps cable ISPs need to upgrade their network.
Docsis 1 and 2, pffftt!. LOL
--
Religion does three things quite effectively: Divides people, Controls people, Deludes people.


Titus Pullo
I came, I saw, I slept

join:2004-06-26
·Embarq

reply to en102
That's true (DSL vs cable) in my experience as well. But that may vary by market. I'm always get my cap, and latency is good as well as solid.

On the flip side, posts in the forum for my provider are relatively solid with markets experiencing overloaded areas, etc.

I think it really depends on your area. I've been very lucky so far.

As for Comcast's public relations ... do the words 'White House Press Office' have any meaning for you?
--


Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP


4 edits
reply to baineschile
Re: caps

said by baineschile See Profile :

You would be incorrect. No normal residential person can come up with a 100% legal excuse to use more than 250 gigs/mo
Guess you've never heard of Carbonite or Slingbox. Between DirecTV VOD, VPN, buying games on EA Link and Steam (or more specially redownloading), AppleTV, Netflix and XBOX 360 rentals, and the biggest, Slingbox streams of MLB all Summer I've done over 250GB in a month on quite a few occasions. Thankfully Cox doesn't enforce their 40GB cap and Verizon FiOS apparently has no consumer network management.


baineschile
2600
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI
·Comcast
·magicjack.com
·Verizon Wireless B..

reply to morbo
Re: too vague

Downloading an unbox movie - 3gigs
VOiP 1 hour chat - 30Mb/hr (approx)
Surfing Clips - 250-500Mb an hour (1024x768 max)

So, if you download 2 movies a day (180 gigs/mo), chat on the phone 2 hours a day (about 4 gigs/mo) and surf for video clips 3 hours a day (about 40 gigs/mo), you are still using less than the cap 224gigs.

But cmon, who does all that?


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southwest

from the article, I don't see where it says 'throttling will occur once the 250gb cap has been met' or similar. so i take it as even normal users could be throttled (without hitting the cap) to make sure other users have access. etc. which is different than only throttling when cap has been reached.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 reply to en102
Extensive discussion of this in Comcast forum here at BBR

Some discussion on this here:

»[Speed] Comcast to throttle individual users; all protocols


jmn1207
Premium
join:2000-07-19
Reston, VA
·Verizon FIOS

reply to Dogfather
Re: FAP or Cap, why both?

said by Dogfather See Profile :

If they're FAPping why the need to cap and vice versa?
$$$$ Just looking for a new way to increase revenue.

viperlmw
Premium
join:2005-01-25
·Qwest.net

reply to baineschile
Re: caps

You must not peruse the 'Broadband Heavy' forum on this site. For example, this streams live web cams to your pc/mac in the form of a screensaver: »Windows/OS X Screensaver of Axis cameras around the world

It's not a lot, but seems to add 40-50GB monthly to my bandwidth usage.

Indymike

join:2004-12-06
Indianapolis, IN
·Covad Communications

Throttling - why?

Has anyone seen any kind of "real" information that shows that Comcasts network is overloaded to the point that 'throttling' is required?

I'm starting to wonder if they are either refusing to upgrade their network to support the numbers of users they have added OR they are worried about people getting video from the internet instead of the cable video service....
Forums » New Comcast Throttling System = 'A Really Good DSL Experience'page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7


Sunday, 29-Nov 02:06:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF