Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Why We Have No National Broadband Policy
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2007-04-26 09:16:48: The OECD global broadband rankings released earlier this week showed the United States dropped further when it comes to broadband penetration. ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5
AuthorAll Replies

Drakemoore

join:2005-02-03
Hawthorne, FL

Ummn.. right.

Deployment and adoption of high-speed Internet service in the U.S. is a success story that shouldn’t be portrayed as a failure because of misleading statistics -- Cable’s broadband service is available to at least 94 percent of all U.S. homes, McSlarrow pointed out. At the same time that broadband availability has increased, McSlarrow said, the speed of the service also has jumped while prices have declined."

94 Percent, Yeah right >.>

All raise their hand who thinks that's a load of crap

* Raises Hand*


TScheisskopf
World News Trust

join:2005-02-13
Belvidere, NJ
/me raises hand

Furthermore, since when did Fred Upton have a comedy act?


Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Boston, MA

"Because we can't even agree there's a problem"

Well, at least I agree with something in these multiple articles. Can someone tell me again why we're expecting companies to roll out services and infrastructure to areas that will never even pay off the cost of that infrastructure in our lifetimes?
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?

BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
·Comcast


1 edit
reply to TScheisskopf
Re: Ummn.. right.

Hell the line about the prices going down and speed going up had me laughing more then the episode of seinfeld when kramer takes the school bus and converts it to a tour bus.

Funny fella right there. These folks should start a saturday night live clone tv show.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

 Amazing Cluelessness

Why do people continue to insist that the same government which legalized spam with the CAN-SPAM act, and is about to legalize spyware in the same manner, among other things, is in any way, shape or form able to "manage" our broadband.

If people want a guarantee that the best broadband we will ever get is a half working dialup connection on a good day, once a month, then by all means, pass a national broadband policy.

For some people to continue to insist that the government is the answer to every perceived problem even though we know of the government's track record in this department, is a textbook illustration of insanity.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to Cabal
Re: "Because we can't even agree there's a problem"

said by Cabal See Profile :

Well, at least I agree with something in these multiple articles. Can someone tell me again why we're expecting companies to roll out services and infrastructure to areas that will never even pay off the cost of that infrastructure in our lifetimes?
Those who want this BB policy expect the taxpayers to pay for broadband to every little rural whistle stop and farmhouse, and damn the cost. In other words, become more of a socialist country than we already are.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page


major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

This would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha. A national broadband policy? You gotta be shitting me. The only way the U.S. will see such a beast is if the telcos give the OK to their well paid errand boy at the FCC and the whores in Congre$$ get something extra in their campaign coffers. Otherwise, you can forget about any kind of policy, least of all, one that benefits consumers.

BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
·Comcast

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: "Because we can't even agree there's a problem"

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

said by Cabal See Profile :

Well, at least I agree with something in these multiple articles. Can someone tell me again why we're expecting companies to roll out services and infrastructure to areas that will never even pay off the cost of that infrastructure in our lifetimes?
Those who want this BB policy expect the taxpayers to pay for broadband to every little rural whistle stop and farmhouse, and damn the cost. In other words, become more of a socialist country than we already are.
Mine as well be more socialist.

I mean really we have so many problems not addressed at this point whats one more in the pot.

Why can't we take the usf slush fund and actually use it for something other then letting the companies dip in to make their bottom line look better.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"

garmst

join:2000-09-17
New York, NY
·Speakeasy

BLAH - BLAH!

Virtually the only complaints I hear about BB availability are in this site. I have only heard about two complaints about BB speed or availability in many years. One was when my sister switched from Adelphia to Verizon to save money (she could have switched back if she really wanted to). Another was a friend in New Mexico who was outside the city and she got satellite (while not wonderful she still got access).

We do need more competition, and it certainly seems to be in the pipeline. The market and some reasonable GOV/FCC actions(and some inaction?) will hopefully allow this in the end.


ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA


2 edits
Priorities people

F a BB policy...how about a traffic policy or energy policy. There are so many other issues that impact quality of life far more than someone not being able to get low latency broadband. The gov't needs to quit wasting time an money worrying about BS like this.

For those without BB, tough. Move. Everyone when chosing their place to live has many considerations. For me it was closeness to work, schools, shopping, freeways, crime rate and BROADBAND AVAILABILITY.

Whining about not having low latency broadband (since virtually EVERYONE can get sat BB) is like moving next to the airport THEN bitching about the traffic and noise.

sparks

join:2001-07-08
Little Rock, AR

reply to major marco
Re: This would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic

everything is the old mighty buck.
The cable and bells buy a senator and tell them what to say and what to think.
We are the highest price and lowest speeds in the world.
BUT we are told that we are the best, of course we are, now remember senator (fill in name) the money we gave you was to educate you on the problems of the consumer and to look the other way when we do this or that.
HELL in this country replace cable and bells with ANY company.

its a shame really but the stupid americans just sit and take it...why I am watching the game I don't have time to think...thats what my elected officials do for me.

wentlanc
You Can't Fix Dumb..

join:2003-07-30
Maineville, OH

reply to ColorBASIC
Re: Priorities people

Here's an idea. Put your money where your mouth is. Don't want to hear about problems with broadband, then move your ignorant ass off of a broadband forum, and go to an energy forum instead. Seriously, WTF is in your address bar, and why are you surprised?

Who said anything about low latency? We're talking about penetration, speed, and fair competition. Not the current profit saving stranglehold that is in place today.


major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

reply to garmst
Re: BLAH - BLAH!

said by garmst See Profile :

Virtually the only complaints I hear about BB availability are in this site.
Apparently you must lead a very sheltered life if you haven't bothered to look beyond this site for broadband complaints.
--
The Toll


jytr

join:2005-02-03
Cliffwood, NJ
reply to TKJunkMail
Re: "Because we can't even agree there's a problem"

Socialism for the wealthy and capitalism for the rest of us.

Peace

"America. Home of the free and enslaved" (C) 2007 James T. Romano

johnh123

join:2002-11-19
Chicago, IL

reply to sparks
Re: This would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic

said by sparks See Profile :

We are the highest price and lowest speeds in the world.

Lowest speeds? I don't think so. Check out the stats on speedtest.net


major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

said by johnh123 See Profile :

Lowest speeds? I don't think so. Check out the stats on speedtest.net
Don't be so selectively obtuse. The lowest speed compared to other countries.
--
The Toll



scrummie02
Bentley

join:2004-04-16
Arlington, VA


1 edit
reply to pnh102
Re: Amazing Cluelessness

People that also complain the same government that wants to tap our lines and listen to us should also be the same ones that lay down and manage broadband we well.
--
"I hate conservatives, but I really hate liberals." - Matt Stone
»www.reason.com/


scrummie02
Bentley

join:2004-04-16
Arlington, VA

reply to major marco
Re: BLAH - BLAH!

amazingly the first few hits are about UK or Australian providers or older complaints...thus corroborating what he said.
--
"I hate conservatives, but I really hate liberals." - Matt Stone
»www.reason.com/


marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO

reply to pnh102
Re: Amazing Cluelessness

The problem here is that the market is clearly not able to achieve the goals being set out.
There is no information transparency. There is poor accounting of benefits. There are rapidly developing monopoly situations. The market failures in the broadband market are all over the place.

Hence, this is a situation that calls for government intervention to solve. Right now though, we clearly suffer a rational ignorance failure (as this article demonstrates well), as well as heavy rent seeking and a short time horizon (see how many times complaints appear in this thread about recouping infrastructure costs in rural areas over a long time frame). The government failures are so clear it is almost laughable. We need to have government intervention against the market failures (and only against the market failures), clear legislative rational ignorance through non-governmental research support, push to eliminate rent seeking by regulated entities (all regulated entities), and most importantly extend our broadband deployment cost recovering time frame across multiple lifetimes.

If we do that, the issue will be solved and solved for a fraction of the cost of electric and phone deployment.
--
ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet
telnet://bbs.iscabbs.com
Professional Geographer
Geographic Information Science researcher

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
reply to Cabal
Re: "Because we can't even agree there's a problem"

Bah. We don't need to do anything. Just ask the NCTA. They say only 6% of the country is not wired for cable broadband right now!
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.
Forums » Why We Have No National Broadband Policypage: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5


Monday, 23-Nov 12:32:23 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF