furlonium
Computer Over? Virus equals Very Yes?
join:2002-05-08
Bethlehem, PA | HOI?
How about "Brains For Former Press Secretaries"? BFFPS! |
|
clickie
join:2005-05-22
Monroe, MI | Members of "Handsoff.org"
»handsoff.org/hoti_docs/aboutus/members.shtml
Let every one of them know what you think. |
|
pabster
join:2001-12-09
Waterloo, IA | Of course they don't identify the crook properly...
Why would the liberal mainstream media mention McCurry's connections to the Clinton White House?
This guy is a bought and paid industry shill. |
|
sousademiami
join:2003-02-04
Hialeah, FL | Liberal or Conservative, when you're wrong you're wrong. Just because liberals are wrong less, doesn't mean the media is biased.
--
OASAASLLS |
|
Diceman2037
join:2005-09-24
Australia | wow.. notice how all those companies SUCK. |
|
ftthz
If love can kill hate can also save
join:2005-10-17 | reminds me of spam
... |
|
brooklynman4
join:2004-09-07
Brooklyn, NY | Hey if i has stocks on baby bells i would ssplat my mouth all over lol |
|
batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Nonprofit
quote:
McCurry as "co-chair of Hands Off the Internet, a Washington, D.C.-based coalition of technology, media and nonprofit organizations."
Teletruth could not be in that coalition as Teletruth is a FOR PROFIT lobbing company. |
|
asdfdfdf
@xtraport.net | Karl...
Have you considered contacting some of the papers, like the baltimore sun and trying to get a rebuttal op-ed of your own published? |
|
molsen
join:2002-04-12
Huntington, NY | reply to batterup
Re: Nonprofit
I am sure you have strong views on this... But what exactly are "net neutrality" advocates asking for?
Can you be clearer? I don't get it -- and I do have a dog in the fight, for purposes of full disclosure.
Mike |
|
sousademiami
join:2003-02-04
Hialeah, FL
 ·Comcast
·AT&T Southeast
| Hopeully avoiding the ISP carriers altering our ability to access content online.
Simply put: I already pay the DSL carrier 50 bucks a month to have access to the internet and any content available, and so do the content providers (considerably more, I'm sure).
These companies would like to charge the content providers twice. Once for access, and once to allow me to access thier information.
I don't see how that's fair to me or the content provider.
--
OASAASLLS |
|
richardpor
Fur it up
join:2003-04-19
Portland, OR | So what the news
I do not recall a means test for ones First amendment freedom of speech nor do I call freedom of speech is limited to left wing activists. Enough with the Astroturfing bs. Deal with the message not the messenger. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to clickie
Re: Members of "Handsoff.org"
I will. I think they are doing a great job.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page |
|
tsu9
join:2001-08-17
Wheeling, IL
| Ridiculous
"A $117 billion company like Google wants legislation that would drive Internet prices higher and stifle innovation, all for a non-existent problem."
How incredibly ironic, as that's precisely what lack of neutrality will cause. |
|
lewis128
@glwb.net | garbage
dont they realize how much google has done for the internet? This is all BS if you use the net for email only get dial up. |
|
fferddd
@glwb.net | well
we need neutrality otherwise they will take advantage of us |
|
Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL
| reply to TKJunkMail
Re: Members of "Handsoff.org"
Yeah I seen how the no regulation business is. I am currently in Argentina where there is almost no regulation what so ever. There is Fibre Telecom who offer for 35 dollars per month (Dollars not pesos) 512K speeds.
Regulations exist for a reason but at the same time too much regulation is bad.
When it comes to regulation people only think what will benefit them, consider it like a one way business decision where you only have our way or the highway.
Companies should follow laws, there is a limit to how much profit they can actually take from consumers. Without it we would be paying 150 dollars for a spoon. Not saying that every business will do that but in a world where money talks that's what most likely will happen.
From what I have seen here, I simply will have to disagree with deregulation of the internet. |
|
backness
join:2005-07-08
K2P OW2 | reply to tsu9
Re: Ridiculous
hehe and he says google is not an innovative company... The company that revolutionized the net and they are less innovative then a cable company or a telco...
give me a break! |
|
asdfdfdf
@xtraport.net
| reply to richardpor
Re: So what the news
It is about the deception of hiding corporate lobbying money behind front organizations designed to look like a spontaneously developing grass roots group. If the messenger wasn't important these companies would simply advocate their position without resorting to such deception.
It is perverse to argue that willfully practicing such deception is of no importance. |
|
