republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Cox Anti-Competitive Deals Questioned
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2006-06-27 09:11:50: Arizona State utility regulators are recommending that Cox Communications be fined $2 million for arranging a special deal with a developer that prevented other phone companies from selling services in a Peoria community, reports the Associated Press. ..

AuthorAll Replies

kdandaoc

join:2003-10-13
608052427
Competition.....

Not sticking up for Cox, but the telcos engage in this activity all of the time, whats the diff?

Steaven Seagal/Starr Jones in 2008

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
where?


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

 reply to kdandaoc
said by kdandaoc See Profile :

Not sticking up for Cox, but the telcos engage in this activity all of the time, whats the diff?

Steaven Seagal/Starr Jones in 2008
Cox getting what it deserves, but a few mitigating factors might justify reducing the fine.

1st, the local government of Peoria set up the whole exclusive deal rules that the developer used with Cox.

2nd, Cox paid out $1m to settle with a small phone company.

3rd, Cox wiped the deal out when challenged by the commission.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

just a shady business deal

sounds like nothing more than a greedy developer cutting a deal with a (by definition) greedy cable company.

Unfortunately, they apparently tried to do this somewhere actual competition exists, where CLECs still roam the earth.

In 85% of the country, there wouldn't have been anyone to complain, because homeowners wouldn't have had a choice anyway.


Tsume

join:2004-02-23
Johnson City, TN
·Embarq
·ViaTalk
·Comcast

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: Competition.....

Indeed, 2m is OBSCENE. Esp since the telcos are never punished for this bs.

Why aren't apartment complexes getting sued for signing deals only allowing one cable company there? My friend is stuck with Adelphia and would love COX, but the managers say they're stuck in a contract with Adelphia. Should be ILLEGAL.

And as far as no competition goes, I'd rather have COX and no competition than someone with zero chances of upgrading such as AT&T.
--
"True warriors do not follow paths, they make them. It is not just their desire, it is their nature." (Battletech)

GhostDoggy

join:2005-05-11
Duluth, GA
reply to kdandaoc
And they are also fined all of the time, too. So, what is your point, really?


roamer1
sticking it out at you

join:2001-03-24
Atlanta, GA
clubs:

reply to nasadude
Re: just a shady business deal

said by nasadude See Profile :

Unfortunately, they apparently tried to do this somewhere actual competition exists, where CLECs still roam the earth.
Accipiter isn't a CLEC.

-SC
--
"it seems like all you ever buy is Abercrombie and cell phones" --a friend


Tsume

join:2004-02-23
Johnson City, TN
·Embarq
·ViaTalk
·Comcast

reply to GhostDoggy
Re: Competition.....

Actually... they really aren't.

And say they were..

Well, just add another generic recovery fee at the bill.

They don't pay the fine, the customers do.
--
"True warriors do not follow paths, they make them. It is not just their desire, it is their nature." (Battletech)


roamer1
sticking it out at you

join:2001-03-24
Atlanta, GA
clubs:

reply to Tsume
said by Tsume See Profile :

Why aren't apartment complexes getting sued for signing deals only allowing one cable company there?
Because unlike the developer deals, deals with apartment complexes don't infringe upon the rights of the owners of complexes. They do affect the tenants, of course, but the interests of the owner trump those of the tenants.
My friend is stuck with Adelphia and would love COX, but the managers say they're stuck in a contract with Adelphia. Should be ILLEGAL.
That won't happen even in the absence of an exclusive contract since Adelphia and Cox don't compete. Of course, it could be worse -- even Adelphia is better than the utter crap spewed from leaky micro-headends that some apartment complexes (fewer and fewer these days, thankfully) pass off as "cable".

-SC
--
"it seems like all you ever buy is Abercrombie and cell phones" --a friend


Tsume

join:2004-02-23
Johnson City, TN
·Embarq
·ViaTalk
·Comcast

Actually, in San Diego county many areas can be served by two different (might even be three in a few areas! we've got RR, COX, and Adelphia around here) cable providers.
--
"True warriors do not follow paths, they make them. It is not just their desire, it is their nature." (Battletech)


rec9140
Provoice just DO it

join:2003-07-29
Mulberry, FL

 Should be more!

Should add a few more zeros AFTER that 2 to the tune of lets be generous and start at $200 MILLION. Cash or Bearer Bonds ONLY, please.

Business only understands one thing, $$$$, so make it HURT, REALLY HURT! And they will get the message.
--

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

reply to bogey780
Re: Competition.....

said by bogey780 See Profile :

where?
Qwest is doing the same thing in Arizona as well. They have communities where you can only get their service just like COX.

Always funny when the pot calls the kettle black. Like it was said, phone does it too.


Shrapnel64
Premium
join:2001-01-24
Hayes, VA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Cox HSI

reply to rec9140
Re: Should be more!

Make it really hurt for the company so that the rates can go up another 30% in 2 years. I don't like the way that sounds.

If they are punished for doing something like that, and are charged an astronomical fee (just to be made an example of to other companies), then it's just going to be passed on to the consumer. Where does that make any sense?

cableguy619

join:2003-06-24
Chula Vista, CA
reply to bogey780
Re: Competition.....

here in california....

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
I hadn't seen any triple play lock-outs from Bell. Didn't know they did it anywhere.


roamer1
sticking it out at you

join:2001-03-24
Atlanta, GA
clubs:

reply to Tsume
said by Tsume See Profile :

Actually, in San Diego county many areas can be served by two different (might even be three in a few areas! we've got RR, COX, and Adelphia around here) cable providers.
Major MSOs competing with one another is highly unusual. (That said, I've heard of it happening in very isolated instances -- back before Comcast bought AT&T Broadband, in one part of Atlanta there was something like 25 houses on a street that straddles a county line that could choose from either one.)

-SC
--
"it seems like all you ever buy is Abercrombie and cell phones" --a friend


roamer1
sticking it out at you

join:2001-03-24
Atlanta, GA
clubs:

reply to bogey780
said by bogey780 See Profile :

I hadn't seen any triple play lock-outs from Bell. Didn't know they did it anywhere.
BellSouth hasn't to the best of my knowledge, even in IFITL neighborhoods (not including apartment complexes and other MDU situations, where exclusive contracts are the norm and one company doing both cable and phone isn't at all unusual.) Ditto for both SBC/at&t and Verizon. What Qwest and Cox have done in Arizona is quite unusual, and is largely enabled by peculiarities in regulations and development patterns in that state that are shared by only a few other states (mainly Texas.)

-SC
--
"it seems like all you ever buy is Abercrombie and cell phones" --a friend


Tsume

join:2004-02-23
Johnson City, TN
·Embarq
·ViaTalk
·Comcast

reply to roamer1
There was actually a news story on our local news channel about how some areas of san diego have cable competition, which is rare in the US.
--
"True warriors do not follow paths, they make them. It is not just their desire, it is their nature." (Battletech)
Forums » Cox Anti-Competitive Deals Questioned


Thursday, 26-Nov 10:47:36 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF