republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Supporting Network Neutrality
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2005-11-05 12:46:19: NYCwireless has issued a challenge to every company which provides broadband services in NYC to make a public statement supporting the four Network Neutrality principles. Network Neutrality is the concept that network operators provide free and no.. ..

AuthorAll Replies


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

 5th principle

Consumers are free to take their business to another provider if the provider doesn't run their private business to the consumers liking.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
My Web Page

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Consumers are free to take their business to another provider if the provider doesn't run their private business to the consumers liking.
this presumes one has another provider to turn to. I only have one choice and that's comcast.

Leaving me with no option but to drop broadband or put up with their crippled offering.


packetscan
Premium
join:2004-10-19
Bridgeport, CT
clubs:
reply to TKJunkMail
Amen. When there is another choice.
--
Who do you want to pay off today?

Bass2nv

join:2001-01-19
Wyoming, MI
reply to TKJunkMail
I'd love to actually have someone other than Comcast to go to. But since my other choices are SLOW 144/144 dsl or dialup. I'm pretty much stuck with Comcast.


moby866
Premium
join:2000-10-07
Above you
·surpasshosting
·RoadRunner Cable
·Vonage
·CableOne

Consider yourself blessed that you can even GET DSL. Where I am at I can only get Conca$t, but homes less than 1/2 mile away can get DSL.
--
Health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die, and the world death rate holds at a steady 100.00%


gheezer
Compooters R Us
Premium
join:2002-12-20
Henrietta, NY

reply to nasadude
Not to rain on your parade or anything like that, but a cable modem isn't considered an "End Point" of the Internet. I believe they're referring to the Public Peering Exchange Points.
--
Join the NAVY, see the world....It's mostly water!


ib50MbSoon
Formerly TwoKDialup
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Coloma, MI
Yabbut...

Since these "private" businesses are using "public" resources (terrestrial right-of-way or public airwaves), they should be subject to network neutrality regulations. It's a shame we have to legislate good business practices for some operators.

bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: 5th principle

That only works when you aren't locked into a contract with massive panalty charges... Network providers have ways of keeping your suggesting from work.

Additionally, the 5th principle does not to alleviate the problem of network operators violating network neutrality... If everyone does it, then your proposed principle does solve jack.

BTW, are you in my state today, not but two parishes over, cause if you are, IM me and I'll buy you a beer in NOLA?
--
This space intentionally left blank.


rit56

join:2000-12-01
New York, NY
scorecard

one company isn't very assuring.

bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus
Well, the principles were only posted yesterday if the article date is correct... If there is only one provider on the list in six months then its time to worry.
--
This space intentionally left blank.


G_Poobah

join:2004-01-17
Schenectady, NY

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: 5th principle

Why in the world would there be a rule like #5? That's a pointless rule, since if the ISP follows rules #1-4, then there should be no NEED for idea #5.

The only time rule #5 would apply, is if the provider doesn't follow rules #1-4.

The CORRECT rule #5 : If the provider fails to obey the first rule, then it should be banned from selling internet service, or advertising what they sell as internet access. Because if they don't follow #1-4, then they are NOT an ISP
--
Sure the internet has lots of porn and piracy, but I'm sure there's a downside to it.


justncredible

@rr.com

reply to bmn
Re: scorecard

They are idiots, they sound as if they have not built a decent network and are trying to sap bandwidth from other providers. They are just looking for a free handout. I would be worried if any company supports this, I would not work for them or invest in such a company. Wireless is crap anyways.

bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

said by justncredible :

They are just looking for a free handout.
Oookay... Yeah, that's what network neutrality is all about.
--
This space intentionally left blank.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

reply to moby866
Re: 5th principle

said by moby866 See Profile :

Conca$t
That's almost as cute as M$ ..... not.

WirelessMajr
Premium
join:2005-08-03
College Place, WA

reply to justncredible
Re: scorecard

So what you're saying is that commercial wireless service should not exist? And the laptop owners should all keep crowding hotspots, or using America's largest free wireless provider (linksys)?

I have to disagree with you. Wireless is here to stay, and it is not crap as you so claim.


Unregistered user

reply to justncredible
They're just trying to sap bandwidth from other providers? Wireless is crap? Exactly what are you talking about, and what does it have to do with network neutrality?

Oh, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. Never mind.
Forums » Supporting Network Neutrality


Wednesday, 25-Nov 02:29:39 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF