Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Browse Happy
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2004-08-25 13:46:39: "Browse Happy" is the slogan and URL of a new campaign by the Web Standards Project, who have been busy urging IE users to switch browsers. ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
AuthorAll Replies

navalpatel

join:2003-07-28
Lubbock, TX
Patches Galore!

But IE users just love all the patches that Microsoft comes out with! * rolls eyes * - please switch to a real browser Mozilla Firefox


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

said by navalpatel See Profile:
But IE users just love all the patches that Microsoft comes out with! * rolls eyes * - please switch to a real browser Mozilla Firefox

Don't be so smug. Firecrap has patches too.
--
TripOnThis.net Administrator
"Security by obscurity is no security at all. Don't believe the hype." (c) MntlCase

B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28

Yet amazingly it's not "integrated" with the OS and so it isn't directly affected by 87% of Windows patch requirements.

In any case, I continue to recommend the Mozilla suite over the standalone Fireweasel.

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function

Jonbo298

join:2004-01-12
Council Bluffs, IA

reply to Matt
said by Matt See Profile:
said by navalpatel See Profile:
But IE users just love all the patches that Microsoft comes out with! * rolls eyes * - please switch to a real browser Mozilla Firefox

Don't be so smug. Firecrap has patches too.

That's a given. Every single thing has patches. The Mozilla team fixes patches infinitely faster then MS ever will. MS basically says "our users aren't having problems with this exploit" then a week later hell breaks loose and then a month later MS gets a fix out.


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

reply to B
said by B See Profile:
Yet amazingly it's not "integrated" with the OS and so it isn't directly affected by 87% of Windows patch requirements.

In any case, I continue to recommend the Mozilla suite over the standalone Fireweasel.

-- B

If you're not applying 87% of Windows patches, you have a much larger problem than what browser you're running.
--
TripOnThis.net Administrator
"Security by obscurity is no security at all. Don't believe the hype." (c) MntlCase

B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28

I disagree. I almost NEVER apply Windows patches. I really don't see a need to, unless there's a specific bug to address or unless the machine (server) is directly exposed to the Internet.

I could say, if you're running a generic Windows workstation without personal firewall software and without protection from an external NAT router or firewall, you have a much larger problem than what patches you've applied.

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function


SpitefulCrow
Insert Witty Tag Here
Premium
join:2003-06-04
Berkeley, CA
reply to B
Firefox and Thunderbird!
What would I want the overhead of the entire suite for when I can have two separate and lighter apps to do the same thing?

B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28


Because the total is about the same anyway, and because the full suite is a more mature and stable product that doesn't require excessive extensions?

(Talking out of butt -- don't know resource footprint numbers.)

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function


exocet_cm
In memory of dadkins
Premium
join:2003-03-23
New Orleans, LA
clubs:
·Cox HSI
·Suddenlink
·Cingular Wireless
·AT&T Southeast
·Charter Pipeline

 I use...

both browsers, IE6sp1 and Mozilla Firefox 0.9.3

Yes, I agree IE looks like a block of swiss cheese at a dairy shop, but alot of people do not posses the technical knowhow to understand that IE has major security flaws. They might hear it in the news, but if it is easy to use, and they haven't ran into problems, they won't switch.
--


Put your trust in the Lord, but your ass belongs to me.


File Quit
Mac Geek
Premium
join:2002-11-28

Finally...

all can see the light which is the path to a new browser. I really hope one of these browsers has great surges in popularity.
--
Mozilla Firefox. Switch today to rid yourself of IE and its flaws. »www.mozilla.org/firefox

dragonhorse

join:2004-06-30
Ottawa, ON
anti-IE!!!

I agree with anti-IE... IE have too many problems and a lot of the times the fixes are slow or sometimes open up a different hole somewhere else instead (its true)

dragonhorse....


jplove71
IBEW 113
Premium
join:2001-03-16
Colorado Springs, CO

reply to Matt
Re: Patches Galore!

said by Matt See Profile:
said by navalpatel See Profile:
But IE users just love all the patches that Microsoft comes out with! * rolls eyes * - please switch to a real browser Mozilla Firefox

Don't be so smug. Firecrap has patches too.

While this is true, the developers of Mozilla/Mozilla Firefox don't wait several months to patch their browser.

If I recall correctly, IE is still susceptible to phishing!
--
J2 Enterprises - Serving the Twin Cities area


Rhobite
Premium
join:2002-02-24
Cambridge, MA
clubs:

reply to Matt
said by Matt See Profile:
said by navalpatel See Profile:
But IE users just love all the patches that Microsoft comes out with! * rolls eyes * - please switch to a real browser Mozilla Firefox

Don't be so smug. Firecrap has patches too.

Hah, Firecrap. That's as bad as the people who insist on writing "M$" instead of "MS."
--
Jimmysquid.com - I take pictures.


Rhobite
Premium
join:2002-02-24
Cambridge, MA
clubs:

reply to jplove71
said by jplove71 See Profile:
If I recall correctly, IE is still susceptible to phishing!

Um, phishing is a social engineering attack. Any browser is susceptible, given the right user.
--
Jimmysquid.com - I take pictures.


inteller
Sociopaths always win.

join:2003-12-08
Tulsa, OK

Wrong focus.

as a web standards organization they should be spending time on promoting STANDARDS, not bashing other browsers.

At any rate, I thought we already have a web standards body, it is called the World Wide Web Consortium. I don't see why we need another one.


T0rn
Premium
join:2001-05-11
USA


1 edit
Blah, blah, blah...

Even simple sites with JavaScript do not appear correctly with Firefox. Also, you have a far better chance of pages operating correctly if you are using Internet Explorer rather than those other piece of crap 3rd party browsers.

IE is more comptabile, more integrated, more practical, and faster. More programs, that I've used, are designed to work with IE.

Thank you. I'll be sticking with IE.

(Try changing the directory for your History, Favorites, Cookies, and Temporary Internet Files with Firefox.)

(Start typing the shortcut name of a Favorites entry, and select it. Wait, can't do that in Firefox.)


fuzz
Fuzz
Premium
join:2000-06-05
FuzzLand
·AT&T Southeast

 The ULTIMATE Authority

Take heed to this quote..... It is from the mouth of GOD!!

The Inquirer, US Government warns against Internet Explorer:
The US Government has sent out a warning out to internet users through its Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT), pleading users to stop using Microsoft’s Internet Explorer.

YOU BETTER STOP USING I.E. NOW!!!!

Why? Cuz the Bible told me so.

--
fuzz

Trivista

join:2003-11-11
Longview, TX
reply to Matt
Re: Patches Galore!

And what is it that you do not like about FireFox?


Rhobite
Premium
join:2002-02-24
Cambridge, MA
clubs:

FireFox is better

OK, FireFox is better and it's what I use. But I consider them both to be good browsers. Are there any outstanding issues with IE6 SP2? I believe the latest version of IE is sufficiently secure, meaning there are no current bugs that allow a malicious page to execute code.

Of course if we're basing our decisions on Microsoft's past history, we probably shouldn't trust the latest IE. But that's a much weaker argument than this site is making: they're saying "IE can make your computer unsafe," then linking to four very nontechnical newspaper articles as their only justification for making this claim. Two of the articles are about vulnerabilities, one of which is an unpreventable spyware/ActiveX attack (made much more difficult by SP2's ActiveX blocker) and the other one was patched by MS04-025. The other two newspaper articles are about non-security "quality of browsing" issues such as popups.

I'm not pretending that IE is better than FireFox. Indeed it's much worse. But the claim they are making is "IE can make your computer unsafe" and as far as I can tell, they have not backed up that claim. If you don't agree with this post, go ahead, flame away but I will not respond to personal attacks.
--
Jimmysquid.com - I take pictures.

B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28
reply to Rhobite
Re: Patches Galore!


I believe the reference is to IE's willingness to display false information in both the URL box and the status bar.

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function
Forums » Browse Happypage: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4


Tuesday, 24-Nov 14:15:48 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF