 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
| How much... How much did DISH pay for the spectrum anyway?
In other news, the last thing we need are spectrum squatters, Dish or anyone else. Either they build the network (and light a fire under 3GPP to get the specs out) or they sell to someone who will...soon.
Personally, I would favor TMo and metroPCS's appeals to force a spectrum sale...if the spectrum does indeed intend to be sold. If Dish intends to launch their own network on 40Mhz, let them...but if they try to sell it they should be forced to break it into, at the largest, 20MHz chunks, and no more than half of the spectrum should go to AT&T+VZW. |
|
 BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | said by iansltx:How much did DISH pay for the spectrum anyway?
In other news, the last thing we need are spectrum squatters, Dish or anyone else. Either they build the network (and light a fire under 3GPP to get the specs out) or they sell to someone who will...soon. No need to light a fire, specs will be finalized in 7 months. Why it will take Dish 4 years after that to offer LTE service is beyond me. |
|
|
|
 | Because of the "Build out". It's just that. They are a Sat company, and so have to completely build a network of sites either as leased on others existing co-locations or build entirely new ones. There are also limited contractors that can handle such work. It's the same thing when 3g first hit and HDTV. Antenna needed to be upgraded or rebuilt and there was a shortage. In both of those cases, the owners (of the work- TV stations or a wireless provider) were simply doing what they already do, just upgrading. Dish has to start from scratch. Plus read the entire argument. Instead of having 30% coverage in 2015, they're planning on 60% at launch in '16. Nothing says that it can't happen faster, but with the current state of affairs (non-ratified specs, limited suppliers, able contractors for site building ((FCC licensed)....) they don't want to run into a roadblock when they're 4 months late, rather play it safe and bet on when they KNOW it can be done. No I'm not a Dish fan boy, I just have been in the industry for over 20 yeas and know how these things work..... |
|
 BiggA join:2005-11-23 EARTH Reviews:
·Comcast
| Makes no sense The whole thing makes no sense... building yet another network to deliver LTE service for fixed use... it doesn't add up. Even if they co-located with Sprint, they'd be better off just letting Sprint use the spectrum in exchange for wholesale capacity, and either way, it's not going to be a replacement for wired internet. |
|
 MichailPremium join:2000-08-02 Boynton Beach, FL kudos:1 | reply to dishanon
Re: How much... There are plenty of co-location spots out there. |
|
 NObamaPremium join:2005-11-09 Nashua, NH Reviews:
·Fairpoint Commun..
·magicjack.com
| There may be plenty of "spots" in some areas, but the major population centers are very congested. The available spaces on many of these structures is at or below the tree line. And rooftop sites in these areas? Forget about it. All the good sites are taken and extremely difficult to get a workable space. Then you have to lease and zone the site. Even if you co-locate like Lightsquared did with Sprint, you still have space issues, structural issues, and leasing issues. Riding one of the Big 4 is the best way to go. Building from scratch will cost billions more and take a lot longer. |
|