 | They should partner with Verizon for "Extended 4G LTE" I think US Cellular should partner with Verizon for Extended 4G LTE when I go to southwest Iowa I get 1X Data with US Cellular and Chat Mobility. |
|
 NOCManMacChatterPremium join:2004-09-30 Colorado Springs, CO | Is This The Google Forced Openess Block? Anyone know if this is the 700mhz band that Google drove the price up on that had open access requirements? |
|
 | I believe it is. I remember those blocks in that. And in the end Google did nothing but run away. |
|
|
|
 BiggA join:2005-11-23 EARTH | reply to Technicholas
Re: They should partner with Verizon for "Extended 4G LTE&q Incompatible technology. That's why Verizon is selling it off. They should do EVDO roaming though... |
|
 BiggA join:2005-11-23 EARTH | reply to 25139889
Re: Is This The Google Forced Openess Block? Nope, Verizon's Upper C had the open access requirement, A and B didn't. |
|
 sk1939Premium join:2010-10-23 Washington, DC kudos:9 | U.S. Cellular has been pushing for 700 MHz interoperability ....which AT&T and Verizon oppose.
Of course. |
|
 spamdPremium join:2001-04-22 Cherry Valley, IL | Verizon & USC I am still surprised that VZW has not bought USC yet. It seems like the two would make a perfect match. If not VZW then Sprint should. -- When everything is coming your way, you are in the wrong lane. |
|
 RR ConductorNWP RR Inc.,serving NW CAPremium join:2002-04-02 Redwood Valley, CA kudos:1 | said by spamd:I am still surprised that VZW has not bought USC yet. It seems like the two would make a perfect match. If not VZW then Sprint should. Actually, it's USCC (United States Cellular Corp.), USC is the University of Southern California. They can't just "buy" USCC, USCC is a owned by the Carlson Family, and until they okay a sell, USCC will stay put. USCC is the B Band Provider up here (Mendocino County, NW CA), Verizon is the A Band Provider, and the other providers are AT&T (PCS, formerly AT&T Affiliate Edge Wireless), T-Mobile and Metro PCS. |
|