<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>AT&#x26;T Southwest forum - dslreports.com community</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/ilec,swbell</link>
<description>AT&#x26;T Southwest forum current topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2007, dslreports.com</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:05:01 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:05:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>



<item>
<title>AT&#x26;amp;T DSL goes out almost evening between 8-11PM</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23318360</link>
<description><![CDATA[Really puzzled on this one since my line quality upon initial installation was good and the DSL Elite was rock solid from April till October. In October, AT&T started to put U-verse in my development and since then the line quality has gone down with the DSL dropping every evening between 8-11PM. Had a AT&T tech come out and there was virtually no signal loss between the NIC and the modem. He had no answer to my problem and suggested I would have to accept a lower speed. I suggested that he check the line quality from the CO to see where the drop off occurred but it fell on deaf ears. Of course, they are not putting U-verse in my phase because there is no existing cable. Any ideas or how I can get AT&T to clean up their lines which had been ok before? Thanks in advance.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23318360</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-10 02:38:19</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>AT&#x26;amp;T YAhoo Email Customers - servers are down</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23373347</link>
<description><![CDATA[This is an FYI - the email servers are down at the moment. 

No ETR but it is currently being worked on. This is affecting users that check email via an email client like Outlook, Thunderbird, Eudora and the list goes on.

At this moment webmail is currently working.

Please be patient - it is being worked on.

It may not affect all our customers either.

Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23373347</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-20 22:13:08</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>AT&#x26;amp;T DSL - ?? Sale to WISP for resale?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23385565</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anyone out there know if AT&T will sell DSL to WISP for wireless resale. If so, the cost and conditions of contract if anyone knows. I hear it's done, but not been able to knock it down for sure. Thanks in advance, Ed. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23385565</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-23 19:37:31</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Router config. problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23361968</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Very simple little desktop system with W2k sp4, etc. About as simple as a router app. can get.

ATT DSL Pro has been running reliably for years with SpeedStream 5100b modem, D-Link router.

The D-Link dies, I get a TP-Link TL-WR340G wireless Router to replace it. I am using it -only- as a wired router. Router info:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-Details.asp?EdpNo=4824256&sku=D145-1070&srkey=TP-Link%20TL-WR340

With the modem connected and working, I plug the new router in and everything works:

ipconfig IP Address. . .        xx.yyy.198.135
Router IP Address:          &#9;xx.yyy.198.135&#9;Dynamic IP
Modem Connection IP Address&#9;xx.yyy.198.135

At the end of the day, I power the system down. Next morn I boot system and the router is dysfunctional:

Router WAN IP Address:          &#9;00.000.000.000&#9;Dynamic IP

I've replicated the problem many, many times. More device info if needed.

Any/all ideas, suggestions, etc much appreciated.

  Puddin']]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23361968</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-18 20:41:37</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Higher latency after leaving KC.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23381886</link>
<description><![CDATA[Just noticed that I've been having higher latency over all in gaming and doing just ping testing.  Use to get ~20ms to 4.2.2.2 but now its upto 42ms.  I'm seeing this to just about every site I trace route to.  Anyone else seeing this?

Tracing route to vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net &#91;4.2.2.2&#93;&#012;over a maximum of 30 hops:&#012; &#012;  1    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  Faen.ta.deg &#91;192.168.1.1&#93;&#012;  2     1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  modem &#91;192.168.0.1&#93;&#012;  3     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  adsl-70-136-142-254.dsl.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net &#91;70&#012;.136.142.254&#93;&#012;  4     9 ms    10 ms     9 ms  dist2-vlan50.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net &#91;151.164.29.67&#012;&#93;&#012;  5     8 ms     9 ms     8 ms  bb2-tg3-0.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net &#91;151.164.40.233&#93;&#012; &#012;  6    42 ms    41 ms    42 ms  151.164.99.169&#012;  7    42 ms    41 ms    42 ms  4.68.62.41&#012;  8    43 ms    42 ms    42 ms  vlan52.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net &#91;4.69.138.190&#93;&#012;  9    55 ms    53 ms    52 ms  ae-5.ebr2.Chicago1.Level3.net &#91;4.69.140.193&#93;&#012; 10    75 ms   209 ms   219 ms  ae-21-56.car1.Chicago1.Level3.net &#91;4.68.101.162&#93;&#012; &#012; 11    43 ms    43 ms    42 ms  vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net &#91;4.2.2.2&#93;&#012; &#012;Trace complete.&#012;
Tracing route to resolver1.opendns.com &#91;208.67.222.222&#93;&#012;over a maximum of 30 hops:&#012; &#012;  1    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  Faen.ta.deg &#91;192.168.1.1&#93;&#012;  2     1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  modem &#91;192.168.0.1&#93;&#012;  3     8 ms     8 ms     8 ms  adsl-70-136-142-254.dsl.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net &#91;70&#012;.136.142.254&#93;&#012;  4     9 ms     9 ms     8 ms  67.64.49.66&#012;  5     9 ms     9 ms    11 ms  bb2-tg3-0.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net &#91;151.164.40.233&#93;&#012; &#012;  6    42 ms    42 ms    42 ms  151.164.99.185&#012;  7    42 ms    42 ms    43 ms  te7-2.ccr02.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com &#91;154.54.11.&#012;237&#93;&#012;  8    42 ms    46 ms    42 ms  38.20.49.10&#012;  9    43 ms    42 ms    43 ms  38.104.102.62&#012; 10    43 ms    42 ms    42 ms  resolver1.opendns.com &#91;208.67.222.222&#93;&#012; &#012;Trace complete.&#012;
Tracing route to www.dslreports.com &#91;209.123.109.175&#93;&#012;over a maximum of 30 hops:&#012; &#012;  1    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  Faen.ta.deg &#91;192.168.1.1&#93;&#012;  2     1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  modem &#91;192.168.0.1&#93;&#012;  3     8 ms     8 ms     8 ms  adsl-70-136-142-254.dsl.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net &#91;70&#012;.136.142.254&#93;&#012;  4     9 ms     9 ms     8 ms  67.64.49.66&#012;  5     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  bb2-tg3-0.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net &#91;151.164.40.233&#93;&#012; &#012;  6    42 ms    42 ms    41 ms  151.164.99.173&#012;  7    42 ms    42 ms    43 ms  asn1299-telia.eqchil.sbcglobal.net &#91;151.164.250.&#012;150&#93;&#012;  8    64 ms    62 ms    62 ms  nyk-bb1-link.telia.net &#91;80.91.248.193&#93;&#012;  9    69 ms    63 ms    69 ms  nyk-b3-link.telia.net &#91;80.91.248.174&#93;&#012; 10    69 ms    65 ms    70 ms  netaccess-tic-133837-nyk-b3.c.telia.net &#91;213.248&#012;.99.90&#93;&#012; 11    64 ms    63 ms    65 ms  0.e1-4.tbr1.mmu.nac.net &#91;209.123.10.101&#93;&#012; 12    64 ms    66 ms    66 ms  0.e1-1.tbr1.oct.nac.net &#91;209.123.10.17&#93;&#012; 13    64 ms    70 ms    70 ms  vlan804.esd1.oct.nac.net &#91;209.123.10.2&#93;&#012; 14    82 ms    80 ms    78 ms  www.dslreports.com &#91;209.123.109.175&#93;&#012; &#012;Trace complete.&#012;
--
http://twitter.com/powerspec |  http://netisinc.com  |  http://speedtest.kcmogaming.net
Home Internet: Sprint Mobile Broadband, DSL line: AT&T 6/768
Server: 100Mbps with Cogent/Level3, Work: 550Mbps Total with AT&T and EverestKC/Surewest]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23381886</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-23 03:37:35</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hybrid 3 with Speedstream 5100b and Elite service</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23379970</link>
<description><![CDATA[I've been having problems at night with a stalled connection and bursts of CRC errors.

Narrowed it down to a failing streetlight a couple of houses away and notified the power company to come and fix it.

However, I noticed in my log that I'm connecting using hybrid 3, my SN margin is around 11 dB, and my line attenuation is 47 dB.

I know that my house has daisychained wiring and my modem is at the end of the line.

What else can I do to get rid of hybrid 3 besides putting in a home run to the modem?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23379970</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-22 17:58:11</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>AT&#x26;amp;T DSL and wireless N router problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23384836</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone, Any help would be very much appreciated. I am a novice but generally can troubleshoot this type of stuff, but have now spent a good two days looking and I still am not completely sure.  I don't have DSL myself so I am not completely familiar with idiosyncrasies it may have vs. cable.

I am trying to help my brother troubleshoot an issue he is having connecting wirelessly to his DSL connection.  I will try to keep this as brief as possible.

He currently has AT&T DSL which is hard wired directly to one desktop station using a Motorola adsl modem model: 2210-02-1002, style MSTATEA.
  
He then has a Wireless N router which he generally connects to from a satellite desktop station using a wireless N PCI card.
 
Everything was working ok until several months ago when his old AT&T modem went out and he purchased the Motorola one listed above at Best Buy. 

Now he is completely unable to stay connected to the internet from the satellite location. Evidently when attempting to connect to the home network it also now shows the home network name listed twice.  

The hardwired desktop stays connected to the internet and does not suffer drops.

He currently has a D-Link Extreme wireless N Gaming router connected.  His wireless PCI card is also D-link wireless N.  We have also tried a TrendNet wireless N router and several other PCI cards with the same results.

The physical distance between the router and the satellite station is less than 70 feet and there does not to appear to be anything blocking or causing interference.  It is basically a straight shot blocked by 1 wall without any steel structure.  

First, does anyone know if the Motorola 2210-02-1002 modem is also a router?  On the Motorola website it seems like it may be, but its hard to tell if the FAQ is referring to this modem or possibly a different model of one that may also be a router.

It appears that using a "bridge" could be an option if this model is a modem/router, however I am not very savvy when it comes to routers and I don't completely understand what that means.  

According to the documentation I can find "enabling" the bridge will turn off the router portion of the modem, however I don't understand what the side effects of doing this are and it mentions authentication...I don't completely understand the result of removing it from the modem.  

At this point I would almost just hire a tech to come out and do this but 
1. Im not sure where to get the help.
2. AT&T doesnt seem to offer a wireless N router, only G and
3. Navigating support on AT&Ts site has been difficult.

Could someone point me in the right direction to figure out what the problem might be and how to correct it, or maybe where to find some sort of reliable technical support for this? 

thank you!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23384836</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-23 17:14:35</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Higher speeds possible?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23369409</link>
<description><![CDATA[I don't know if this has been asked before, but is it possible for att to offer higher speeds than what they offer right now through dsl? Something like for people that are close enough to the co to get higher speeds, or is the tech being used now at its limit for adsl?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23369409</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-20 09:28:35</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Going back to at&#x26;amp;t DSL... unexcited. Got some questions</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23323589</link>
<description><![CDATA[When did at&t quit sending free new modems to new customers?
They're really charging $62.05 for this basic P.O.S. Motorola modem?
Assuming I'd get that one would it be compatible with my Linksys WRT54G?
Assuming I don't get that one, which cheapo modem, compatible with aforementioned Linksys should I get from Craigslist?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23323589</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-10 23:44:43</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
