Search:  

 






how-to block ads



Member review of VoicePulse


more information on the company
Ad-hoc VoicePulse Forum
VOIP Forum

Reviews:
read 211 reviews (175 positive) (17 negative)
If you wish to review this company, email reviews@dslreports.com
login for new review notification feature
Six Month Rating

Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:


$20 per month avg ($15 to $27)

3 year trend

Review by music4praise See Profile
Posted: 354 days ago
member for 2.7 years, 862 visits, last login: a few hours ago


Big Rapids,Mecosta,MI
$16 per month (month by month)
about 5 days
"Month after month, it just keeps working"
"Voicemail does not date/time stamp"
"Great value"
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)

    My Other Reviews·QuantumVoice
    I first got Voicepulse in September 2004. At first I used it as a second line for testing, long distance, and a throw away number to give to mail order companies. There were some issues getting it to work with the old Belkin router I had but it worked great with a Linksys one. Since then I replaced my router with another one that had QOS settings which helped keep the phone going when someone in my family was doing file downloads.

    Customer service has been terrific. The issue gets taken care of and I get a phone call to check up on the work order. Over 3+ years I think I have had only five issues.

    Most of the time, calls are as good or better than a pots line. Occasionally there is a little echo. It seems to be isolated to a few troublesome local exchanges. Long distance is nearly always flawless as are calls to/from my own exchange. There was a period of about three weeks this November that occasionally callers complained that they our voices were breaking up. Pingplotter showed some serious issues with some routing in Chicago. That seems to be resolved. It was not a Voicepulse issue.

    In January 2006 I ported my landline number and since I have used Voicepulse and cell phones exclusively. Except for the period mentioned in the previous paragraph, it has worked great.

    Even though Voicepulse has not rolled out any new features in a while, they still have more than most other voip carriers. I particularly like the anonymous call blocking. It gets rid of most telemarketers effectively. If other numbers get to be a nuisance, I block them individually.

    There are only two things that I would like improvement on. First off, the voicemail really needs to have date/time stamps. If I am gone for a few days it is difficult to know which calls are which without a timestamp clue. Secondly, I wish they would set outgoing calling id name. Since we ported a number, the name is still showing up in some cases but we do get the occasional complaint from people we call. Incoming calling id name works just fine.

    Followup comments:
    Lenagainster

    join:2005-01-07
    Silver Spring, MD
    ·DIRECTV
    ·VoicePulse
    ·magicjack.com
    ·Cavalier Telephone
    ·Verizon FIOS
    ·AT&T CallVantage

    Regarding voicemail

    We solved the voicemail/timestamp issue by getting a digital answering machine. Much more convenient to get the calls off the answering maching either at home or remotely. Voicemail is only used for ignored call waiting calls.

    Or, with a bit of plodding, you could check the incoming calls on the call log against the voicemail and get the time of the call that way.

    Or you could have them send you an email every time you get a voicemail, and the time information will be on the email.

    The Caller ID thing is 'iffy'. Some see our name, others don't. I guess it depends on what data source the person receiving your call has with their service.

    I agree with your assessment of VoicePulse. I've only been with them for a year and have been very pleased. With all the features for a mere $15.89 per month, how could we go wrong?
    music4praise

    join:2006-02-22
    Big Rapids, MI
    ·QuantumVoice
    ·VoicePulse

    Re: Regarding voicemail

    I appreciate your attempt to provide us with a workaround to the time stamp issue. To me the time stamp has the most use when you are actually listening to a message. I have used the call log from the website a few times when it was really important to track down the time a call came in. It just shouldn't be necessary.

    My wife and I think it is rude to interrupt someone's call with call waiting so we have it turned off. We want voice mail in particular for those occasions. Going back to an answering machine is not desirable since it cannot take a message when the phone is "busy."
    Lenagainster

    join:2005-01-07
    Silver Spring, MD

    Re: Regarding voicemail

    Well, I certainly won't 'attempt' to make any suggestions to you again. You seem to have your mind made up.
    music4praise

    join:2006-02-22
    Big Rapids, MI

    Re: Regarding voicemail

    My use of the word "attempt" was not intended disparagingly. I'm sorry you took offense at it.
    Forums » comments on review of VoicePulse


Friday, 05-Dec 10:29:40 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole