Search:  

 






how-to block ads



Member review of DSL EXTREME


News tagged to this company
more information on the company
Full DSL EXTREME Forum

Reviews:
read 1074 reviews (850 positive) (115 negative)
If you wish to review this company, email reviews@dslreports.com
login for new review notification feature
Award!

about
Six Month Rating

Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:


$32 per month avg ($15 to $62)

Speed test results 3 year trend

Review by kmcmurtrie See Profile
UPDATED: 126 days ago
member for 2.6 years, 72 visits, last login: 19 days ago


San Mateo,San Mateo,CA
$62 per month (12 month contract)
about 15 days
SBC
"Fast internet"
"Broken Usenet, Google"
"Great when it works"
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings below consensus)

    My Other Reviews·SONIC.NET
    Update (Sunnyvale, not San Mateo) - Usenet service has been only semi-functional for the past couple of months. Today I received a notice that DSLExtreme is moving their e-mail services to Google Apps. I know Google's long history of supporting spammers and criminals through security holes and non-existent customer service. I will be closing my account.

    -----

    Ordering was straightforward but finding a complete list of services was difficult. There was some install downtime because SBC is using an ADSL protocol that doesn't work on older modems. A new off-the-shelf modem fixed it.

    When everything is working, DSLExtreme offers a rich set of services for a low price. You get 6016/608 ADSL, multiple mail accounts, Usenet, static IPs, great throughput, and online account management tools.

    When it's not working, your life is hell. Tech support is so difficult to work with that one might thing they're playing a child's game of intentionally misinterpreting trouble tickets. Trouble tickets are never handled offline. You must be on the phone with them while the problem is being solved. A number of tickets have required several hours of phone calls when every bit of information they asked for was contained in my first e-mail to the support department. Some problems are ongoing and never resolved - large numbers of hijacked customer computers triggering spam blacklists and draining bandwidth with dictionary attacks, outdated spam filter options, and regular mail outages.

    Followup comments:

    dslx_tech
    Premium,VIP
    join:2005-10-03
    Salt Lake City, UT

    DSLExtreme

    I apologize for any inconvenience that you may have experienced. We at DSLExtreme value the customers experience above all else. I would definitely like to address all the issues that you are having. If you send me an IM with your account information I will make sure that any issues that you have get addressed.
    --
    Aldo
    Technical Support Supervisor
    DSLExtreme
    Will work for reviews.
    Ratbert

    join:2006-08-15
    Apo, AE

    Customer v. rat's behind.

    Re: post by kmcmurtrie July 10th 06.

    "When it's not working, your life is hell.- - -"

    I switched from Earthlink dial-up to DSLX dial-up 5 years ago. It has been working very well.
    Tech support practically unused. Starting in June 2006 I have been planning to upgrade
    to DSL and started to study the self-installation kit from DSLX by e-mails.
    It worked very well until it drifted into the Twilight Zone and finally ground to complete halt.

    SUMMARY.

    From June 1 to June 15 my e-mail questions were answered promptly. After that no
    replies regardless of several re-transmissions.
    Here is the list of them:
    June 15, sent to support@dslextreme.com
    June 27, sent to admin@dslextreme.com
    July 5, sent to kb@dslextreme.com
    No reply to any.
    ---------------
    August 9, called Sales to complain. After 2 minutes on hold talked to Nima. He was sorry
    for the troubles and asked me to re-send the mail to billing@dslextreme.com.
    Nice, professional!
    I did as told. Received reply from Support stating:Hello! A new DSLExtreme ticket
    has been created for your issue:
    ----------
    Next day received the following referring to the original ticket number:
    "Dear Valued Customer,
    Our support representatives have tried to contact you multiple times over the past
    few days in regards to your open ticket. They have been unable to reach you.
    At this time, your ticket has been moved to a 72 hour status, which means it will
    be automatically closed withing 72 hours if we do not hear back from you. If you
    still need any assistance this ticket can be reopened if you call or reply to this email."

    Nobody had contacted me. Looked like a canned message. Checked Ticket Viewer:
    this old ticket number was not even listed!
    The new ticket number was listed as CLOSED!!!!.
    ------------------------------
    Sent a complaint to Support and Billing. A couple of days later checked Ticket Viewer.
    The new ticket was now PENDING.
    Nothing received after this related to my concerns.
    It is impossible that all of the earlier e-mails got lost. It looks more like somebody
    decided dealing further with this customer was not worth of the trouble. Ignore him.
    If it does not work, then block him out with spam filter.
    Very effective but is it a good business practice is a different matter. Unless the
    business is run like by The Three Stooges!
    Go figure.
    A customer always is supposed to be worth more a rat's behind.
    **********************************************************
    DETAILS.

    Below are fragments from e-mails in question for your amusement.
    R-b stands for Ratbert. DSLX stands for DSL Extreme support.
    **********************************************************
    R-b: Your Approved Modem List is a long one. Which make and model
    are you currently supplying?
    DSLX: Westell HSA300
    ------------------
    R-b: Westell HSA300 is not a model number.
    DSLX: As of today we are sending The Westell 2100
    -----------------------
    R-b: Westell lists 4 different types of model 2100 shown below. Which is the one
    you are sending as of today?
    The PDF spec files are over 100 pages. Better to have the right type number

    DSLX: The Westell 2100 b90-210015-04

    R-b: Westell documentation(from Westell site) is available to end-user only for 2100 b90-210010-04.
    Can it be used as reference also for Westell 2100 b90-210015-04?
    What is the difference between the two?
    DSLX: You would have to contact the modem manufacturer to answer your question.
    ------------------------------------------------
    R-b:
    From Westell site: Westell technical support is offered to Internet Service Providers,
    independent phone companies, and distributors. If you are an end user,
    please contact your Internet Service Provider for technical support.
    They are not dealing with me.

    DSLX: We should be able to provide you the answer you need if you tell us why you need
    specific data on the modems. As far as I can tell with your previous emails to billing,
    you want to connect several computers to the internet. Is that correct?
    --------------
    R-b: To clear up possible trouble spots before installation and not after. There are lots of related
    horror stories on the net. In Zeus I trust. Everything else needs specs.
    Correct. Only two for the time being.
    ------------------
    R-b: Is a CD included with Westell 2100 b90-210015-04 modem?
    DSLX: We do not stock or ship modem cd's.
    The modem is non-configurable, it is what is referred to as a "dumb" modem, it acts as a terminal, so to speak,
    you merely plug it in and turn it on
    -----------------
    R-b: Sounds good. The dumber - the better.
    However, after considering everything, including "fine print" in the service agreement, I believe to be better
    off by buying my own modem. A seemingly good candidate is shown below. It's even dumber (no USB mode).
    ----------------
    Sent hem ZOOM Model 5615 Specifications.
    »www.zoom.com/graphics/datasheets···_Brg.pdf
    jpeg images of 2 pages included with e-mail.
    The specs seemed to meet DSLX requirements.
    -------------
    R-b: Your requirements:
    "Technical Specifications Required: MUST be an ADSL modem that supports RFC1483 / Bridge
    Mode and DMT (g.DMT) VP set to 0 VC set to 35"
    Since I do not know what all the alphabet - soup means, I would appreciate if you good
    have a look at the specs to see if it is compatible with your service.
    DSLX:
    Reply still missing on August 20.
    Ratbert

    join:2006-08-15
    Apo, AE

    ZOOM Model 5615 Specifications

    DSLX Tech. Service replied by IM on 2006-08-22
    stating that the modem in question was compatible
    with their service.
    Forums » comments on review of DSL EXTREME


Wednesday, 03-Dec 03:50:00 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.